An ambitious proposal from most of the Senate’s top leaders on education policy and Education Secretary Arne Duncan, as McClatchy reports today:
U.S. Secretary of Education Arne Duncan and a group of Democratic senators this morning embraced a slate of education reforms that move away from rigid testing and toward flexibility for local school districts…
Part of the push is to re-vamp No Child Left Behind, the landmark Bush-era legislation that focused on closing the achievement gap for minority children, but also has been lambasted by parents and educators as too narrowly focused on testing.
“I’ve heard for years from principals and teachers that this does not work,” said U.S. Sen. Kay Hagan, a North Carolina Democrat who, along with U.S. Sen. Michael Bennet of Colorado, helped lead the effort to develop the principles. “The stale arguments of yesterday are impeding change, and the same-old, same-old is too late.”
Hagan said new legislation must encourage all progress – recognizing, for example, when a teacher helps a 5th grader, for example, move up from a 3rd-grade reading level to a 4th-grade reading level.
Now, testing focuses primarily on whether children are at or below grade level.
There’s quite a bit to this proposal, including better testing methods, retention of new teachers, flexible approaches to meeting academic targets, and prioritization of funding for the lowest-performing districts in individual states. And yes, it includes more of the competitive “Race to the Top” style grants for states who submit education reform plans.
We know that the convoluted process of awarding these grants in previous years, and Colorado’s failure to win the competition despite significant reform measures like last year’s Senate Bill 191, has left a bad taste in a lot of local mouths. But there’s no question we could still use the money; and one would hope these reforms, local and federal, would factor as well.
Additionally, we haven’t seen any signs to indicate this is a backroom subversion of everything good and decent in the world, as seems to frequently be charged when the name Michael Bennet is mentioned with “education.” We realize this won’t put a stop to the, um, theories.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
BY: kwtree
IN: Tuesday Open Thread
BY: 2Jung2Die
IN: Tuesday Open Thread
BY: kwtree
IN: Tuesday Open Thread
BY: Ben Folds5
IN: Tuesday Open Thread
BY: JohnNorthofDenver
IN: Tuesday Open Thread
BY: Ben Folds5
IN: Tuesday Open Thread
BY: notaskinnycook
IN: Tuesday Open Thread
BY: kwtree
IN: Tuesday Open Thread
BY: Ben Folds5
IN: Tuesday Open Thread
BY: 2Jung2Die
IN: Tuesday Open Thread
Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!
This is going to be good.
Can re-live the entire primary by the end of this thread
Effective school reform efforts invites attacks from all sides. But they’re stepping up to address the most important issue this country faces long term. They both deserve a major thank you.
This is exactly why I wanted Bennet in the Senate.
from one of President Obama’s more vocal supporters in 2008 – Matt Damon.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/…
And when the President is allowing ‘reformers’ like Bennet and Duncan to take the lead, they call for school closures, increased testing, and other brilliant ideas that make no sense whatsoever:
http://www.politico.com/news/s…
This argument is not going away – this is a fundamental assault on the Public Education system. If you think this is not related to Wisconsin, think again.
The neocons and the few DINOs millionaires that are working alongside with them don’t care about the middle class being well educated.
The primary is over, the fight has just begun.
But they are doing this because the see how our educational system has been parked in failure for decades and they think their proposals are the best way forward.
Disagree with what you think will work. But I think it’s unfair to say they are trying to destroy public education.
a common sense approach as suggested by Arne Duncan is to increase class sizes?
Arne Duncan is not in favor of increasing class sizes.
He is, however, thinking creatively in multiple ways, including how to deal with the reality of increasing class size.
Because we know continuing to operate as before will fail.
We do know that the quality of the teacher has more impact on how well a student does than everything else combined (except the mother’s educational level – which again requires a better system). So are you going to be leading the fight to improve the quality of our teachers?
The Race to the Top gambit resulted in Colorado passing legislation which depended on the Top money to be implemented. NO win. NO money. Plan with no funding.
I need Merida and Guerin Green to explain to me how this is all part of Michael Bennet’s evil plan to kill teachers.
it’s being discussed at SquareState as you read this. The other day they were bitching about Bennet’s salary.
http://www.denverpost.com/opin…
The same guy who brought us Windows Vista. It still sucks.