CO-04 (Special Election) See Full Big Line

(R) Greg Lopez

(R) Trisha Calvarese

90%

10%

President (To Win Colorado) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Biden*

(R) Donald Trump

80%

20%↓

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

90%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

90%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(D) Adam Frisch

(R) Jeff Hurd

(R) Ron Hanks

40%

30%

20%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert

(R) Deborah Flora

(R) J. Sonnenberg

30%↑

15%↑

10%↓

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Dave Williams

(R) Jeff Crank

50%↓

50%↑

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

90%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) Brittany Pettersen

85%↑

 

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(R) Gabe Evans

(R) Janak Joshi

60%↑

35%↓

30%↑

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
July 29, 2010 08:04 AM UTC

Colorado Rules Cause Drilling Slowdown (and spills and thrills)

  • 8 Comments
  • by: ardy39

( – promoted by Colorado Pols)

Well, do you have a better explanation for this?

“EnCana has chosen to take a wait and see approach,” said Doug Hock, director of community and public relations for EnCana. “We remain active in the state and plan to drill an exploratory well on our state leased acreage in the near future. Until the results of this can be evaluated, however, we’ve made a decision to forgo further leasing of private land.”

So, what do you tree-hugging-American-job-hating-libruls have to say in your defense now?

And if that wasn’t enough, perhaps this next will convince you …

“At this point, we’re just stopping any efforts from going forward to acquire more private minerals,” Hock said. “We have a large acreage position on state land and we are still interested in pursing assets in Michigan.”

See! So there! Now all you naysayers are just going to have to admit it. Ritter’s Rules are responsible for the slowdown in activity in …  Where? … Michigan? … Really? … Oh, never mind.

“Taking a step back is just a business decision,” [said Hock.]

Wait a minute. Slowing down is “just a business decision” in Michigan, but a slowdown in Colorado is because of the most onerous rules ever even considered by modern man? Come on EnCana, which is it?

Well, if you’re interested in the rest of the story about this Ritter-induced tragedy in Michigan (and Petoskey Exploration LLC, a Colorado based company and branch of EnCana) you can find the story here.

(In case you are wondering, Michigan has exactly zero rigs actively drilling in the state (as of July 23, according to Baker-Hughes). This is a decline of 100% from a high of 2 in 2008. In contrast, the active rig count in Colorado has increased by 13% since the new rules became effective and increased 42% since the low point was reached in October 2009.)

======================================================================

.

Or, if you prefer your bad news closer to home, you can read here about the sleuthing COGCC staff did to identify Williams as the source for the poisoning of Ned Prather’s water well. I recommend reading this “AOC” – these people (COGCC staff) are working for you and me. They’ve earned my respect and admiration with this fine piece of detective work.

.

======================================================================

Elsewhere in Michigan, and totally unrelated to oil and gas activity, of course, are reports of

The largest oil leak ever in the state of Michigan



Oil flows over Ceresco dam (Photo by Todd Heywood)

Here are a few highlights from this story:

Patrick Daniels, president and CEO of Enbridge, says 19,000 barrels, or about 789,000 gallons, of oil was released.

[EPA] estimates just under one million gallons of crude oil was sent spewing into Talmadge Creek and then into the Kalamazoo River.

… the oil slick has reached 16 miles down the river…

A lingering question remains about the timing of the leak due to conflicts between statements made by the company and local officials.

… 9:30 a.m. CST (10:30 a.m. Michigan time) on Monday …

… knew about the release at 9:25 p.m. on Sunday night …

… alerted to the incident at 12:30 a.m. July 26, a full 8 hours before …

… not the first time …

Dead fish are washing up on the shore of the creek and geese are found scattered throughout the area covered in oil.

It’s almost starting to seem commonplace, isn’t it?

Ho hum, just another spill.

Are these three pieces of additional evidence that there is something systemically wrong?

.

[This diary was completed without using any quotes from or making any links to the Denver Past.]

Comments

8 thoughts on “Colorado Rules Cause Drilling Slowdown (and spills and thrills)

    1. that’s because you said it all so well.

      Seriously, ardy, great diary.

      It never ceases to amaze me how these people can continue to push claims that have been “refudiated” SO MANY TIMES!

      But I guess, when all you have are lies, that’s what you go with.

    2. dukeco says it well.

      You wrote it well.

      I drive my car, and ride in trains and planes all of which need liquid fuel.

      I heat my house and water with gas.

      I can’t afford not to and don’t want to go without.

      So- the extraction and production process should bear it’s cost.  And informed people like you need to keep pointing out to the rest of us when it doesn’t.

  1. listening to lots of conspiracy theorists talking about what our President has in store for us, what his next plans are, I return to find nothing really different.

  2. and I thank the COGC for carrying out their responsibility.

    Is Encana’s (and others) reluctance to drill on private land because it costs more? Would that not represent the true cost? Shouldn’t the state and feds be paid what it would cost if it were private land? If we really need these resources that badly it ought to be worth the cost.

    1. that without the freedom to crap on people at will, as they were allowed to do under the previous rules, they are now finding a higher level of accountability.

      Split Estate landowners have always gotten short shrift from the industry. They have never had any real bargaining power so the bulldozers seldom paid them heed.

      HB1252 affected that situation, but I am not the one to try to explain it. My work with the GVCA was almost exclusively on split estate issues until the year we passed the bills. I concentrated on HB1341 that year, so my knowledge of what real effect has been spurred by HB1252, I couldn’t really say.

      Twitty, ardy, …?

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

123 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!