(D) J. Hickenlooper*
(D) Julie Gonzales
(R) Mark Baisley
80%
20%↓
10%
(D) Jena Griswold
(D) M. Dougherty
(D) Hetal Doshi
40%
30%↑
30%
(D) Jeff Bridges
(R) Kevin Grantham
80%↑
20%↓
(D) Diana DeGette*
(D) Milat Kiros
(D) Wanda James
60%↓
30%↑
10%↓
(D) Joe Neguse*
(R) Somebody
90%
2%
(R) Jeff Hurd*
(D) Dwayne Romero(D) Alex Kelloff
50%↓
35%↑
30%↓
(R) Lauren Boebert*
(D) E. Laubacher
80%
20%
(R) Jeff Crank*
(D) Jessica Killin
53%↓
48%↑
(D) Jason Crow*
(R) Mel Tewahade
90%
2%
(D) B. Pettersen*
(R) A. Capobianco
90%
2%
(R) Gabe Evans*
(D) Shannon Bird
(D) Manny Rutinel
45%↓
30%↑
30%↓
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
80%
20%
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
95%
5%
Although we’ve heard of some searing criticisms levied against GOP HD-22 candidate Justin Everett by members of his own party, his primary victory over Loren Bauman is all but assured by virtue of Everett’s sizable fundraising lead.
Everett raised $6,500 in the most recent fundraising period, compared to just $600 for Bauman. While the 10-1 disparity is striking, the difference in campaign spending is even more drastic. Everett’s spent just about $9,000 on the campaign; Bauman, only $1,800.
It takes money to connect with voters, and Everett’s spent enough to guarantee his victory. Despite all of his opponent’s flaws as a candidate, Bauman simply has not raised enough money to make the point that he’s a better fit. Even if Bauman’s knocked on every Republican voter’s door three times this cycle, Everett’s expenditures on robocalls and campaign literature ensure that he has connected with more voters more often.
Bottom line: Money isn’t everything in political campaigns, but if you don’t have enough money to make yourself visible, the odds won’t be in your favor.
Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!
Comments