U.S. Senate See Full Big Line

(D) J. Hickenlooper*

(R) Somebody

80%

20%

(D) Joe Neguse

(D) Phil Weiser

(D) Jena Griswold

60%

60%

40%↓

Att. General See Full Big Line

(D) M. Dougherty

(D) Alexis King

(D) Brian Mason

40%

40%

30%

Sec. of State See Full Big Line

(D) George Stern

(D) A. Gonzalez

(R) Sheri Davis

40%

40%

30%

State Treasurer See Full Big Line

(D) Brianna Titone

(R) Kevin Grantham

(D) Jerry DiTullio

60%

30%

20%

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Hurd*

(D) Somebody

80%

40%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert*

(D) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Crank*

(D) Somebody

80%

20%

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) B. Pettersen*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(R) Gabe Evans*

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(D) Joe Salazar

50%

40%

40%

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
November 20, 2024 08:10 AM UTC

Wednesday Open Thread

  • 16 Comments
  • by: Colorado Pols

“Change your opinions, keep to your principles; change your leaves, keep intact your roots.”

–Victor Hugo

Comments

16 thoughts on “Wednesday Open Thread

      1. He's picking a cabinet whose members will all know very well that they have no business being in their positions, aside from the fact that he appointed them. People like that will do what they are told with not fealty to any person (or country) other than him.

        1. Trump Cabinet 2025: We will rid America of the "Deep State" and we will flourish!
          (Reality): They will fire anyone who doesn't show loyalty to Trump, especially the people who know how to run large, complex organizations.

          Trump Cabinet 2026: Nothing works because the "Deep State" abandoned the American people!! THEY never cared about you!
          (Reality): By prioritizing loyalty over competence, Trump cabinet members basically destroy the organizations they are in charge of.

          Republican Presidential Candidate 2026: The American Government doesn't work! Just look at how shitty it is! I'll make it even smaller!
          (Reality): What our governments, especially our federal government, need are people who actually want to make them work.

          1. I'm not sure I get the "look good on TV" thing – RFK Jr looks as if the worm won; Gaetz likes like an evil but stupid cartoon character; little Marco needs to figure out how to drink a sip of water on TV; Tom Homan, another evil cartoon character; and Noem will look fine if you don't look too close (and if you keep puppies away from her). Can we just say it – besides obvious malevolence, Trump has lost most of his marbles. 

    1. I read recently that about half of American adults read at a 6th grade level or below. The "smarter" ones can read and comprehend something like Charlotte's Web, but that's about it. The decades-old wingnut war on education has well and truly borne fruit. The techbro Gilded Age has lots of docile dullards to serve as slave labor, and will get more and more as PAB 2.0 further neuters the DoE.

  1. It must be very exhausting having to constantly praise and flatter Trump, but I suppose the people he surrounds himself with are very good at it.

    I recall eight years ago when Trump called his Cabinet together and as he went around the table introducing them, they in turn each humiliated themselves puckering up and kissing his ass on national television.

  2. Musk & Ramaswamy are about to learn a giant issue with the federal government. Most of what the government does has powerful supporters.

    The government does not have large projects (outside of Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, & the Military). Instead it has departments that have projects that have initiatives. The money is down in all those myriad initiatives.

    The example I use is too long for a comment but I wrote it up in full at https://liberalandlovingit.substack.com/p/why-musk-will-struggle-to-downsize 

    1. Yep … Musk, who has never had a position in the government and never worked on a government budget, claims he can cut $2 trillion. 

      Knowing some history & process would be instructive, too. Musk, Ramaswamy and the new Whiz Kids they want to hire can PROPOSE spending cuts — but before they actually occur, the House and Senate would need to agree EITHER to reduced appropriations or to a change in existing law about impoundments.

      How likely is that?  BBC pointed out

      • After taking control of the House of Representatives in 2022, Republican lawmakers have struggled to pass legislation to deliver considerably smaller cuts of $130bn in discretionary government spending after meeting opposition from other Republicans.

      • So-called “discretionary” US government spending – outlays that are not permanently enshrined in law but have to be voted on annually by US lawmakers – includes defence ($874bn, 13%), transportation ($137bn, 2%) and education, training, employment and social services ($305bn, 5%). Altogether, discretionary spending accounted for around 25% of the total in the 2023 financial year

      Trump wants to spend more on Defense (no matter how it is spelled).   He wants to spend MASSIVELY on Homeland Security (wall, plus deportation).  As soon as he touches Transportation spending, states and industries will howl.  If he tries to cut Education or training (with the exceptions of loan forgiveness and perhaps graduate student loans), states and industries will howl. Obviously, people who have their salaries cut will add to the clamor, and the increased unemployment will hit state budgets and lower income tax revenues.

      CATO institute, no fan of government, listed a variety of 14 cuts they say would save "about $4.8 trillion over 10 years."  [about 20% of what Musk claims is possible].  One of them

      Stop Medicaid financing gimmick. Most states levy a tax on healthcare providers, which is a financing gimmick to inflate the federal reimbursement for state Medicaid health care costs. Ending the provider tax loophole would save federal taxpayers more than $500 billion over ten years.

      It may save Federal dollars — but it would impact medical spending developed to keep rural hospitals afloat. 

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

54 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!