U.S. Senate See Full Big Line

(D) J. Hickenlooper*

(D) Julie Gonzales

(R) Janak Joshi

80%

40%

20%

(D) Michael Bennet

(D) Phil Weiser
55%

50%↑
Att. General See Full Big Line

(D) Jena Griswold

(D) M. Dougherty

(D) Hetal Doshi

50%

40%↓

30%

Sec. of State See Full Big Line
(D) J. Danielson

(D) A. Gonzalez
50%↑

20%↓
State Treasurer See Full Big Line

(D) Jeff Bridges

(D) Brianna Titone

(R) Kevin Grantham

50%↑

40%↓

30%

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

(D) Wanda James

(D) Milat Kiros

80%

20%

10%↓

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Hurd*

(D) Alex Kelloff

(R) H. Scheppelman

60%↓

40%↓

30%↑

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert*

(D) E. Laubacher

(D) Trisha Calvarese

90%

30%↑

20%

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Crank*

(D) Jessica Killin

55%↓

45%↑

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) B. Pettersen*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(R) Gabe Evans*

(D) Shannon Bird

(D) Manny Rutinel

45%↓

30%

30%

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors

Winners and Losers of 2012: Losers

After a few days of reflection, here is our list of losers from the 2012 election cycle in Colorado. Find our list of winners here.

1. Mitt Romney and Colorado Advisors

Mitt Romney’s campaign efforts in Colorado never made much sense to us. Romney spent far too long early in the campaign visiting traditionally beet-red, but more importantly under-populated areas of the state, allowing the battle for suburban votes to shift toward President Barack Obama. Some 85% of Colorado voters live along the Front Range between Ft. Collins and Pueblo, which we would think is fairly common knowledge at this point. At one point at the end of the summer, Romney had gone more than 30 days between visits to our state.

Later, Romney made a disastrous mistake by declaring himself opposed to the wind power production tax credit, which is tied to thousands of manufacturing jobs in Colorado–even though almost all Republicans in the state supported it. By the time Romney began to “Etch-a-Sketch” himself into a moderate candidate for the general election, he had already radicalized himself in the eyes of too many Colorado voters. Once that was done, his attempts to walk back from the hard-right positions he took in the primary looked disingenuous and fed distrust.

But above all, Republican supporters of Romney in Colorado disastrously internalized their own spin, and convinced themselves that polls showing Obama steadily regaining, then holding his lead in Colorado from mid-October onward were “skewed.” This false sense of security, combined with the Obama campaign’s world-beating field campaign, yanked the rug out from under Romney’s feet in a state that consistently ranked as one of the most competitive.

2. Frank McNulty

Outgoing Colorado House Speaker Frank McNulty will go down in history as one of the most divisive, Machiavellian, and ultimately self-destructive leaders in the history of the state. Taking a one-seat majority in 2010 by the barest of electoral margins, McNulty acted as if this was a mandate for the “Tea Party.” Abusing and manipulating legislative rules to an extent nobody we know can remember a match for, McNulty ruthlessly carried out a partisan, obstructionist game plan in the House against the Democratic Senate and Governor’s office.

But McNulty’s arrogance was his own undoing. McNulty lost control of the legislative reapportionment process through his own bad faith, resulting in maps that dramatically reduced the number of “safe” seats for either party. Then McNulty turned the 2012 legislative session into a nationwide controversy when he shut down debate just before civil unions legislation would have passed his chamber with bipartisan support.

As a result, outside money poured into key legislative races, and Democrats used the story of the shutdown of the legislature against Republican House candidates all over the state. Today, not even a candidate for GOP House minority leadership, the implosion of Frank McNulty’s political career is pretty much complete.

If You Liked Laura Bradford, You’ll LOVE Rep.-Elect Jared Wright

Charles Ashby of the Grand Junction Sentinel reports:

Embattled Republican Jared Wright won the seat to represent House District 54 Tuesday night.

The 29-year-old who faced calls for his ouster from members of his own party because of numerous scandals won 58 percent of the vote, defeating Tim Menger, the Libertarian Party candidate who didn’t expect to be much of a challenger in the race…

Wright joined other Republicans at its campaign-night event held at Two Rivers Convention Center.

But unlike other Republicans at the event, such as state Rep. Ray Scott and U.S. Rep. Scott Tipton, Wright didn’t address the crowd.

Jared Wright, as we’ve discussed, is the once-beloved Republican candidate for HD-54 charged with salvaging the party’s sacred honor in the wake of Rep. Laura Bradford’s career flameout–after her questionable traffic stop in Denver last January, and allegations, later swept under the rug, that Bradford invoked legislative immunity to prevent a DUI arrest.

The problem is that Mr. Wright has been just as, if not more embarrassing to the GOP than Bradford was. Wright resigned under a cloud from the Fruita Police Department after an investigation revealed he was regularly clocking in for work while still at home. Later it was disclosed that Wright had a very large amount of consumer debt for which he filed bankruptcy last year, including such examples of fiscal responsibility as tanning memberships and multiple cars. Local Republicans spent the rest of the election trying to persuade Wright to withdraw.

Well folks, not only did Wright fail to listen, he and his baggage are headed to Denver!

John Morse Wins Colorado Senate Presidency

UPDATE: Sen. John Morse defeats Sen. Pat Steadman in a second round of voting after the withdrawal of Sen. Rollie Heath; Morse is the new President of the Colorado Senate.

Sen. Lucia Guzman is elected Senate President pro tempore, and Sen. Morgan Carroll elected Majority Leader.

—–

That’s the battle playing out right now; we’ll update with results shortly.

Will the GOP ever learn?

I wrote about the challenges of the GOP 3 years ago, here: http://www.coloradopols.com/di…

From what I can see, and continue to read, the GOP has completely failed to adapt to the changing political landscape.  Others have written extensively on the reasons Mr. Romney lost – and, in my view, he lost rather decisively.  The race was not as close as many Republicans would like to believe, and the demographic trends are not in their favor.  

The GOP’s blind and headlong race to oblivion is not a positive development in American politics.  We as a country thrive when our elected representatives can talk to, and work with, each other.  We need them to approach representing us not with hellfire and brimstone, but with reason and understanding of the broader context in which they work.  

The GOP should be concerned that despite putting forward their best candidate in Mr. Romney that they lost so decisively.  While there is talk of the need of the GOP to be more inclusive, I would point out that the same talk took place after the 2008 election.  Nothing, it seems, has changed.  

Rep. Mark Waller Elected GOP Minority Leader

UPDATE #4: Despite rumors to the contrary reported by FOX 31 and elsewhere, outgoing House Speaker Frank McNulty will not resign his HD-43 seat.

—–

UPDATE #3: Statement from Minority Leader-designee Mark Waller:

Today, House Republicans unanimously elected state Rep. Mark Waller, R-Colorado Springs, to lead them into the 69th General Assembly, which begins January 9, 2013. House Republicans also elected the following members to leadership positions: state Rep. Libby Szabo, R-Arvada, as Assistant Minority Leader; state Rep. Kathleen Conti, R-Littleton, as Caucus Chair; and state Rep. Kevin Priola, R-Henderson, as Caucus Whip.

“As we head into the 69th General Assembly, House Republicans will continue our focus on job creation, economic recovery and prioritizing more money for education,” said Minority Leader Waller. “We look forward to continuing to work together with our friends across the aisle to build a better Colorado for our state’s hardworking families.”

Speaker Frank McNulty, R-Highlands Ranch, who did not seek a leadership position added: “I am very proud of our House Republican caucus and congratulate Reps. Waller, Szabo, Conti, and Priola on their leadership election this morning. Our House GOP showed over the last two years that Republicans and Democrats can work together. My priorities remain the same – to help create an environment for job creation and to focus on prioritizing funding to ensure a quality education for all of Colorado’s students.”

—–

UPDATE #2: First statement from new Minority Leader Mark Waller, via Ivan Moreno:



—–

UPDATE: Rep. Mark Waller the sole nominee for GOP Minority Leader.

—–

A poll follows.

RERUN: GOP Extinction?

Friends, two years ago, as we watched the GOP storm Washington with electoral gains, we shuddered in fear. Tea Party bigotry seemed to have become the new political norm. I am going to self-aggrandize now, but two years ago, on this day, I boldly wrote an editorial outlining why the GOP’s bigotry would ultimately lead to their extinction, not their vindication.

I am relinking my article from two years ago, as a celebratory rerun. All of us ‘liberals’ and ‘progressives’ (even fiscal conservative ones, like me) should stand proud today that we did not give up. Well done, friends.

Any front-paging is appreciated!

– Miguel Ali (formerly Muhammad Ali Hasan)

http://www.coloradopols.com/sh…

Voters Reject Islamophobic Candidates

In 2012, voters were generally more progressive than their elected representatives. Two states legalized recreational use of marijuana. Four states voted in favor of marriage equality. The list goes on. Around the country, voters took matters into their own hands, often over the objections of elected officials.

Simultaneously, right-wing Republicans’ years-long campaign of Islamophobic fear-mongering failed spectacularly at the polls. Around the country, candidates bet on turning out the Republican base with threats of “Sharia law” and “radical Islam.” Voters turned out, but they delivered a resounding rebuke to candidates known for their vituperative anti-Muslim rhetoric.

Underdog challenger Patrick Murphy toppled Allen West by less than 2,500 votes. Congressman West is an Islamophobe so vicious that he stooped to attack the country’s only Muslim Congressman:

West used his time in Congress to press his case that Islam is “not a religion” but a “totalitarian theocratic political ideology,” and that terrorism is inherent to the faith-not radical Islam, but Islam, writ large. He’s accused a fellow Member of Congress, Rep. Keith Ellison (D-MN), a Muslim, of “represent(ing) the antithesis of the principles upon which this country was established.”

The Daily Beast

More below:

105 Votes Separate Hudak, Sias in SD-19

UPDATE: With more ballots counted, incumbent Sen. Evie Hudak’s margin has grown to 332 votes.

—–

We’re not waiting on the outcome of any races to determine control of either chamber of the Colorado General Assembly this morning (lest any bad memories of 2010 and Robert Ramirez’s agonizing 198-vote win resurface). But as of this writing, a mere 105 votes separate the two candidates for Colorado Senate District 19, the always-close battle between incumbent Evie Hudak and GOP challenger Lang Sias:

Evie Hudak (D) 46.89% 31,669 votes

Lang Sias (R) 46.74% 31,564 votes

Lloyd Sweeny (L) 6.37% 4,303 votes

This one looks headed for recount and ballot-cure glory, folks.

Poll: Who Will Win in HD-23?

Thousands of Lakewood residents are probably sick of hearing about the HD-23 race between Dem Rep. Max Tyler and Republican challenger Rick Enstrom. Although the district favors Tyler on paper with Democrats holding a nearly 2,500 person registration lead, Republicans and right-leaning outside groups see the seat as a potential pickup, plastering central Lakewood with a handful of billboards, mail pieces, and television ads in heavy rotation. Democratic groups have also gone all out defending the incumbent, seizing on Enstrom’s 1985 arrest for selling drug paraphernalia in scathing TV buys and a slew of nasty – and sometimes comical – direct mail pieces.

Voters will have their final say tonight, of course, but in line with our coverage of this and other races over the past year, we want to know: Who do you think will win in HD-23, Max Tyler or Rick Enstrom?

A poll follows, and sound off in the comments below.

Nothing to say

Right now.  Right right now I only got one thing:

The rest can wait.

🙂

<    smiling and breathing   >

BwahahahahahahahBwahahahahahahahBwahahahahahahah

BwahahahahahahahBwahahahahahahahBwahahahahahahah

BwahahahahahahahBwahahahahahahahBwahahahahahahah

BwahahahahahahahBwahahahahahahahBwahahahahahahah

BwahahahahahahahBwahahahahahahahBwahahahahahahahBwa

hahahahahahahBwahahaha

Ok….ok….whew….ok

I do have something to say….

Mailer Made Real

As soon as residents of Colorado House District 3 got this mailer in mid-October:

About GOP candidate Brian Watson and his well-publicized tax troubles and featuring a banner towed by a plane, we should have predicted this followup, now orbiting over the district:

It’s synergy, people. Remember that mailer you looked at for ten seconds and threw away?

It’s in the sky now!

Poll: Who Will Win in HD-3?

Arapahoe County’s HD-3 skirmish between Democrat Dan Kagan and Republican Brian Watson has always been a case study in reapportionment. Kagan, first appointed to the seat after Anne McGihon’s 2009 resignation, has been a darling of the left since first taking office. Unabashedly liberal and a speaker who somehow marries brashness and eloquence, Kagan was the perfect fit for South Denver’s Democratic tilt. With redrawn lines, though, Kagan lost all his consistently-liberal voting base and picked up affluent and largely conservative neighborhoods in Greenwood Village and Cherry Hills Village.

Republican opponent Brian Watson, at first blush, appeared to be the ideal candidate for the seat. A moderate with extensive business experience, Watson should’ve been able to energize the district’s conservatives without alienating the 13,000 unaffiliated voters critical to victory. The Republican, however, has been dogged by his failure to pay hundreds of thousands of dollars in property taxes from past business enterprises. Watson’s been one of the top fundraisers in the state, of course, but the $250,000 in his campaign coffers pales in comparison to the $279,000 he owes to the IRS and he’s been brutally attacked in mail pieces and over the air for his questionable business record.

HD-3 is one of those races that could shift the balance of power in the State House. With polls closing in just a few hours, we want to know: Who do you think will win in HD-3? Remember, we’ll know if you’re right or wrong by the end of the day, so make it count.

A poll follows.  

The “Anti-Katrina?” TABOR’s Contradictions Laid Bare By Sandy

As Politico reports, something big just happened in the aftermath of Hurricane Sandy: President Barack Obama and New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie cemented their new-found mutual admiration society on Wednesday, as the men gushed with praise for one another while touring damage from Hurricane Sandy on the devastated Jersey Shore… During the press statement and […]

The Irony in Michael Hancock’s Opposition to Amendment 64

Denver Mayor Michael Hancock last week announced his opposition to Amendment 64 — the regulate Marijuana Like Alcohol Act — citing fears that Colorado may lose valuable tourism money if Denver is perceived as a “marijuana capital.” He then waxed emphatic about the link between marijuana, hard drugs, and the cost of legalization on society:

“You can argue that with a lot of the things that are illegal, right — if you know that it’s occurring and where it’s occurring and where it’s allowed. The realities are this: I think the cost to society with people who graduate from marijuana to harsher drugs is exponentially higher than any benefit that someone may try to calculate that you’ll get from a…regulated marijuana industry,”he said. “I just find it very hard. Those of us who grew up where the advent and introduction of some of the harsher drugs, whether it’s heroin, whether it was PCP, crack cocaine, we know a lot of our family members and neighbors started with recreational use of marijuana.”

Hancock’s anecdote on the topic is compelling, and his personal history probably should inform his professional take on drug policy. But it’s hard to reconcile his belief in the pitfalls of marijuana use with some of the most prominent content on his city website.

Hancock dismisses comparisons between alcohol and marijuana use, telling Westword that “We’re talking marijuana, so I’m not going to talk about the comparisons with alcohol.” Fair enough.

Still, for someone who’s proud to showcase his pride in Denver’s beer, Hancock would do well to remember some of the arguments made in favor of prohibiting that substance.

Here are a select few quotes from temperance leader Billy Sunday:

Listen! Seventy-five per cent of our idiots come from intemperate parents, 80 per cent of the paupers, 82 per cent of the crime is committed by men under the influence of liquor, 90 per cent of the adult criminals are whiskey made.

Archbishop Ireland, the famous Roman Catholic of St. Paul, said of social crime “that 75 per cent is caused by drink and 80 per cent of the poverty.” I go to a family and it is broken up and I say, “what caused this?” Drink! I step up to a young man on the scaffold and say, “what brought you here?” Drink! Whence all the misery and sorrow and corruption? Invariably it is drink.

The saloon is the sum of all villainies. It is worse than war or pestilence. It is the crime of crimes. It is parent of crimes and the mother of sins. It is the appalling source of misery and crime in the land and the principal cause of crime. It is the source of three-fourths of the taxes to support that crime. And to license such an incarnate fiend of hell is the dirtiest, low-down, damnable business on top of this old earth. There is nothing to be compared to it.

It is the moral clearinghouse for rot, and damnation, and poverty, and insanity, and it wrecks homes and blights lives today. The saloon is a liar. It promises health and causes disease. It promises prosperity and sends adversity. It promises happiness and sends misery.

There’s nothing wrong with Hancock’s opposition to Amendment 64 — there are a few compelling reasons, practical tourism interests included, to keep marijuana illegal at a state-level in Colorado.

Hancock, however, shouldn’t be blind to the irony in preaching “slippery slope” talking points about marijuana and other drugs while at the same time highlighting Denver’s beer culture on his government website.

There are other practical realities at play, but that doesn’t change the fact that many of the arguments he uses against marijuana, after all, were first employed to prohibit the beer he’s holding in his hand.  

Et Tu, Robert Ramirez?

Be honest, folks–would you, as a representative in one of Colorado’s most narrowly divided swing districts, post this on your Facebook page? This close to the elections?

Say it ain’t so, Rep. Robert Ramirez (R-Westminster by 197 votes):

It’s like Donald Trump and Glenn Beck threw up all over Ramirez’s profile.

Again, the goal this close to the elections is to not do things that pointlessly turn people off. Meaning if you believe Obama is (insert widely discredited conspiracy theory), you save it for after you win your extremely competitive race with control of the entire chamber at stake.

We’re honestly surprised to see it. Why would Ramirez choose now to reveal his inner crazy?

Originally posted at Colorado Pols.

In Case There Were Any Questions About Labuda’s Ties to Payday Lenders…

State Representative Jeanne Labuda, a lock to win her last-ever reelection campaign against quixotic Republican opponent John Kidd, caught flack during her divisive primary with activist Corrie Houck for comparing payday-lending customers to “alcoholics.” One of five Democrats to vote against the ultimately-successful bill to limit payday loan interest rates, Labuda has always been seen as something of an ally of the payday lending industry as a whole.

And, if her campaign finance reports are any indication, industry leaders are all too happy to return the favor.

Among contributions from Speedy Cash executives and the America Cash Advance Centers PAC, Labuda last month received a maxed-out check from William Allan Jones, the CEO of Check Into Cash and a trailblazer in the payday lending business credited with “pioneering the retail concept of providing short-term cash advances for a fee.” The so-called “founder” of payday lending has also been criticized for his “predatory loan shark” practices and esurient lifestyle — he owns a 400-acre home, a 223 acre ranch in Wyoming, a 157-foot yacht, and a private regulation-sized football field.

It’s hard to find a starker contrast between a business owner and his patrons anywhere.

Of course, ignoring the criticisms levelled against his industry’s practices, it’s fair to say that Jones wants to continue doing business in Colorado and personal contributions allow him to support candidates that will keep Check Into Cash locations open across the state. Indeed, over the past ten years the company has spent over $10,000 here supporting legislative candidates and leadership PACs.

Jones injected himself personally into Colorado politics for the first time this year, however, writing checks to HD-18 Republican candidate Jennifer George, SD-19 Republican Lang Sias, and, of course, HD-1 Democrat Jeanne Labuda. Unlike those Republicans, however, Labuda isn’t in a competitive race that could determine the partisan makeup of the Colorado legislature or the future of payday lending. She’s going to win with or without Jones’ support.

His contribution, then, looks less like an effort to protect his business from regulation and more like a reward for Labuda’s loyalty over the years.

Those are bad optics for the Denver Democrat. Labuda claimed to have voted against payday-lending regulation because she wanted to “see if existing procedures work.” That may be true, but whatever her intentions, accepting this contribution makes it appear as though she’s in the pocket of one of the most reviled leaders of the payday lending industry.

Too bad for Corrie Houck that Jones didn’t contribute during the primary.

Poor Robert Ramirez

Poor Robert Ramirez. The Republican legislator running for re-election in HD-29 has had troubles with his own campaign materials. Now outside political groups trying to help Ramirez aren’t doing him any favors. A recent mail piece sent out by the “Colorado Leadership Fund” doesn’t make it clear whether you are supposed to like or dislike Ramirez at first glance.

Ramirez was less than pleased with the mail piece when contacted by the Denver newspaper, and we don’t blame him. The other side of the mailer does try to paint Ramirez as a strong supporter of public schools, but given that most people only take a passing look at direct mail this time of year, the message needs to be a lot more obvious. If you only saw this side of the mailer, would you assume that it was a positive piece?

Shooting The Superintendent, And Other Classy School Board Moments

9NEWS reported Monday night and we wanted to make sure our readers saw:

A Jefferson County School board member has apologized after she agreed with a Denver radio host that the school’s superintendent should be shot.

Radio host Jason Worley, of 560 AM, made the comment about Jefferson County Superintendent Cindy Stevenson in reference to the school’s budget.

Worley said, “If you have a [full-time] Facebook person still in Jefferson County [on staff] your superintendent should be shot.”

Board member Laura Boggs, who was on the radio to talk about a ballot initiative to increase taxes for education, agreed with the statement, but later said she was on her phone at the time and did not fully hear what Worley said.

Laura Boggs has been at the center of a number of controversies on the Jefferson County school board, becoming the first-ever member of that board to be censured for her consistently outrageous conduct. Boggs represents the “Tea Party” minority opposition, was a proud supporter of 2010’s “Bad Three” ballot initiatives after voting to oppose them officially, and is presently working against a mill levy and bond issue campaign for the district she serves.

This is evidently how shooting the superintendent came up.

Incidentally, there is no “full time Facebook person” on staff at Jefferson County Schools. This is just one of many such particularly fact-challenged talking points employed by the campaign against Jefferson County’s Issues 3A and 3B. Ms. Boggs should certainly know better.

But as far as superintendent Cindy Stevenson is concerned, we’re kind of past that.

Originally posted at Colorado Pols.

Shooting The Superintendent, And Other Classy School Board Moments

9NEWS reported Monday night and we wanted to make sure our readers saw: A Jefferson County School board member has apologized after she agreed with a Denver radio host that the school’s superintendent should be shot. Radio host Jason Worley, of 560 AM, made the comment about Jefferson County Superintendent Cindy Stevenson in reference to […]

Presidential Candidates in Denver This Week

Just three weeks after they faced off at the University of Denver’s Sturm Hall, presidential candidates Barack Obama and Mitt Romney will concurrently be making a late-game sweep of the Denver metro area this week.

Romney and running mate Paul Ryan will, perplexingly, be hosting a “Victory Rally” at Red Rocks tomorrow evening, fewer than 24 hours after the Republican sits down with the president for their third and final debate this cycle. The GOP ticket will be joined on stage by country musician Rodney Atkins and “rapper” Kid Rock. Although (paradoxically) Mitt Romney counts a few endorsements from those in the porn industry, his appearance with Kid Rock likely marks the first time he’ll ever appear on stage with someone who features prominently in a sex tape. Tickets are free, and if you consider yourself an “American Bad Ass,” you can pick them up here. Doors upen at 4:00 PM and the event begins at 6:30 PM.

President Barack Obama will also be in Denver this week, visiting City Park for a rally on Wednesday afternoon. Tickets are available for that event here and doors open at 12:00 PM.

Although Colorado is still very much in play this year, with only a few weeks left until polls close, this very well may be the last chance to get an up-close and in-person glimpse of either presidential candidate. There are other swing states, you know. It certainly marks the last time both will be here simultaneously.  

Kerr’s TABOR Vulnerability Comes to Bear

As the lead plaintiff in the lawsuit challenging TABOR’s constitutionality, State Representative Andy Kerr has always been vulnerable on tax policy in his SD-22 bid against Rep. Ken Summers. TABOR is a complex issue, as is the lawsuit bearing Kerr’s name, but both can easily be distilled by conservatives with one deceptively simple platitude: Andy Kerr wants to raise taxes.

Little surprise, then, that’s exactly the messaging that right-leaning Colorado Citizens for Accountable Government 527 is deploying against the Lakewood Democrat on basic cable.

Inherent in this commercial, of course, are certain perplexing inaccuracies. Andy Kerr is apparently so devious that not only was he able to “raise taxes,” he’s also filing a lawsuit against the amendment that makes it impossible for legislators to raise taxes. It’s an odd contradiction under scrutiny. Either Kerr already has the power to raise taxes, making the lawsuit moot, or he’s suing the people of Colorado so that he’s able to raise taxes, which apparently he can already do without the lawsuit? It just doesn’t make sense.

Most voters seeing this on television, however, won’t know the intricacies of TABOR or of the legislature at-large. They’ll simply hear that Andy Kerr is a liberal politician who has raised taxes in the past and, if elected this year, will raise taxes in the future.

That talking point is overplayed. Voters have heard the “Democrats want to raise taxes” canard thousands of times this cycle alone. It’s lost its teeth. Sure, Kerr is involved in a lawsuit loosely connected to “raising taxes,” but so many different candidates for so many different offices in Colorado have recently been attacked on the tax issue that ads like these get lost in the noise and are easy to shrug off as hyperbole.

The “doesn’t trust us” line doesn’t have legs either. Conservatives tend to believe that the entire state worships TABOR and considers its provisions sacrosanct. The truth of the matter is that most Coloradans, even Republicans, blame the amendment for Colorado’s slide into fiscal dysfunction.

Repeated attacks against Kerr over TABOR might have been able to shape the race early on, but at this juncture, the issue is too wonky and too hackneyed to really move the needle in Summers’ favor.  

Cheap Tricks In Denver Schools Bond Issue Race

UPDATE: A reverse IP lookup proves that “MarySeawell.com” is indeed the handiwork of Guerin Lee Green, close associate of DPS board member Andrea Merida and publisher of the obscure website The Cherry Creek News:

We’d say Green should have covered his tracks a lot better than this.

—–

Taking a brief moment to cover Ed News Colorado’s report yesterday:

Denver school board President Mary Seawell is investigating her legal options after an opponent of the district’s proposed $466 million bond issue sent emails to thousands of DPS staff members criticizing the proposal – and linking the criticism to Seawell.

On Tuesday, DPS employees and some community members received a lengthy email purporting to be sent from “dpsboardpresident@maryseawell.com” and stating district claims about its financial health are false.

It also echoes statements made by various critics of the bond, such as “53 percent of bond funds, or almost $250 million, will go to charter schools, while just 21 percent of DPS students attend these schools.” The organized opposition to the bond, No on 3B Denver, strongly denies any involvement…

Denver’s Question 3B is a $466 million bond issue being run together with a smaller mill levy override, Question 3A. Question 3B is supported by pretty much everybody–from the Denver Classroom Teachers’ Association and Great Education Colorado to the conservative-leaning group Stand for Children. As for the opposition…well, it’s complicated.

Actually, it’s not that complicated. It’s Andrea Merida and a crew of usual suspects.

As some of our readers know–some a bit too well–DPS board member Merida heads up an insurgent wing of the Board, which has been decidedly critical of DPS superintendent Tom Boasberg and his predecessor, now-Sen. Michael Bennet. Merida helped organize a failed recall attempt against fellow DPS board member Nate Easley, and discussions of that recall attempt became particularly nasty and personal in the comment sections of this blog.

To be perfectly honest, it’s the small-minded perniciousness and bitterness in these intra-DPS spats that make them so interesting to outside observers like ourselves–which of course doesn’t make it credible, just interesting. The petty rage from the Merida insurgency on the DPS Board, and the various actors in support of her campaigns against the majority, makes her notorious even though we’re not aware of a single one of these that has actually succeeded.

Merida’s opposition doesn’t even speak for the teacher’s union, which is on board with 3B. Apparently, as you can read in the fake email that’s the subject of Ed News’ story, there’s a fear that charter schools will receive a disproportionate amount of funds, but supporters tell us that’s totally unfounded. A loss on these ballot questions would be a serious problem for DPS’ future plans, and by extension Boasberg and others among Merida’s long list of enemies. But Merida’s opposition, without the support of traditional allies in the DCTA and elsewhere, has had to resort to Republican-style tax and debt arguments that seem a bit out of place in Denver.

The only thing we have left to add here is the possible identity of the fake domain at the heart of the latest controversy–maryseawell.com (which now displays a broken page result). The other reference to this domain we were able to find comes from this October 2nd story on a low-traffic website called The Cherry Creek News, owned by longtime Merida ally Guerin Green. It’s referenced in such a way that it’s quite clear the website is, if you will, a team effort.

The aforementioned prior dealings with Mr. Green make us happy to bring this to your attention, as well as those investigating DPS Board President Mary Seawell’s legal options.

Originally posted at Colorado Pols.

Fight Back Colorado: “We Don’t Need Robert Ramirez”

The pro-civil unions group Fight Back Colorado first entered the HD-29 race with a piercing mailer portraying State Rep. Robert Ramirez as too extreme for the Colorado House. Now, with three weeks left until election day, its taken the same messaging to television.

The strategy motivating this commercial is clear. Although Fight Back Colorado is committed to defeating “the state legislators who killed the civil unions bill in Colorado” neither this ad nor the previous mailer make any reference to civil unions.

That may appear odd on its face, especially considering that a majority of Coloradans favor civil unions legislation, but it’s hard to distill the complexities of marriage equality in 30 seconds. And, unlike attacking Ramirez on, say, abortion, there’s no guarantee that the civil unions issue will motivate the base to turnout and vote against him.

The truth of the matter is that there’s a whole host of issues over which Ramirez can be defeated. Civil unions may indeed be on the list, but it’s not as salient an attack as the standard fare social issues.

No matter the framing, however, consistent and repeated attacks on Ramirez and his political profile do nothing but benefit Democratic challenger Tracy Kraft-Tharp. She’s run such a robust campaign hitherto that Ramirez’s mistakes and outside spending only serve to seal the deal.

Denver Post’s 100% Risk-Free Status Quo Congressional Endorsements

We’re not going to take up too much time with it, but we wanted to provide a forum to discuss the Denver paper’s endorsements published in this weekend’s editions after a sneak preview Friday afternoon. Being the state’s newspaper of record, their endorsements can be significant (depending on the race), and will be used heavily […]

Colorado Hispanic Republicans Rally For Glorious Victory!

UPDATE: In response to questions about the photo below that have surfaced on a nationally prominent blog, we were forwarded another photo from yesterday’s Colorado Hispanic Republicans rally. Our source doesn’t want to misrepresent the size of yesterday’s crowd, and in all fairness, this second photo does show more people in attendance than the first. […]

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Gabe Evans
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

36 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!