U.S. Senate See Full Big Line

(D) J. Hickenlooper*

(D) Julie Gonzales

(R) Mark Baisley

80%

20%

10%

(D) Michael Bennet

(D) Phil Weiser

(R) Victor Marx
50%↓

50%↑

20%
Att. General See Full Big Line

(D) Jena Griswold

(D) M. Dougherty

(D) Hetal Doshi

40%↓

30%

30%

Sec. of State See Full Big Line
(D) J. Danielson (D) A. Gonzalez (R) James Wiley
50%↓

30%↑

10%
State Treasurer See Full Big Line

(D) Jeff Bridges

(R) Kevin Grantham

80%↑

20%↓

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

(D) Milat Kiros

(D) Wanda James

70%↓

20%↑

10%↓

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Hurd*

(D) Alex Kelloff

(D) Dwayne Romero

(R) Ron Hanks

60%↓

30%↓

30%↑

30%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert*

(D) E. Laubacher

80%

20%

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Crank*

(D) Jessica Killin

53%↓

48%↑

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) B. Pettersen*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(R) Gabe Evans*

(D) Shannon Bird

(D) Manny Rutinel

45%↓

30%

30%

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

[wpdreams_ajaxsearchlite]
April 14, 2026 10:51 AM UTC

Transparency for Me? Senate GOP Moves Caucus Meeting to Independence Institute

  •  
  • by: Colorado Pols

UPDATE: From the “You can’t make this up” department, we were reminded that the Independent Institute is one of the main drivers of a 2026 ballot measure designed to…increase transparency in government.

—–
After much nonsense and time-wasting from House Republicans, the lower chamber in the state legislature is finished with its part of the annual budget process (also known as the “Long Bill”). The debate now moves to the State Senate, where the discussion begins with caucus meetings from each respective political party.

The legislature is constitutionally-mandated to balance the state budget every year; the budget has been a bigger issue than normal this year because a variety of causes have coalesced to force the need to make cut an astounding $1.5 BILLION in cuts. Caucus meetings, which serve as the first chance for each party caucus to sit down together and discuss the budget, are meant to be public gatherings for those who have an interest in this particular sort of political masochism. The meetings are conducted at the State Capitol and the discussion is live-streamed in the interest of transparency.

Well, for Democrats, anyway.

The Senate Majority caucus is meeting today in the Old Supreme Court chambers at the State Capitol, where the back-and-forth will be streamed online in the same manner as any other legislative committee meeting. Senate Republicans, meanwhile, are holding their caucus meeting outside of the Capitol at the offices of the Independence Institute.

The Independence Institute is a conservative “think tank” that has long partnered with elected Republicans on a variety of issues, but the bigger point here is that the Senate GOP is holding what is supposed to be a transparent public meeting at an off-site location where the live-streaming system used at the State Capitol is not available.

Very transparent Assistant Minority Leader Lisa Frizell (R-Castle Rock)

This is unusual, to say the least. You can see from a list of public meetings that this is the first time in recent history Senate Republicans have moved a caucus meeting outside of the State Capitol. Moving this meeting to a private location also makes a mockery of the transparency demands that Senate Republicans make elsewhere.

This is the very first sentence of an Op-Ed from Assistant Minority Leader Lisa Frizell (R-Castle Rock) published on February 27 by the publication formerly known as the Colorado Statesman:

Coloradans have a right to expect transparency, accountability and fiscal responsibility from public institutions.

The point of Frizell’s OpEd was to complain about a single-payer health care study that she insists is being produced in an opaque process. Here’s how she concludes her Op-Ed:

Transparency builds trust. Secrecy erodes it.

Coloradans deserve straight answers. They deserve transparency. And they deserve a legislature focused on real solutions, not relitigating costly and unpopular proposals.

Coloradans have a right to transparency! Just…not from Senate Republicans, apparently.

Comments

Recent Comments


Posts about Donald Trump

Posts about Rep. Gabe Evans

Posts about Rep. Lauren Boebert

Posts about the Colorado House

Posts about the Colorado Senate


71 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!