In order to understand the historic disaster that unfolded for Colorado Republicans in the 2022 midterm elections, a good place to begin is the results of the Republican Party state assembly in April. Historically, winning the state assembly is not a reliable predictor of success in the primary election, but it is a reliable indicator of where the party’s most dedicated organizers and influencers are.
And as Colorado Public Radio reported on that fateful Saturday, April 9, the GOP faithful chose candidates for the primary ballot who would come back to haunt them:
Republicans on Saturday set the stage for competitive primary elections in a statewide assembly that was dominated by talk of election security and gender politics — along with high hopes for the party’s return to power in Colorado.
The nominees include some of the party’s most prominent election deniers. Tina Peters, the Mesa County clerk who has been indicted for the alleged theft of election systems data, will take the top line among three Republican candidates to challenge Democratic Secretary of State Jena Griswold.
Meanwhile, state Rep. Ron Hanks shut out all other assembly candidates and will be one of only two names on the party’s U.S. Senate primary ballot, alongside businessman Joe O’Dea, who petitioned on. They’re vying to challenge Democratic incumbent Michael Bennet. Hanks has embraced false claims that the 2020 elections were stolen and has been closely involved with Peters and a national network of election skeptics…
The result of the GOP state assembly, especially in the U.S. Senate race where multiple ostensibly viable candidates were knocked out of the race by insurrectionist state Rep. Ron Hanks, was a major shock to Colorado Republican strategists hoping to regain ground after punishing defeats in the two previous election cycles. Hanks’ resounding win at the assembly left only unknown self-funding construction executive Joe O’Dea, who petitioned on the ballot, to oppose Hanks for the U.S. Senate nomination.
Recognizing that Hanks would be not just a concession of the race but a source of collateral damage for the rest of the Republican ticket–like
Hiedi Heidi Ganahl proved to be, but that’s for another post–“establishment” Republicans and their pundit-class mouthpieces leaned in hard to prop up O’Dea, casting any pretense of neutrality to the wind in a desperate attempt to stave off Hanks. In the Secretary of State’s race, Mesa County Clerk Tina Peters’ felony indictments didn’t faze the party faithful one bit, and her win at the state assembly likewise terrified country club Republicans into openly boosting the eventual nominee Pam Anderson.
With some help from unaffiliated voters who were receptive to the false argument from establishment Republicans that candidates who won their party’s assemblies were being imposed upon then by “meddling” Democrats, Hanks, Peters, and Ganahl’s feckless opponent Greg Lopez all lost in the June 28th primary election. It’s true that Democrats trolled the Senate and gubernatorial races by promoting Hanks and Lopez in ads intended to have backhanded appeal to conservative voters. In response, Republicans put all their chips on the argument that “Democratic meddling” had made the winning candidates more electable.
As we know now, that’s not what happened. After Joe O’Dea and Heidi Ganahl had a brief honeymoon with national political press falsely casting them as “moderate” victors over Democratic shenanigans, both of these campaigns fell apart after they failed with absolutely no one’s help to live up to that billing. As we’ll explain in upcoming posts, O’Dea and Ganahl each squandered their June primary victories in different ways. But their spirals downward began with a common hubris, borne of denial of what today’s Republican Party has become–and how far out of touch they are even at the highest levels from a majority of Colorado voters.
It’s a problem so fundamental that we do not have a solution, so fortunately that is not our job.
I got inspired by some of the "Jesus, Prince of Peace" stuff I heard over the past few days. Rhetorical question – how long until His followers start denouncing campaigns where the candidates basically use WMDs to get their point across?
When you get the urge to repurpose the white sheets hanging in your closet…
I'm surprised they let the 2nd one from the left in. Her hair isn't big enough.
And white hoods!
That's middle school home ec level sewing.
…until the 12th of never and that's a long, long tiiimeee!"
That's the answer I was looking for! Donny Osmond rules!!!
Sorry 2Jung, Johnny Mathis' version is far superior.
Just listened to the Mathis version for my first time, and the man who co-wrote the song truly had some pipes! The Osmond version was in my childhood AM radio rotation, therefore part of the growth and development process that made me who I am today.
O Holy Night by Johnny Mathis is my absolute favorite Christmas tune. Boy that man could sing!
Like many parts of the Bible, different followers can find different verses & images.
"Prince of Peace" is popular — but not among the White Evangelicals and Christian Nationalists who gravitate to the MAGA movement. Those folks focus on "Christ the King" and avoiding infringements on their rights (and thus, their ability to be the "protectors" of liberty).
Laura Clawson has a short essay on Daily Kos hinting at the key feature: Right-wing hypocrisy is never hypocrisy. It's a coherent belief system. "The right-wing belief system is that if it benefits them, it’s good. If they want it, it’s right. If it helps them gain power, it’s proper."
Don't try to hold your breath that long.
She was granted Trump dispensation. She had other "talents".