President (To Win Colorado) See Full Big Line

(D) Kamala Harris

(R) Donald Trump

80%↑

20%

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

(R) V. Archuleta

98%

2%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

(R) Marshall Dawson

95%

5%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Hurd

(D) Adam Frisch

50%

50%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert

(D) Trisha Calvarese

90%

10%

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Crank

(D) River Gassen

80%

20%

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

(R) John Fabbricatore

90%

10%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) B. Pettersen

(R) Sergei Matveyuk

90%

10%

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(R) Gabe Evans

52%↑

48%↓

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
June 11, 2010 06:03 PM UTC

"Conservadems" Bennet, Udall Swat Down CO2 Amendment

  • 8 Comments
  • by: Colorado Pols

As the Boston Globe reports:

The US Senate defeated a bid yesterday to limit federal regulation of greenhouse gases, instead siding with the White House and environmentalists who said regulators must have sufficient tools to fight climate change.

The GOP-backed resolution would have denied the Environmental Protection Agency the authority to implement carbon dioxide emissions rules crafted under the federal Clean Air Act. By rejecting the measure, 53 to 47, senators buoyed a more comprehensive climate and energy bill championed by Senator John F. Kerry.

Opponents of the resolution, referring frequently to the oil gushing into the Gulf of Mexico, said it made no sense to undermine efforts to curtail greenhouse gas emissions and reduce dependence on oil and other fossil fuels.

“Why is it that the United States of America is more dependent today on foreign oil than we were before Sept. 11?” Kerry said during a fiery floor speech. “Because we haven’t done anything – nothing – to reduce our dependence on foreign oil. We have an opportunity to do it now. This is about that.”

The Colorado Independent has local reactions–after all, both Colorado Sens. Mark Udall and Michael Bennet voted against the Murkowski amendment, once again on the wrong side of the “Conservadems” they’re fashionably lumped with. In this case, several prominent “Conservadems” like Ben Nelson and Blanche Lincoln were cosponsors of the GOP’s amendment, so it’s a distinction that couldn’t be clearer (note to Rachel Maddow). And of course, you can’t utter the words “carbon dioxide” in Colorado without Sen. Kevin “Flat Earth” Lundberg getting a quote:

“The Gulf disaster is a painful reminder that we must move our country off of oil,” Environment Colorado field director Gavin Clark said in a release. “We’re thankful that today Sens. Udall and Bennet voted against this Washington bailout to big oil and other polluters. We urge [Udall and Bennet] to now help pass a comprehensive clean energy and climate bill through the Senate this year.”

The resolution had the backing of Republicans and some coal-country Democrats like Sen. Jay Rockefeller of West Virginia. Colorado Republicans predictably slammed the EPA and praised Murkowski’s efforts.

“We’re not talking about a knee jerk reaction to an oil spill in the Gulf,” state Sen. Kevin Lundberg, R-Berthoud, said in a release. “We’re talking about the EPA taking authority they don’t have and declaring carbon dioxide a pollutant, which is absurd.”

You have to admit–even during the most vitriolic infighting and drive-by punditry, guys like Lundberg do a great job reminding everybody paying attention what side they’re really on.

Comments

8 thoughts on ““Conservadems” Bennet, Udall Swat Down CO2 Amendment

  1. > About 30% of the CO2 we are spewing into the atmosphere gets taken up by the oceans.

    >CO2 dissolved in water forms carbonic acid and lowers the pH.

    > The oceans are becoming more acidic.

    >When oceans are more acidic, calcium is more likely to remain in solution, rather than precipitate out as a carbonate.

    > The hard parts of many marine organisms, including corals, are calcium carbonate.

    > Corals and plankton form the base of many food webs and the structure of important marine habitats.

    > Atmospheric CO2 is increasing at about 1% per year.

    > At current rates, it will take just a couple decades for atmospheric CO2 to exceed 500ppm.

    “When CO2 levels in the atmosphere reach about 500 parts per million, you put calcification out of business in the oceans.”



    Professor Hoegh-Guldberg said an experiment at Heron Island, in which CO2 levels were increased in the air of tanks containing corals, had showed it caused some corals to cease forming skeletons. More alarmingly, red calcareous algae – the ‘glue’ that holds the edges of coral reefs together in turbulent water – actually began to dissolve.

    Science Daily

    NOAA Research

    Scientific American

    And, of course, there’s much more …

    Google “carbon dioxide ocean acidity”

  2. With 47 votes I think that means the end of the road for climate legislation. 47 “yes” votes on Murkowski are almost certainly at least 45 “no” votes on cloture for a climate bill.

    1. The Kerry-Lieberman bill, under the best of circumstances, would have maybe kept us at  450ppm.  There’s a fairly wide consensus in the scientific community that 450 would result in catastrophic species extinctions and widespread loss of human life.  So, it might be better in the interim to have EPA regulate greenhouse gases, while a separate and hopefully aggressive (due to Gulf spill) “clean energy” bill is passed, and then go back to the drawing board in 2011 on a climate bill.

      Despite the fact that even many elementary school children understand, thanks in part to Al Gore, that there is no room left for compromise in dealing with the climate crisis, Senators in DC still seem to think you can negotiate and compromise with Mother Nature.  Hence the statements from Senate staffers along the lines of “the votes aren’t there for 350.  450, maybe–but not 350.”  It is that kind of inanity that we must combat.  Politics as usual, and compromise, will be wholly insufficient to deal with the climate crisis.

  3. Obviously Kevin Lundberg isn’t a golfer, or he would have known that in Massachusetts v. EPA, the Supreme Court ruled that the EPA in fact does have the power to regulate emissions of greenhouse gases.

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

88 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!