I woke up this morning to the return salvo from the Hancock campaign. Last night around 5pm Chris Romer’s campaign sent two emails accusing Hancock of being soft on the Democratic shibboleth of Women’s choice. Before I even got the official email “from” Chris Romer I was forwarded it by Jeniffer Jacobson with the Romer campaign. That seemed a little uncoordinated. Also the link to article about what Hancock reportedly said did not actually work, it just redirected to the “Michael Hancock, where do you stand?” page on the Romer website encouraging us to write to Hancock. No actual information there.
The Hancock campaign fired back at about 9am with the breathless and mock surprised “Romer goes Negative!” that is the privilege of the first person to be attacked and endorsements by pro choice women and linking to Hancock getting a 100% rating from Planned Parenthood. Of a little interest to me was that my name was used by the Romer campaign in the form of “First Name,” where the salutation on the Hancock email was just “Dear Friend-“. Clearly the Romer campaign has either mort sophisticated software for emailing people or else Hancock’s campaign was pressed for time in jumping on this.
Clearly the gloves are off. Full text of the dueling announcements follows.
*Name*,
Michael Hancock, who refuses to say whether he’s pro-choice, also says it’s not an issue for Denver voters, and is unaware of the Mayor’s responsibilities on reproductive health care.
On Thursday, in response to a reporter’s question on the importance of women voters and choice in the Mayoral race, Hancock stated, “I think there comes a time as politicians we overreach and we talk about things we really don’t have an impact on. I’d rather talk about those issues that families told me they care about when I met with Highland Mommies, they didn’t talk about choice.”
According to Melanie Fitzroy, who lives in the Highlands neighborhood and is a member of the Highlands Mommies, “Just because we didn’t talk about choice doesn’t mean it’s not important.”
Join me in asking Chris’ opponent where he stands on this critical issue.
One of the reasons I endorsed Chris Romer is because he walks the walk on choice. I’m really troubled that Michael Hancock doesn’t appreciate the significant role the mayor plays when it comes to choice.
The Mayor’s responsibilities include:
* Appointments to the Denver Health and Hospital Authority Board of Directors, which sets policy for the most significant health system in Denver providing reproductive health care.
* Title X federal block grants administered by Denver’s Department of Health and Human Services which provides thousands of low-income Denver women reproductive health care services.
* Enforcement of provider/patient protection laws by the Denver Police Department and the City Attorney’s Office.
* Direct control of the enforcement of numerous laws protecting providers and patients in reproductive health, such as the 1994 Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrance (FACE) Act, making property destruction, obstruction, and other means of intimidation outside of health centers carry civil and criminal penalties.
* Implementing critical state and federal laws on choice issues in Denver such as HB 10-1021, requiring that all plans on the individual insurance market cover prenatal care and contraception, and prohibits pregnancy from being considered a pre-existing condition, going into effect January 1, 2011.
* Implementing state and federal funding and grants on reproductive issues.Click here to ask Chris’ opponent where he stands on choice.
We deserve better.
Sincerely,
Theresa Spahn
Former Mayoral Candidate
Romer for Mayor
www.RomerForMayor.com
Dear Friend –
Less than 72 hours into the run-off election, Michael’s opponent, Chris Romer, went negative yesterday. And worse yet, Chris got his facts completely wrong on where Michael stands on a woman’s right to choose. Michael is strongly pro-choice – and he just earned a 100 percent rating from Planned Parenthood.
Help Michael defend himself and fight back against Chris’ desperate attacks. Contribute $25, $50 or $100 today!
As pro-choice women, we are proud to support Michael in his campaign for mayor. But he’s going to need our help to overcome the type of deceptive campaign tactics we’re likely to see over the next 30 days.
Can you help Michael? Please consider donating to his campaign today.
Michael has spent the past six months campaigning and developing specific strategies to help lead Denver forward. He recently issued a First 100 Days in Office Plan and has concrete ideas that will turn around failing schools, create good jobs and eliminate the city’s budget deficit.
John Hickenlooper showed all of us that negative campaigning isn’t what Denver wants or needs. We don’t do things like that here.
Help Michael stand against these deceptive attacks so that he can keep running an honest, positive and hopeful campaign. Please contribute $25, $50 or $100 today!
Thank you for supporting Michael for Mayor.
Sincerely,
Colorado State Senator Joyce Foster
Denver Councilwoman-at-Large Carol Boigon
State Board of Education Member Elaine Berman
Denver Public Schools Board Member Theresa Pena
Denver Public Schools Board Member Mary Seawell
Hon. Elbra Wedgeworth
Katina Banks
Adrienne Benavidez
Hannah Boigon
Ajenai “AJ” Clemmons
Abby Davidson
Nikki Floyd
Mary Louise Lee-Hancock
C.L. Harmer
Melody Harris
Anna Jo Haynes
Khadija Haynes
Victoria Haynes
Susan Heinzeroth
Leslie Herod
Fabby Hillyard
Christie Isenberg
Monica Lang
Courtney Law
Erin Mewhinney
Sarah Moss
Kendra Sandoval
Sonja Semion
Skye Stuart
You must be logged in to post a comment.
BY: Air Slash
IN: Apparently Everyone Is Wrong Except For Gabe Evans
BY: Air Slash
IN: Friday Open Thread
BY: 2Jung2Die
IN: Friday Open Thread
BY: JohnNorthofDenver
IN: Friday Open Thread
BY: JohnNorthofDenver
IN: Friday Open Thread
BY: Marla Robbinson
IN: Apparently Everyone Is Wrong Except For Gabe Evans
BY: Ben Folds5
IN: Friday Open Thread
BY: MichaelBowman
IN: Friday Open Thread
BY: unnamed
IN: Friday Open Thread
BY: Powerful Pear
IN: Friday Open Thread
Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!
Asking a candidate to clarify their position on issues as important as choice and woman’s health is totally warranted – especially when that candidate has just dismissed the issues as unimportant and irrelevant.
As the Romer camp pointed out, the mayor HAS control over a host of issues that are directly related to choice and woman’s health — a very important issue that Michael was hesitant to comment on.
Furthermore, we all know the Mayor of Denver influences issues and policies to which he has NO direct control. It’s why both Michael and Chris advocated so strongly for school reform – and why I supported neither.
When Michael berated James on the radio over his legitimate criticisms of the Far North East turnaround plan was that dirty campaigning, mudslinging? Ya’ll recall the mayor has NO direct control over the school system, and still Michael used his positions on reform as a wedge. What’s the difference between school reform and choice (other than the fact that the Mayor actually has some real power over choice)?
The Hancock campaign knows their candidate screwed-up, and misspoke – he should never have dismissed such an important issue. Unfortunately for them it’s one where their candidate has little track record, and so their only response is to call Chris Romer a liar.
Personally I am just amused by how both candidates do such an inept job of feigning outrage. “We’re outraged, just outraged!” “We’re outraged that you’re saying you’re outraged!” It is like watching The McLaughlin Group shout at each other in slow motion.
“Outrage!”
And I did not use the word “mudslinging”. I was merely noting that the expect turn towards the negative had occurred as sure as the spring snow melt. I would have been surprised had it not occurred no matter who made the run off. Hancock will stress Romer being a banker and Romer will shout “council pay raise” right back.
Personally I cannot get worked up about any of it since I do not like either of them. I am going to enjoy the show and vote for the one I dislike less.