Colorado Pols
U.S. Senate See Full Big Line

(D) J. Hickenlooper*

(R) Mark Baisley

90%↑

10%

(D) Phil Weiser

(R) Victor Marx

(R) Barb Kirkmeyer
90%↑

20%

15%
Att. General See Full Big Line

(D) Jena Griswold

(R) Michael Allen

70%

30%

Sec. of State See Full Big Line
(D) A. Gonzalez

(R) James Wiley
90%

10%
State Treasurer See Full Big Line

(D) Jeff Bridges

(R) Kevin Grantham

80%↑

20%↓

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Melat Kiros

(R) Christy Peterson

95%

2%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Hurd*

(D) Dwayne Romero

60%↓

40%↑

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert*

(D) E. Laubacher

80%

20%

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Crank*

(D) Jessica Killin

53%↓

48%↑

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

(R) Jason Clark

90%

2%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) B. Pettersen*

(R) A. Capobianco

90%

2%

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(D) Manny Rutinel

(R) Gabe Evans*

55%↑

45%↓

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

[wpdreams_ajaxsearchlite]
May 28, 2009 06:52 PM UTC

Ken Buck's Legal Bills

( – promoted by Colorado Pols)

Last October, Weld County District Attorney (and, dare I say, lackluster, Senate Candidate), Ken Buck, raided Amalia’s Tax Service in Greeley.  He was looking for evidence that undocumented aliens were using other people’s social security numbers to file taxes and receive refunds.

The ACLU filed suit against Buck, as well as Weld County Sheriff, John Cooke, in January.  They successfully argued that Buck’s search warrant violated the 4th Amendment by not detailing, particularly, the persons and items that were being sought.

Today, the Tribune, has revealed that this fight has cost taxpayers almost $100,000.  And this does number does not include attorney’s fees related to the case’s pending Colorado Supreme Court appeal (and the likely appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court).

The whole business around this case has me confused.  A few weeks ago, didn’t the U.S. Supreme Court rule that in order to successfully prosecute ‘identity theft’ against someone using another person’s social security number, the prosecution has to demonstrate that the offender actually knew the number was another person’s.  If he simply makes one up, prints a face SS card, works under the number, he did not steal an identity.

So, the ACLU has successfully had “Operation Numbers Game” halted under the 4th Amendment.  SCOTUS has said that the prosecution will have to prove intent w/re the identity theft charge, even if the ACLU loses on appeal.  What’s Buck doing here?

Is this a taxpayer-funded campaign event?

Comments

Recent Comments


Posts about Donald Trump

Posts about Rep. Gabe Evans

Posts about Rep. Lauren Boebert

Posts about the Colorado House

Posts about the Colorado Senate


43 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!