U.S. Senate
See Full Big Line
(D) J. Hickenlooper*
(R) Somebody
80%
20%
Governor
See Full Big Line
(D) Phil Weiser
(D) Joe Neguse
(D) Michael Bennet
50%
50%
50%
Att. General
See Full Big Line
(D) M. Dougherty
(D) Jena Griswold
(D) Brian Mason
60%↑
30%↑
20%↓
Sec. of State
See Full Big Line
(D) A. Gonzalez
(D) George Stern
(R) Sheri Davis
50%↑
40%
30%
State Treasurer
See Full Big Line
(D) Brianna Titone
(R) Kevin Grantham
(D) Jerry DiTullio
60%↑
30%
20%↓
CO-01 (Denver)
See Full Big Line
(D) Diana DeGette*
(R) Somebody
90%
2%
CO-02 (Boulder-ish)
See Full Big Line
(D) Joe Neguse*
(R) Somebody
90%
2%
CO-03 (West & Southern CO)
See Full Big Line
(R) Jeff Hurd*
(D) Somebody
80%
40%
CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado)
See Full Big Line
(R) Lauren Boebert*
(D) Somebody
90%
10%
CO-05 (Colorado Springs)
See Full Big Line
(R) Jeff Crank*
(D) Somebody
80%
20%
CO-06 (Aurora)
See Full Big Line
(D) Jason Crow*
(R) Somebody
90%
10%
CO-07 (Jefferson County)
See Full Big Line
(D) B. Pettersen*
(R) Somebody
90%
10%
CO-08 (Northern Colo.)
See Full Big Line
(R) Gabe Evans*
(D) Manny Rutinel
(D) Yadira Caraveo
45%↓
40%↑
30%
State Senate Majority
See Full Big Line
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
80%
20%
State House Majority
See Full Big Line
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
95%
5%
July 01, 2010 07:08 PM UTC
17 Comments
Hard-hitting stuff, Brad.
Buck and Norton might as well just drop out, now that they’re being “held accountable”.
Local Democrat Party attacks Republican Candidates….
Film at 11
but I love the idea. Nice job CDP!
Glad to see the Repugnant Repubs getting a taste of their own words. Norton has been attacking Bennet and Obama for months now. I know Bennet is trying to stay above it all but damnit I wish he’d start hitting Norton and especially Buck who has been getting a free ride. Why is it up to the state party to have to go after the Repubs??!! I mean I’m glad they’re doing it but I wish Bennet would stop just talking about fixing Washington and swing back at the Repub attacks. The Dem nomination is his so why not just go into full campaign mode against the Repubs?!
Anyway thanks for sharing the website. Hope it keeps some great stuff coming and that you all don’t forget all of us up here in the mountains! BTW Mr. Bennet come back up to Summit!
they support offshore drilling (oh wait…Bennet does too). They would vote to help BP (oh wait…Bennet does too).
It’s best coming from the party, given that Bennet doesn’t have much room to talk — not much daylight between him and Norton
Who are you? And how much are they paying you to spend all day attacking Bennet on the internet?
and realized how ironic it is…
Who am I? A cranky old liberal tired of seeing Corporatists like Bennet destroy what’s left of the progressive movement in the democratic party.
How much are “they” paying me to spend all day attacking Bennet on the internet? “They” aren’t (whoever “they” is). I’m not a paid blogger; I’ve said it before, but I want to make the point clear. If you must know, I have a really boring job and this helps pass the day.
to the progressive movement the 8 years that the DLC was in charge of the Democratic party. Romanoff was proud to proclaim his DLC leadership connections until this year as he tries to portray himself as a progressive ( perhaps he is hoping for an oscar ).
Howard Dean restored progressiveism to the Deocrats and it is a shame he is still not DNC chair.
It goes off message. Well off his message. He has no explanation other than Romanoff underwent some sort of metamorphosis and became a progressive right before he criticized Bennet for not being a progressive. Just like he saw the light about PACs and disbanded his right before he attacked Bennet for taking PAC money. A pattern emerges…
Romanoff’s campaign strategy seems to consist of throwing as much shit at Bennet as possible. The main idea behind this being people will be too distracted by flying shit to pay attention to Romanoff’s record with an added bonus if by chance some shit sticks to Bennet.
Stryker carries that over onto this site. He never actually responds to questions about Romanoff’s record, instead he’ll do anything possible to change the subject.
In Adult Medical cases this caused people to be thown off of Medicaid who had cancer because they participated in society and worked so that their SSDI exceeded the SSI limit by a few dollars.
If they had never worked then they would have a few dollars less, but full medical.
I know this because I worked in Adult Medical and had to explain to people why they were losing their benefits at hearings.
That was a main plank of the DLC (i.e. Clinton organization) paltform which carried Pres.Clinton to re election.
Many people died because of that bill.
So please save us the bluster of how progressive the DLC was or is.
Actually to answer conductrix frequent question too, of where was I in 2006—-I was living with undocumented workers.
First, Why do you deliberately ignore the facts when attacking Bennet, pretending he is some sort of evil guy. I remember that hyperbolic comment you made awhile back, and you should be ashamed of yourself.
Second, Bennet’s explanation for those votes has been really clear. Not everything is as simple as a soundbite:
http://www.kdvr.com/news/polit…
And Bennet has been pretty outspoken and aggressive about holding BP accountable, far moreso than Andrew, actually. Probably because Andrew is too busy attacking another Democrat unfairly. Respected him for years, but I’m done with him. Maybe he’ll run a primary against Udall in 2014, since Udall’s votes on behalf of Colorado are so evil and all?
who I’m voting for. I came into the primary without all the baggage surrounding the appointment from CA. I absolutely admire Bennet for sticking to talking about HIS votes and HIS ideas and not attacking Romanoff about every single tiny detail. Lord knows Romanoff has given him reason enough.
I do wish that Bennet would go more aggressive towards the Republicans but wonder if he can’t. I wouldn’t put it past Romanoff to wait until Bennet is distracted with Buck/Norton to blind side him. Would you?
what’s your point? He voted against people and for corporations. It’s that simple.
Is the fact that 61 senators voted against something enough to make it right? No — it means there were 61 bad votes. That simple.
to be posting campaign ads without paying Pols for it?
he’s not.
Love the idea, but poorly delivererd.