(Promoted by Colorado Pols)
Originally posted at the Colorado Times Recorder
Last week, state Sen. Mark Baisley (R-Roxborough Park) claimed in a Facebook post that recent images of Vice President Kamala Harris’s campaign rallies were “AI generated.” Baisley posited that these videos violate Colorado’s Candidate Election Deepfake Disclosures Act, and should be reported to Colorado Secretary of State Jenna Griswold.
“All of the phony AI generated images depicting massive crowds for Kamala Harris are in violation of Colorado’s new (and silly) Candidate Election Deepfake Disclosures law,” Baisley wrote online. “Jenna Griswold awaits your call.”
With many other Republican leaders, including Donald Trump, calling Harris’s rally images fake, Baisley’s post is not uncommon — even if it is unfounded. Axios and other fact-checkers reported that these accusations are untrue.
Despite Baisley’s post, the Colorado Secretary of State’s Office stated it has not received any complaints about the Harris campaign violating the Deepfake Disclosures Act, including no complaint from Baisley himself.
When asked about his post, Baisley said that it was just as much a criticism of the Disclosures Act as it was an accusation against the Harris campaign.
“‘Candidate Election Deepfake Disclosures’ was one of two bills this year that, in my opinion, went too far in attempting to limit the use of artificial intelligence technology. As people raise their concerns of suspected AI exaggerations of the Harris political event crowd sizes, it reminded me of HB24-1147,” Baisley wrote in an email to the Colorado Times Recorder. “While the motivation for that bill was to prevent AI from being used to negatively falsify a candidate’s voice or image, the language also seems to include embellishing a candidate’s popularity. As my constituents asked me what can be done, I encouraged them to exercise the Democrats’ new deepfake law. As Abraham Lincoln advised, ‘The best way to get a bad law repealed is to enforce it strictly.’”
Baisley did not comment on the lack of evidence supporting his claim.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
BY: JohnNorthofDenver
IN: Trump/Vance Campaign Following Heidi Ganahl Playbook
BY: Duke Cox
IN: Monday Open Thread
BY: notaskinnycook
IN: Monday Open Thread
BY: Duke Cox
IN: Monday Open Thread
BY: Duke Cox
IN: Monday Open Thread
BY: Duke Cox
IN: Monday Open Thread
BY: JohnInDenver
IN: Monday Open Thread
BY: JohnNorthofDenver
IN: Trump/Vance Campaign Following Heidi Ganahl Playbook
BY: Early Worm
IN: Trump/Vance Campaign Following Heidi Ganahl Playbook
BY: Conserv. Head Banger
IN: Monday Open Thread
Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!
Dude is dumber than a bag of hammers. He and Brandi Bradley should get together bowling.
I’ll cut Baisley some slack. His work got the landowner liability statute revisions through the Senate during the past session of the Legislature.
Doing one arguably good thing doesn't make up for this complete delusional horseshit.
I'd have to agree. But considering how productive his fellow legislative Republicans are, one thing makes him downright statesmanlike by comparison.
Age and general un-intelligence level in one sign: "claimed in a Facebook post".
If you take that photo…enlarge the ears…remove a tooth…add freckles, move the hairline slightly and…voila!
Alfred E. Neuman.
He says he is concerned with the AI deepfake bill and reads it as "“While the motivation for that bill was to prevent AI from being used to negatively falsify a candidate’s voice or image, the language also seems to include embellishing a candidate’s popularity." Shouldn't he at least mention the potential use in producing material in Trump shares fake AI images of Taylor Swift endorsement
I noted he didn't actually, you know, file a complaint to the secretary of state's office. This means he believes in his claim just as much as we all do. More worthless lies.