Oops! Lauren Boebert Discovers The Law A Day Late

UPDATE: Salon’s Roger Sollenberger follows up, and Rep. Lauren Boebert is in full-auto backpedal:

Asked Monday morning about the gift, Boebert told Salon in a text message, “Who said I accepted it? You saw a presentation.” She would not say whether she refused, returned or did not accept the gift, replying: “I didn’t leave with it. You’re grasping at air here.”

…In a later text, Boebert cited this loophole: “I do not have possession of the firearm. I may purchase it from the current owner in the future. That has not yet been determined.” Asked who that current owner was, Boebert replied, “I’m not telling you or anyone.” [Pols emphasis]

Not shady at all! No word on the background check the state of Colorado requires for her to take possession of her custom engraved Glock either, but presumably she’ll have to tell the Colorado Bureau of Investigations where she got it–or rather she already should have.

It doesn’t seem like anyone thought this through very well, but the responsibility is, as always, at the top.


Rural Colorado United Tweeted out a video this morning of Rep. Lauren Boebert filmed yesterday that’s stirring up fresh controversy for Colorado’s most controversial congressional freshman ever:

And yes, there are both state and federal legal problems with what Boebert can be seen on camera doing here, accepting a customized Glock pistol from the Bikers for Trump–presumably as thanks for Boebert audaciously challenging gun regulations inside the U.S. Capitol in the days after the January 6th insurrection. It’s against congressional ethics rules for members of Congress to accept gifts valued over $50–a similar provision exists under Colorado’s Amendment 41, but federal officials are exempt. It is further illegal under Colorado law to transfer a firearm to anyone other than a family member without completing a background check with just a few exceptions that do not apply here.

It appears that sometime between yesterday when this illegal firearm transfer and disallowed gift in excess of $50 to a member of Congress took place and this morning, somebody informed Boebert that she had past-tense broken the law:

The problem, of course, is that Boebert had already accepted the gift, the day before she made this announcement under pressure from Rural Colorado United. This probably isn’t the first time such a situation has occurred, and we’ll have to see how the rules are interpreted in this case. But it certainly appears that Boebert took illegal possession of a gun yesterday from a known militia member, then sought to cover her ass today by saying after the fact that she’d pay for it.

And either way, transferring a gun between two people who are not immediate family without a background check for that transaction is illegal in Colorado.

Just like bringing pork sliders up to the minimum required temperature, ignorance of the law is no excuse.

10 Community Comments, Facebook Comments

  1. High Valley Lurker says:

    IIRC … (and that’s a big if since I’m not a lawyer), technically, (and this refers to the tweet author), “illegal” is not synonymous with “against Congressional ethics rules.” “Against congressional ethics rules” gets one referred to a committee. Although, if that Committee includes any of the members who are at risk of dying because some Reps refuse to wear a mask, even in private, then Boebert may not want to be in front of that committee.

    The gun laws are an entirely different matter.

    I do love this bunch of insurrectionists. They video all of their crimes for posterity.

  2. High Valley Lurker says:

    And again, the general incompetence is amazing.

    I don’t expect every new CongressCritter to have memorized every ethics rule. But having someone on your staff who has memorized every rule, and hopefully been working in that field on Capitol Hill for a decade or so, well, that just seems to be Elementary my dear Watson.

    I’m surprised the Republican leadership doesn’t just assign such a staff member to every incoming, newby, freshman as a precaution. Or, maybe that person has already resigned in frustration?

    • JohnInDenver says:

      New members of Congress get an orientation which includes reminders about ethics, and I think hand out a manual (or at least refers to a website) where the rules can be read. 

      EVERY corporate ethics training I've attended (thankfully, I don't think I'll need to do it again) also includes an instruction something like: 


      Just guessing, but Boebert knows what's Constitutional, so she's not worried about the rest.

      • harrydoby says:

        Any competent public defender would offer as her defense of being mentally incompetent to stand trial.  Easy peasy. Isn’t that what CD3 looks for in their representative? Tipton was evidence of that years ago. They just decided that two boobs were better than one.

  3. kickshot says:

    Wouldn't it be the responsibility of the County Sheriff to make an arrest for the illegal gun transfer crime? 

    Might he have been in the audience?

  4. MichaelBowman says:

    #PewPew made today's This Modern World 

  5. GJbum says:

    Steve Moore is a convicted felon.  How is he able to buy and gift guns.

  6. MattC says:

    Big deal.

    It's a gun. So? It's not like she tried to got through airport security with it. Or had it under her seat while she drove around capitol hill tipsy.


  7. Diogenesdemar says:

    Calamity Q-bie:  cheekily proving the point . . .

    . . . that whenever guns are outlawed, outlaws will have guns??

    (Just like those GOPers who prove voting fraud exists by committing voting fraud . . .)

    “Told ya’ so, libs! Come and try to take it, Beto! Pew-pew-pew!!!”

Leave a Reply

Comment from your Facebook account

You may comment with your Colorado Pols account above (click here to register), or via Facebook below.