Notable Links



Denver Internet Marketing by Parallel Path

Knowledge Messenger

Arvada Boutique Clothing Store Stella B's

Faced With "Tea Party" Revolt, McInnis Begs For Their Support

by: Colorado Pols

Fri Dec 04, 2009 at 14:39:21 PM MST


Local "Tea Party" conservatives were none too pleased by gubernatorial candidate Scott McInnis' appearance on Fox News Wednesday, where he was enthusiastically introduced by host Neil Cavuto as the "biggest Tea Party candidate in the country." Not only has McInnis most emphatically not earned any formal endorsement from the local 'teabaggers,' they are apparently deeply upset about having been misrepresented on national television as supporters of a candidate who is already backing off the promises he made to conservatives just a couple of weeks ago.

Nobody seems quite sure who put the idea in Neil Cavuto's brain that McInnis is "the biggest Tea Party candidate in the country." There was an article in the Wall Street Journal the day before that talked about how candidates like McInnis are patterning their message to appeal to these folks, but there's no rational way you would proceed from that to "biggest Tea Party candidate in the country." Somebody put this fiction on Cavuto's teleprompter for a reason.

Regardless of the origins, it seems very unlikely that McInnis would have had no idea how he would be portrayed in this interview--"the biggest Tea Party candidate in the country"--and it's impossible to believe that McInnis would have heard what Cavuto was saying and not seen a need to correct him: that is, if his goal to was be truthful. We think it's evident that McInnis was perfectly happy with being characterized as the "Tea Party-backed candidate" for the purposes of this Fox News piece, and only after the backlash ensued did he decide to "correct" the record.

Here's what McInnis says today, in a statement posted to his website:

Yesterday in an interview on the FOX News Channel, Scott spoke about his campaign's early success in rallying support against the Democrat Governor Bill Ritter.  FOX News implied that Scott is the TEA Party candidate.  This however was not accurate.  Scott has never implied the endorsement of the TEA Party organization, and would not be so presumptive to claim an endorsement that doesn't exist...

Scott has a great deal of respect for the TEA Party groups, and recognizes the significance of their contribution to the discussion taking place around conservative values and governing principles that will get Colorado back on track to prosperity.

He would be honored to have these groups join in with his campaign's growing coalition of support and will continue to work hard for their votes just as he continues to work for the votes of every Coloradan.

Clearly, he should start with the anti-McInnis Tea Party.

UPDATE: There's another angle here worth considering--the rest of the state's voters. The "Tea Party" contingent is vocal and highly visible, but their antics arguably turn off more voters than they attract. Liberal activist group Progress Now sent a release today, demanding that all gubernatorial candidates disavow their ties to the "Tea Party" movement. Text follows--says Mike Huttner, "Amazingly, right-wing Colorado politicians continue to embrace the 'Tea Party' movement after all they've done to discredit themselves...apparently, McInnis thinks that the belligerence and extremism on display at these rallies is what he needs to win."

To reinforce the point, they helpfully included a photo of "Swastika Guy."

Colorado Pols :: Faced With "Tea Party" Revolt, McInnis Begs For Their Support
Call for all Colorado gubernatorial candidates to immediately renounce "Tea Party" extremists

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Friday, December 4, 2009
CONTACT: Michael Huttner, Founder and CEO at 303-931-4547

DENVER--ProgressNow Colorado, the state's largest online progressive advocacy organization, today demanded that all candidates for Governor of Colorado immediately renounce ties to the racist and extremist "Tea Party" movement. The call comes after Scott "McLobbyist" McInnis was featured on Fox News' Your World With Neil Cavuto as a "Tea Party Backed Candidate."

"The extremist 'Tea Party' fringe represents the very worst in American politics today," said ProgressNow Colorado founder Michael Huttner. "From their racist questioning of President Barack Obama's citizenship to their support for irresponsible ballot measures like the 'Poundstone Amendment'--designed to destroy the state's ability to carry out core functions of government--'Tea Partiers' have no place in a civil dialogue about the future of this state or this country.

"Amazingly," Huttner continued, "right-wing Colorado politicians continue to embrace the 'Tea Party' movement after all they've done to discredit themselves. Earlier this week former congressman Scott McInnis was lauded on the right-wing Fox News Channel as the 'Tea Party Backed Candidate.' Apparently, McInnis thinks that the belligerence and extremism on display at these rallies is what he needs to win."

At numerous 'Tea Party' events held in Colorado since Obama became President, ProgressNow Colorado has documented racism and extremism on parade. Signs carried by Colorado 'Tea Partiers' this year have compared Obama to Hitler, the Soviet Union, and even a monkey (image at right). 'Tea Partiers' also strongly support the racist and xenophobic agenda of ex-congressman Tom Tancredo, as well as several extremist anti-government ballot initiatives slated to be voted on in Colorado next year.

"We call on all candidates for Governor--not just the one who claims the 'backing' of the 'Tea Party' fringe--to immediately condemn and renounce the agenda of these far right extremists," concluded Huttner. "Their agenda would seriously harm Colorado if it were ever to be enacted, and no serious candidate for higher office should give them the time of day."

Watch the video of McInnis on Fox News: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v...

###

Tags: (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
I'm sure....
McInnis gives a rats ass what Michael Huttner thinks

"Religion is for people who don't want to go to hell. Spirituality is for people who've been there, and don't want to go back"



Uh
It's not about what Huttner thinks. Everyone knows what he thinks.

What will the voters who don't hang with "Swastika Guy" think? That seems a little more important.


[ Parent ]
Dunno
My first thought was that Huttner should SHUT UP and let McInnis get as far in bed with the teabaggers as he wants to. Like Pols says, the teabaggers are more of a hindrance to McInnis in the general than a help.

But the teabaggers aren't into McLobbyist, and he's already trying to have it Both Ways Bob with them, so maybe it's better to make the embarrassment stand out?

Repeat after me: "I have never supported Dan Maes.  I have always supported [Dick Wadhams to fill in the blank]." --ClubTwitty


[ Parent ]
I think, JeffcoBlue,
the teabaggers aren't going to GET into Scooty Boy, either. I think they will eventually run a candidate, line up en masse for Maes, or just sit it out.

I just don't believe there is any ammunition in McInnis' armory that can get a REAL Tea Partier to sidle up to Scooter (I loves me some Tom Delay) McLobbyist.

And the men who hold high places, must be the ones to start, to mold a new reality, closer to the heart. Rush/ 1977


[ Parent ]
What Demoncrats fear
Is a united Republican Party. That's why you talk about our problems and not your own. YOu have plenty: the Dem base hates Bennet and Rotter. Why don't we talk about that instead of something that will be worked out in a matter of days?

Do you think that ANY of the TEA Party will vote for Rotter? You've got rocks in your heads.

"The Democratic Party is going to experience a bloodbath in November." -- Colorado Pols editor MotR


What's a "Demoncrat?"
Is that a new pejorative from someone who has no ideas of his own?

Consider me a dumbass.  Enquiring minds want to know.

Best to kill them early instead of letting them possibly need food stamps.
--marilou, 2010


[ Parent ]
No one I know fears a "united Republican Party" more than
the Republicans who just aren't R enough. You call 'em RINOS - I never bothered.

I call it purging or cleansing.

But what would the R party unified look like?
Would there be more or less social issues being legislated? ie, regulated?
Would there be more or fewer debt financed elective wars based on lies and fake intel?
Would there be more or less insanity about Hawaii not being a part of the US?
Would there be more or less fantasizing about Committee Chairwomen in their underwear?
Would there be more or less wishing AIDS on unwed moms?
Would there be more or less reckless elimination of public investment in infrastructure ?
Would there be more or less F22s?


[ Parent ]
You forgot PiƱon Canyon
Military base, or still people's property?

"I'll take incompetence over a business model incentivised to kill me any day." -- DtR(H)

[ Parent ]
Well, if I were a betting man
and there were someway to actually settle such a wager, I would bet that the Tea Party base "hates" the Scootster much more that the Dem base "hates" Ritter.

But, lacking empirical data, it's just subjective...eh?

And the men who hold high places, must be the ones to start, to mold a new reality, closer to the heart. Rush/ 1977


[ Parent ]
dukeco, we agree on that
My take is that some, perhaps several, portions of the Dem base are unenthusiastic about Gov. Ritter.  The Tea Bag Base, OTOH, hates Scooter McLobbyist.  The more the Tea Bag Base screams and shouts, the more motivated the Dem base will become.  So I say--bring on the Tea Baggers!  Make McLobbyist grovel for their support and come up short.  

"[A]ll Republicans/conservatives/tea parties have been proven wrong. Everybody knows this." BJWilson83, Republican/conservative/tea partier

"The fossil record utterly refutes evolution." BJWilson83, graduate student


[ Parent ]
Charming, as always
Your message of love through racism and peace through intimidation is sure to attract lots of voters.

Bring back S[redacted]e H[redacted]y!

[ Parent ]
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?




Advertise Here!
ads@coloradopols.com


Active Users
Currently 51 user(s) logged on.

Search




Advanced Search


Colorado Pols Network


Jeffco Pols
  More >

Denver Pols
  More >















RSS 2.0



Pols Gets Mobile: ColoradoPols.com/mobile/

Colorado Pols is on Twitter: twitter.com/coloradopols

Email Pols


How to Write a Diary That Will Make the Front Page



Terms of Use/Privacy Policy



Pols Posting Policies



The Pols "Mailbag"

Mailbag #1



Relevant Links

The Big Media Blog

Blog It Right

Blog For Growth

Blogometer

Colorado Capitol Journal

Colorado Center on Law and Policy

Colorado Democratic Party

Colorado Ethics Watch

Colorado Independent

Colorado Labor Blog

Colorado Veterans for America

Colorado Legislature

Colorado Lib

Colorado Libertarian Blog

Colorado Media Matters

Colorado Progressive Coalition

Colorado Republican Party

Colorado Secretary of State

Colorado Senate

Colorado Young Democrats

Commentary Today

Coyote Gulch

CU Democrats

Curious Stranger

Daily Kos

Dan Willis-Rumors

Dem Notes

Democracy for Colorado

Denver Politics

East Boulder County Politics

Ed Stein Ink

Election Neutrality Now

George in Denver

Great Education Colorado

Head First Colorado

The Hotline Political Network

Junction Daily Blog

Left in the West

Liberal and Loving It

Maintain Educational Standards in Colorado

Mount Virtus

MyDD

National Journal

On Call

Peak Dems

Political State Report

Progress Now

Prometheus

Project Vote Smart

Radio Free Denver

Senate Guru

Slapstick Politics

Steam Powered Opinions

Square State

Stygius

TalkLeft

The Thicket

The Bell Policy Center

The Hypothetical Wren

ThomasMC.com

Toilet Paper Online

TRACER Campaign Finance

View From a Height

Walter in Denver

Wash Park Prophet

Western Democrat



Colorado Pols is wholly owned by www.ColoradoPols.com, LLC
webmaster-at-coloradopols.com
Powered by: SoapBlox