Lobbyists Questionably Leap To Sen. Jack Tate’s Defense

MONDAY UPDATE #2: In a thoughtful Facebook post, Rep. Jonathan Singer calls the story in question “media-enabled gaslighting.”

We can do better.

This might come as a shock to some people. Of all the elected officials that have allegations against them, I’ve been friends with … pretty much all of them. And that shouldn’t matter to the media.

It turns out that people who do bad things can be very nice people. That’s how they can continue to bad things. It’s also one reason why survivors choose not to come forward. If there are more victims, do you think they’re more or less likely to step forward now?

We have to take every allegation seriously and I think it’s absolutely appropriate for someone to refute an allegation if they were direct witness to it. I also think it’s alright if people don’t want to rush to judge their peers. Let our process (that could improve) play out first. I don’t think any of the people in the article were intending to discredit the victim or stop new reports. But those just might be the consequences.

—–

MONDAY UPDATE: Conservative blog Colorado Peak Politics’ lede today says a mouthful:

That’s how the boys explain these things, yes! Unfortunately the victims tend to see it differently.

And yes, this is yet another shining example of the problem.

—–

UPDATE #2: More from today’s post from Morgan Carroll, as Statesman reporter Ernest Luning responds–Carroll lays out the problem brilliantly:

Morgan Carroll: Just to be clear. You wrote the story in question. You miss the point. I think it looks like a lineup of lobbyists (who have professional and financial ties to Tate) [Pols emphasis] defending an elected official overall suggesting that if women lobbyists think Sen. Tate is a nice guy that the he couldn’t have harassed or been inappropriate with an intern.

Exactly.

—–

UPDATE: In a testy Facebook exchange with Colorado Democratic Party chair Morgan Carroll, longtime Capitol lobbyist Wendy Aiello appears to confirm that she is “working with” Sen. Jack Tate to respond to the allegations against him:

This detail is significant because Megan Dubray, who is extensively quoted in today’s story from the Colorado Statesman’s Ernest Luning (below), is listed as “of counsel” for Aiello Public Relations. None of these relationships are disclosed in Luning’s story.

Which is, of course, a big problem.

—–

Sen. Jack Tate.

A new story from Ernest Luning of the former Colorado Statesman this morning is stoking fresh controversy in the growing scandal over widespread sexual harassment in the Colorado Capitol. The story consists of several lobbyists defending Sen. Jack Tate from allegations of misconduct leveled in a story by KUNC’s Bente Birkeland late last week.

Luning’s story is problematic on several levels–for Sen. Tate, and also the lobbyists attempting to jump on this grenade on Tate’s behalf:

“I was surprised by the story,” lobbyist Adeline Hodge told Colorado Politics. “I was definitely surprised to hear Jack Tate’s name thrown into the ring. I think we can all acknowledge there are things at the Capitol that need improvement, but I think we need to focus on the true problem areas.”

Said lobbyist Cindy Sovine-Miller: “I’ve worked very closely with Sen. Tate, and I’ve never experienced anything like that. He’s very respectful of his wife and his daughter and the women around him. I’m not trying to say sexual harassment isn’t happening at the Capitol, but you guys are pointing the finger at the wrong guy.”

The most stout–and questionable–defense of Tate came from Meg Dubray, a (nominally) Democratic lobbyist:

“What we saw in the paper didn’t show some sort of deviant pattern of behavior. The whole thing — a politician’s job is kissing babies and shaking hands. He’s a friendly guy, he’s from the South and has that sort of congenial nature to him. But it’s never been toward me or anyone I’ve seen in a less than completely respectful way,” [Dubray] said.

After repeating one of the story’s allegations — that Tate had supposedly told the anonymous intern he “really liked that skirt” she was wearing while on an elevator with her — Dubray said she doubted it happened that way but, even if it had, it was an example of Tate’s southern manners and nothing to get alarmed about.

“He always appreciates when men and women are dressed well,” Dubray said with a laugh. “But not in a creepy way, almost in a funny, goofy way.” [Pols emphasis]

That’s what they all say, isn’t it?

Of course it may be true that Tate has never harassed Dubray personally, or these other lobbyists personally, but that doesn’t rule out the possibility that he did so with others. And we’re sorry, but dismissing such behavior as “funny” or “goofy” has allowed way too many predators to continue with their predation.

Anyone who has followed the pitched battles in the legislature in recent years over legislation easing restrictions on subprime personal lenders is aware that Dubray is the lobbyist who worked with Sen. Tate on behalf of those lenders. In 2015, a last-minute bill that Dubray helped sneak through the House was vetoed by Gov. John Hickenlooper after an outcry from consumer advocates and in some cases hoodwinked Democrats.

The point? Meg Dubray has a gainful professional relationship with Sen. Tate. We haven’t looked into the other lobbyists’ disclosures, but it wouldn’t surprise us to learn the same.

Folks, how could this story be published without mentioning that? It’s irresponsible to leave that crucial fact out, even if it can be straightforwardly inferred. And it segues into the larger problem with these defenses of Tate: they seem to all be coming from lobbyists, and Jack Tate is the chairman of the Senate Business, Labor and Technology Committee.

If the conflict of interest here is not immediately evident to you, please go back and reread Ethics 101.

11 Community Comments, Facebook Comments

  1. Pseudonymous says:

    They say they’re alarmed the Centennial Republican could be unfairly caught up in a scandal they agree is bringing long overdue scrutiny to harassment at the state Capitol.

    I think we can all acknowledge there are things at the Capitol that need improvement, but I think we need to focus on the true problem areas.

    I’m not trying to say sexual harassment isn’t happening at the Capitol, but you guys are pointing the finger at the wrong guy.

    There’s these stories coming out that are very much corroborated, and then the one about Jack Tate comes out and it’s, wait, what?

    We need to handle real, legitimate problems seriously, but let’s not destroy someone in the press when they don’t even have a chance to face their accuser.

    Welcome to the Moore-ification of Colorado.  Why is it that victims don't come forward again?

  2. bullshit!bullshit! says:

    http://www.denverpost.com/2017/11/19/metoo-colorado-capitol-sexual-harassment/

    In numerous conversations with The Post, lobbyists, lawmakers and aides described the Capitol’s “permissive” atmosphere. Others noted that some female lobbyists used their sexuality to get lawmakers’ attention.

    Lobbyists, especially lobbyists being paid to talk, are THE LAST people anyone should be listening to, especially over an 18 year old girl.

    This is more disgusting than I think most people even realize. Shame on you, Wendy Aiello.

    • spaceman65 says:

      Aiello posted this on the thread on Carroll's post:  "Or they're supporting him because they know the accusation is false. You're trashing women who are standing up for him? Hippocrical?" (Italics added.)  Aiello has gone full Roy Moore supporter.  The logic is trumpian:  "I know Tate.  I like Tate.  Tate's never done anything to me.  Ergo, Tate didn't do this."  Yeah, she's chosen sides, which is her right, but she doesn't have proof that Tate didn't do this.  

      • JeffcoBlueJeffcoBlue says:

        Because you can't prove a negative. You can, OTOH, prove that people are being paid by other people.

        Shame on every lobbyist trying to crush this intern's story. You have no ethics.

    • JeffcoBlueJeffcoBlue says:

      Word. There is another side to this, a reason why misconduct is tolerated. It's because some lobbyists exploit this environment to get votes. And now you've got a bunch of lobbyists ganging up to discredit an intern?!

      THIS STINKS TO HIGH HEAVEN…

  3. Diogenesdemar says:

    "No. No, that's why I was surprised, because I said like I don't know that person that would talk that way, and that he would say that kind of stuff in private,"

    Melania Trump

  4. RepealAndReplace says:

    I have to say this about Jack Tate…..

    He's handling this the way pols are taught to handle any scandal in Candidate School 101. Get out in front of it fast and vocally, and it helps if you have others who may have some credibility come to your defense. I know, it is highly debatable whether any lobbyist has credibility, but we will give her the benefit of the doubt.

    I am not a friend of Jack Tate. But unlike Randy Baumgardner and Paul Rosenthal, he is aggressively defending himself. Lesbock is out there responding to the charges against him but his defense is to claim that he is real victim.

  5. ModeratusModeratus says:

    Wow political correctness really takes the color out of life. You poor hateful libs.

Leave a Reply

Comment from your Facebook account


You may comment with your Colorado Pols account above (click here to register), or via Facebook below.