How Do Republicans Solve Their Qaucus Problem?

Rep. Lauren Boebert and Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene

Here’s a Qonundrum for you: Would you rather be represented in Congress by Colorado Republican Rep. Lauren “Q*Bert” Boebert or Georgia Republican Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene?

Your answer might depend on when the question is being asked. Boebert and Greene are the leaders of the Republican Qaucus in the House of Representatives, united in their shared belief in QAnon conspiracy theories, inane boilerplate rants, and a “flexible” commitment to law and order in general. On any given day, one of them is making headlines for all the wrong reasons. Q*Bert had been sucking up much of the helium in the room lately, but Greene (MTG) is elbowing her way in front this week.

According to CNN’s KFile, MTG has expressed support on multiple occasions for executing prominent Democratic leaders:

In one post, from January 2019, Greene liked a comment that said “a bullet to the head would be quicker” to remove House Speaker Nancy Pelosi. In other posts, Greene liked comments about executing FBI agents who, in her eyes, were part of the “deep state” working against Trump.

In one Facebook post from April 2018, Greene wrote conspiratorially about the Iran Deal, one of former President Barack Obama’s signature foreign policy achievements. A commenter asked Greene, “Now do we get to hang them ?? Meaning H & O ???,” referring to Obama and Hillary Clinton.

Greene replied, “Stage is being set. Players are being put in place. We must be patient. This must be done perfectly or liberal judges would let them off.”

Yep. An actual Member of Congress has repeatedly suggested that the best way to deal with Democratic politicians is to just kill them. In her defense, an MTG spokesperson says that these comments were made before she was elected to Congress, which somehow makes them…not as terrible? As Aaron Blake responds in The Washington Post:

She is a 46-year-old woman essentially arguing that comments she made when she was 44 don’t reflect upon her today or aren’t relevant. Has she really evolved that much in two years?

These revelations about MTG come at the same time that a debate continues about whether or not Boebert provided help to groups or individuals who took part in the terrorist attack on the U.S. Capitol on January 6. At the very least, it is indisputable that Boebert regularly pals around with known anti-government militia types.

Boebert and MTG didn’t get elected because of their beliefs in crazy conspiracy theories, but you also can’t say that their ascension to political office was in spite of these opinions. Republicans knew exactly what to expect of Boebert and MTG; House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy responded to questions about both women in November by saying, “our party is very diverse.”

According to Axios, McCarthy is planning to have a conversation with MTG, which is probably not going to accomplish much of anything. As Chris Cillizza writes for CNN, Boebert and MTG aren’t going to stop being a problem for the GOP anytime soon:

No matter how much McCarthy attempts to re-cast Greene as simply an outspoken conservative, it’s ever more clear that this is someone who represents a radical and extreme set of views that should have no business being associated with either of the two major political parties.

Which isn’t to say that Greene should be removed from Congress. While her views are noxious, they were plenty well-known by the voters of Georgia’s 14th district when they chose her as the Republican nominee.

But that doesn’t mean that the Republican Party should actively welcome Greene in their conference by providing her with committee assignments and the other benefits of being affiliated with the Republican Party. Because in so doing, they are condoning these sorts of views as somehow part of the broad spectrum of thought within the GOP.

And that is a very dangerous thing to do — if McCarthy and the rest of Republican leadership wants to have an actual national party going forward. Because a party that allows views like Greene’s to have a seat at the table isn’t one that should be taken seriously. [Pols emphasis]

Yeah, not so much.

The warning lights have been flashing here for a long time. Even well-worn right wing megaphones such as The New York Post have tried to leave Boebert on the side of the highway; she is already so toxic that other Republican leaders are being forced to defend themselves merely for appearing next to her in a photo. And, like MTG, Boebert’s QAnon beliefs are irrefutable; there’s no way to spin her own documented words in any other direction.

Boebert and MTG are a package deal in that it’s difficult to see how Republicans could get rid of one and not the other. As long as both of them are in Congress together, there will be no escaping the endless QAnon stories or the chance that any given day one of them will drag the other into the news.

And the longer this continues, the worse it will get for the GOP. Here in Colorado, Boebert is rapidly becoming the face of the Republican Party. Boebert recently endorsed Kristi Burton Brown to become the next Chair of the State Republican Party instead of longtime Republican insider Scott Gessler.

Republicans can have “leadership” or they can have “frazzledrip,” but they can’t have both.

0 Shares

16 Community Comments, Facebook Comments

  1. Diogenesdemar says:

    Keeeristey on a cr?cker !!! . . .

    . . . ain’t it f*¥•in’ bad enough already that I’ve got to imagine my Representative named Buck ???!!!

  2. High Valley Lurker says:

    A good politician can always spin anything or move away from a previous position. For Reference, see Al Gore.

    That said, at this point there is zero evidence that Boebert is a good politician. Good rabble-rouser on social media, yeah, that I’ll grant her from what others say. But that does not imply any real political skills.

  3. MichaelBowman says:

    McCarthy has a plethora of challenges (maybe buy kneepads by the case – this might take a while)

    McCarthy claws his way back to Trump’s good side

    Fortune 500 companies are halting contributions

    Oh, and that Liz Cheney thing. 

  4. High Valley Lurker says:

    A democracy can not survive if it accepts people who would not accept the results of an election.

    Democracy is an agreement on a way of settling a fight without guns and missiles. The sides instead agree to count votes. But, fundamental and foundational to this agreement known as democracy is that all sides will accept the results of the election.

    You can not have a political group within a democracy that will not accept the results of the elections. The democracy may temporarily remain standing in such a state, but it is doomed and will soon perish from the Earth.

    At this point, I have heard very few members of the QOP clearly state that they will accept the results of future elections, while almost all Republicans just voted to say that Trump did nothing wrong in trying to overturn the results of the last election and thus overthrow the legitimate government of this country.

  5. MattC says:

    The picture says it all.

    The only question left to answer is who is top of ticket?

  6. ajb says:

    This isn't a new problem, they just diversified the gender. Gym Jordan, Matt Gaetz, Louie Louie Gohmert in the House and Hawley and Cruz trying to see who can dive deeper down the rabbit hole. Right wing nuttery is no longer just a boys club.

  7. DawnPatrol says:

    Yosemite Scam's makin' Western CO look more ignorant, asinine, gullible and foolish by the minute.

    Gosh, if only they'd had another choice…

    • Duke Cox says:

      While it is true that Calamity Jane is taking huckstering to a new level (these Good Ol' Boys 'around here like what she is selling), we have had a long succession of do nothing representatives. Western Colorado has been represented in DC by a long succession of Oil and Gas lobbyists and their paid (campaign contributions being what they are) legislative mouthpieces.

      The big misunderstanding  (lie?) is the people the Republicans elect here aren't supposed to represent you and me….unless you are…well, you know.

  8. KirkDogg says:

    It's gotten to the already and quickly with Q-bert that I'm not sure I want to tell people I'm from Steamboat Springs for the sheer embarrassment of knowing that people will know she "represents" me in the federal government.

Leave a Reply

Comment from your Facebook account


You may comment with your Colorado Pols account above (click here to register), or via Facebook below.