U.S. Senate See Full Big Line

(D) J. Hickenlooper*

(R) Somebody

80%

20%

(D) Joe Neguse

(D) Phil Weiser

(D) Jena Griswold

60%

60%

40%↓

Att. General See Full Big Line

(D) M. Dougherty

(D) Alexis King

(D) Brian Mason

40%

40%

30%

Sec. of State See Full Big Line

(D) George Stern

(D) A. Gonzalez

(R) Sheri Davis

40%

40%

30%

State Treasurer See Full Big Line

(D) Brianna Titone

(R) Kevin Grantham

(D) Jerry DiTullio

60%

30%

20%

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Hurd*

(D) Somebody

80%

40%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert*

(D) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Crank*

(D) Somebody

80%

20%

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) B. Pettersen*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(R) Gabe Evans*

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(D) Joe Salazar

50%

40%

40%

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
November 19, 2024 12:01 PM UTC

Meet Your New Energy Secretary, Colorado Petro-Evangelist Chris Wright

  • 8 Comments
  • by: Colorado Pols

UPDATE: 9NEWS’ Kyle Clark profiles Chris Wright’s “fracking evangelist” views such as the “fearmongering” of linking climate change to extreme weather events, the warm fuzzy upside of global warming, the non-existence of a climate “crisis” of any kind, and other boardroom bromides you’ll be excited to hear from the next Secretary of Energy:

—–

Petro-evangelical fracking CEO Chris Wright.

Among the increasingly scandalous clown car of nominees announced by incoming President re-elect Donald Trump is one among them being hailed, at least by his local boosters, as a “pragmatic problem solver” pick with bipartisan support–assuming the Senate even gets to vote on Trump’s nominees, which as of this writing is not guaranteed. But the choice of Denver-based fracking executive Chris Wright to lead the Department of Energy, for those who have followed his record as the director of the politically hyperactive drilling company Liberty Energy, will set the nation on a course to curtail ongoing attempts to mitigate climate change in favor of what we can only describe as a religious devotion to fossil fuels. AP’s Matthew Daly:

Fossil fuel executive Chris Wright, Donald Trump’s choice for Energy secretary, is a strong supporter of oil and gas development, including fracking, a key pillar of the president-elect’s quest for U.S. “energy dominance” in the global market.

Wright has been one of the industry’s loudest voices against efforts to fight climate change, and he could give fossil fuels a boost, including quick action to end a year-long pause on natural gas export approvals by the Biden administration.

CEO of Denver-based Liberty Energy, he describes himself as “a tech nerd turned entrepreneur” and promotes the idea that more fossil fuel production can lift people out of poverty around the globe.

So, we’re not just talking about any oil and gas executive. As the founder of Pinnacle Technologies, since acquired by energy giant Halliburton, Wright helped launch the fracking “revolution” that greatly expanded access to oil and natural gas resources at the expense of scarring the American West with toxic drilling sites. Nobody in MAGA world would dare admit it, but the United States reached record levels of oil production under President Joe Biden with fracking playing a major role in the increase. The difference between the two is that while the Biden administration acknowledged the need to transition away from fossil fuels to address climate change, Wright wants to increase dependence on fossil fuels and abandon the transition to renewables altogether. Wright simply denies the existence of either:

“There is no climate crisis, and we’re not in the midst of an energy transition either,” Wright said. [Pols emphasis]

Chris Wright presents North Face with a mock award.

Locals may recall a public relations campaign waged by Wright’s Liberty Energy in 2021 against the outdoor clothing manufacturer North Face after the company declined to embroider an oil and gas company’s logo on an order of jackets. While it’s true that most outdoor wear these days is made from plastic, if all we did with fossil fuels was make durable goods from them…well, we’d still have a problem, but it would be a very different kind of problem than the problem created by burning fossil fuels.

Wright’s wholesale denial of the increasingly urgent climate crisis comes as a shock to any voter who prioritized the issue of climate change in the last election. But along with a host of other important issues thrown out with the proverbial bathwater, a majority of voters simply didn’t prioritize climate change when they voted for Donald Trump. We can anticipate the result, a swift rollback of regulations and a brief sugar high for the economy, with the continuing and accelerating effects of climate change left to not-too-future administrations to address. For the next four years, even though there has been little to no restraint on the growth of energy production under the current administration, “drill baby drill” will be not just a slogan, but a religious creed. The 180-degree policy about-face this represents, and the potential long-term consequences, cannot be overstated.

The patron saint of fracking will call the shots on American energy now–and for that to be one of Trump’s less controversial picks is truly remarkable.

Comments

8 thoughts on “Meet Your New Energy Secretary, Colorado Petro-Evangelist Chris Wright

    1. I went to HS with him.  He's very smart, and went to MIT undergrad if I recall.  But he's a full-on greedy, bombastic SOB.  I suspect he understands climate science, he just makes more money by lying about it.  

  1. The unsaid portion is that restarting the expansion on LNG exports will raise the price of NG in the United States as market particpants seek higher prices for their product. Which will raise the fuel cost adder for electric bills and for heating bills.

    Goodbye Henry Hub benchmark, hello JKM. 

     

    1. The U.S. Dollar is being battered. Oil and gas have been traded in USD for as long as I have been alive, at least. Lately, however, Elon ( I’m gonna take over someday) Musk is angling to replace the gold standard with a bitcoin standard…I think.

      I do not pretend to understand the nuances of the world economy and the implications of monetary policy. 

      Does oil and gas on the JKM trade on USD? China and Taiwan are huge buyers.

  2. Key element here — the Department of Energy has next to nothing to do with petroleum or coal.

    The Department of Energy (DOE) is responsible for advancing the energy, environmental, and nuclear security of the United States; promoting scientific and technological innovation in support of that mission; sponsoring basic research in the physical sciences; and ensuring the environmental cleanup of the nation’s nuclear weapons complex.

    Or another take:

    The DOE was created in 1977 in the aftermath of the 1973 oil crisis. It sponsors more physical science research than any other U.S. federal agency, the majority of which is conducted through its system of National Laboratories.[3][4] The DOE also directs research in genomics, with the Human Genome Project originating from a DOE initiative.[5]

    Permitting wells?  Nope, that's done elsewhere, mainly by states.  Transporting oil via pipelines or other energy transport?  Nope,

    The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, or FERC, is an independent agency that regulates the interstate transmission of electricity, natural gas, and oil. FERC also reviews proposals to build liquefied natural gas (LNG) terminals and interstate natural gas pipelines as well as licensing hydropower projects.

     

  3. If this guy really wanted to promote oil and gas exploration and extraction, he would have asked for the Interior slot. DoE has very little to do with whether and how paritcular energy sources are used in this country. 

  4. Always worth taking a peak at Project 2025 to see what the goals may be (and in this case how they would pertain to oil and gas exploration and extraction):

    Eliminate special-interest funding programs. Many DOE energy funding programs are not targeted on fundamental science and technology; instead, they focus more on commercialization and act as subsidies to the Department of Energy and Related Commissions private sector for government-favored resources. The DOE Office of Clean Energy Demonstrations (OCED); Office of State and Community Energy Programs; ARPA-E; Office of Grid Deployment (OGD); and DOE Loan Program should be eliminated or reformed. If they continue to exist, FECM, NE, OE, and EERE should focus on fundamental science and technology issues, particularly in relation to cyber and physical threats to energy security, rather than subsidizing and commercializing energy resources.

    Eliminate political and climate-change interference in DOE approvals of liquefied natural gas (LNG) exports. In addition, Congress should reform the Natural Gas Act to expand required approvals from merely nations with free trade agreements to all of our allies, such as NATO countries.

    Focus the Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP) on ensuring that government buildings and operations have reliable and cost effective energy. FEMP should stop using taxpayer dollars to force the purchase of more expensive and less reliable energy resources in the name of combating climate change. 

    Focus FERC on its statutory obligation to ensure access to reliable energy at just, reasonable, and nondiscriminatory rates. FERC is a five-member commission created under the DOE Organization Act that regulates the wholesale sales and transmission of electricity, promotes electric reliability through standards, permits natural gas pipelines and LNG export facilities, sets natural gas pipeline shipping rates, and sets oil pipeline shipping rates. It is an economic regulator and should not make itself a climate regulator.

    Also concerning:

    Fund the design, development, and deployment of new nuclear warheads, including the production of plutonium pits in quantity.

    Expand the U.S. Navy and develop new nuclear naval reactors to ensure that the Navy has the nuclear propulsion it needs to secure America’s strategic interests.

    End ineffective and counterproductive nonproliferation activities like those involving Iran and the United Nations.

    Eliminate FECM. The next Administration should work with Congress to eliminate all of DOE’s applied energy programs, including those in FECM (with the possible exception of those that are related to basic science for new energy technology). Taxpayer dollars should not be used to subsidize preferred businesses and energy resources, thereby distorting the market and undermining energy reliability.

    Ensure that LNG export approvals are reviewed and processed in a timely manner. In particular:

    1. Ensure that LNG export applications are reviewed and approved expeditiously.
    2. Maintain the categorical exclusion from the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) for LNG exports that was established by the Trump Administration or (if it is revoked by the Biden Administration) reinstate it.
    3. Work with Congress to expand automatic approvals to include allies such as NATO as well as nations that have free trade agreements with the U.S.

    End the focus on climate change and green subsidies. 

    Eliminate energy e!ciency standards for appliances. 

    Eliminate EERE. The next Administration should work with Congress to eliminate all of DOE’s applied energy programs, including those in EERE (with the possible exception of those that are related to basic science for new energy technology). Taxpayer dollars should not be used to subsidize preferred businesses and energy resources, thereby distorting the market and undermining energy reliability.

    Reject ratification of the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty and indicate a willingness to conduct nuclear tests in response to adversary nuclear developments if necessary. This will require that NNSA be directed to move to immediate test readiness to give the Administration maximum flexibility in responding to adversary actions.

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

55 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!