CO-04 (Special Election) See Full Big Line

(R) Greg Lopez

(R) Trisha Calvarese

90%

10%

President (To Win Colorado) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Biden*

(R) Donald Trump

80%

20%↓

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

90%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

90%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(D) Adam Frisch

(R) Jeff Hurd

(R) Ron Hanks

40%

30%

20%↑

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert

(R) Deborah Flora

(R) J. Sonnenberg

50%↑

15%

10%↓

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Crank

(R) Dave Williams

60%↑

40%↓

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

90%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) Brittany Pettersen

85%↑

 

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(R) Gabe Evans

(R) Janak Joshi

60%↑

40%↑

20%↓

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
May 28, 2020 10:53 AM UTC

Colorado Republicans Had One Bad Option; They Took It

  • 18 Comments
  • by: Colorado Pols
Guess which road Colorado Republicans chose?

Nobody asked us to give a commencement speech this year, but if we had been tapped for such an honor, we might have given this advice: Never select the obvious worst choice when considering how to approach a particular endeavor.

In other words, don’t follow the example of Colorado Republican lawmakers.

The Colorado legislature reconvened this week after a two-month coronavirus break in order to address a couple of pandemic-related issues but mostly to pass legislation that lawmakers are constitutionally-bound to complete, such as a balanced state budget. With a Democrat in the Governor’s office and a minority in both legislative chambers, Colorado Republicans don’t have a lot of opportunities to advance their agenda, so it was relatively difficult for them to make a major mistake in the final weeks of the 2020 session. Nonetheless, they persevered and found a way.

State Rep. Richard Holtorf (R-Dumbass)

The worst thing that Republicans could have done in Legislative Session 2.0 would have been to take every opportunity to fire off inane and offensive statements about the perils of social distancing and the annoyances of wearing masks while Democrats worked dutifully on relevant legislative needs. But the GOP just couldn’t help itself, with members complaining about COVID-19 safety precautions, arguing against remote participation, and berating sick colleagues for not not risking their lives to be at the State Capitol with them. Kyle Clark of 9News summed up Wednesday’s proceedings with one sentence:

Today it turned into a battle between legislators who have pre-existing health conditions and another who suggested that they are sissies. 

This is not inaccurate, as we noted yesterday. The only silver lining for Colorado Republicans is this: At least they didn’t hide the fact that one of their members was infected with COVID-19, which is what happened in Pennsylvania this week.

State Sen. Vicki Marble, left, doesn’t just talk down to Cub Scouts.

On Wednesday, Republican State Sen. Vicki Marble chided the legislature in telling a story about how she goes to Wal-Mart and doesn’t even bother sanitizing her grocery cart. State Rep. Richard Holtorf argued against remote participation by saying that other lawmakers wouldn’t be able to tell if he was drunk or not. State Sen. Bob Gardner said that allowing remote participation would make the state legislature akin to the Imperial Senate in Star Wars. State Rep. Larry Liston likened Republican courage in returning to the Capitol to Marines storming the beaches at Iwo Jima in WWII.

One of the lowest points of the day came after Holtorf accused absent lawmakers of being “AWOL,” which was a particularly insensitive statement for Democratic State Rep. Jovan Melton, who is recovering from pneumonia and acute heart failure related to COVID-19.

All of this came on the same day that the United States shot past the 100,000 death milestone from COVID-19. Voting along party lines, the legislature ultimately decided in favor of allowing remote participation in a public health crisis, rendering ridiculous Republican protests moot.

Meanwhile, legislative Democrats remained focused on trying to help Coloradans. As Audra Streetman reports for CBS4 Denver,

On Wednesday, Colorado lawmakers provided an overview of a newly introduced bill that would provide earned sick days to workers in the state. Under SB20-205, employees would earn a sick day for every 26 hours worked.

Senate Majority Leader Steve Fenberg and Senator Jeff Bridges, alongside Speaker of the House KC Becker and Representative Yadira Caraveo introduced the legislation, saying it will empower Colorado workers to protect themselves and their coworkers during the COVID-19 pandemic…

…According to a 2003 study published in the Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, employees working while sick costs the national economy approximately $160 billion per year.

Republicans could have come up with a proactive idea like this, but they chose a different route.

The Colorado GOP got trounced in the 2018 elections, spent most of 2019 attempting ridiculous failed recalls across the state, and are now heading into the 2020 election on a platform of anti-safety buffoonery. Democrats really couldn’t ask for much more from their political counterparts.

Comments

18 thoughts on “Colorado Republicans Had One Bad Option; They Took It

    1. And I thought the CO Republican Party was too extreme for my tastes as an NY Republican back in 2000. At least I could reach for some rationale for that party's actions; 2020 Republicans by and large are so far out there I can't even emulate them for Devil's Advocate. Is it all just about spite or totally self-centered thinking?

      1. Just take a look at the masks.  It's another " the libz are for it so I'm against it " issue now, and it is the epitome of self-centered asinine behavior.

        1. GOP governor offers emotional plea to the anti-mask crowd: Stop this senseless culture war

          Across the border in North Dakota, though, GOP Gov. Doug Burgum on Friday offered a plea to stop the madness.

          Burgum suggested the debate over masks was being needlessly politicized and that those who are bucking federal health officials' guidance should rethink their posture.

          "I would really love to see in North Dakota that we could just skip this thing that other parts of the nation are going through where they're trading a divide – either it's ideological or political or something – around masks versus no mask," Burgum said. "This is a, I would say, senseless dividing line, and I would ask people to try to dial up your empathy and your understanding."

          The subtext of the remarks was pretty clear: This is a needless culture war.

          Burgum then want on, getting emotional.

    2. We once had such greats as John Love, Bill Owens, Hank Brown, Fred Anderson, Dick Plock, Carl Gustafson and a host of others.   Now, only imbeciles as far ad the eye can see.  And KevinPriola.  How long can he last?

        1. Does anyone know how Perry Will is doing in the legislature? Perry was my neighbor on Silt Mesa. I have a very fond recollection of Perry and find it hard to believe he would buy in to the insanity of his party.

      1. Thanks. I noticed RVAT earlier today on Yahoo, but it's a busy day and hadn't had a chance yet to publicize it here.

        RVAT.org = Republican Voters Against Trump.

  1. The bill as initially filed says sick leave of "one hour of paid sick leave for every 30 hours worked, up to a maximum of 48 hours."  6 days off after 36 weeks of full time work. 

    Not TOO onerous.  And it may limit the contagion factor and potential for other liabilities.

  2. One bad option is hardly a choice for our Nevillettes . . .

    . . . from now on they should be given at least two bad options so they can select “both,” or “all of the above.”

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

79 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!