U.S. Senate
See Full Big Line
(D) J. Hickenlooper*
(R) Somebody
80%
20%
Governor
See Full Big Line
(D) Michael Bennet
(D) Phil Weiser
60%↑
50%↓
Att. General
See Full Big Line
(D) M. Dougherty
(D) Jena Griswold
60%↑
40%↑
Sec. of State
See Full Big Line
(D) A. Gonzalez
(D) J. Danielson
(R) Sheri Davis
50%
40%
30%
State Treasurer
See Full Big Line
(D) Brianna Titone
(D) Jeff Bridges
(R) Kevin Grantham
40%
40%
30%
CO-01 (Denver)
See Full Big Line
(D) Diana DeGette*
(R) Somebody
90%
2%
CO-02 (Boulder-ish)
See Full Big Line
(D) Joe Neguse*
(R) Somebody
90%
2%
CO-03 (West & Southern CO)
See Full Big Line
(R) Jeff Hurd*
(D) Somebody
80%
40%
CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado)
See Full Big Line
(R) Lauren Boebert*
(D) Somebody
90%
10%
CO-05 (Colorado Springs)
See Full Big Line
(R) Jeff Crank*
(D) Somebody
80%
20%
CO-06 (Aurora)
See Full Big Line
(D) Jason Crow*
(R) Somebody
90%
10%
CO-07 (Jefferson County)
See Full Big Line
(D) B. Pettersen*
(R) Somebody
90%
10%
CO-08 (Northern Colo.)
See Full Big Line
(R) Gabe Evans*
(D) Manny Rutinel
(D) Yadira Caraveo
45%↓
40%↑
30%
State Senate Majority
See Full Big Line
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
80%
20%
State House Majority
See Full Big Line
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
95%
5%
March 08, 2023 10:59 AM UTC
13 Comments
I have to wonder about the voting thus far… Lowest scoring among Republicans:
* In the House, with a score of 45, Rep. Rick Taggart.
* In the Senate, at 46, Senator Barbara Kirkmeyer.
Going to be interesting to see results at the end of the session.
Who knew! Kirkmeyer is really a RINO!
It’s not bad enough that Fremont County had to give Colorado certified lunatic Ron Hanks, but now they’ve inflicted this lady on the state. It’s so embarrassing.
Naturally, these were the same voters who were proud to have Kevin Grantham leading the State Senate while he played defense and covered up for sexual abusers in his caucus.
Mirror, mirror on the wall, who's the most batshit crazy of us all?
I’m surprise Elisabeth Epps scored 23. I figured with her reputation as a socialist, she would be in single digits. Maybe she’s more moderate than I thought she’d be.
As you probably know, these scorecards aren't hard science, they're just "voting record compared to the organization's position." Nobody got below 14 on this one (a 3-way tie). Just for example, Epps probably got some of her goody-goody points for agreeing on bills like SB40, which passed both the House and Senate unanimously.
But it seems to me she does have something like a maverick streak, and will buck Dems time to time. Liberty scorecards like this do reward libertarian positions, and it is possible to hold far left and libertarian positions within the same corporal body.
I'm actually not surprised at all. Along with the economic "limited government" bills listed that she did not support (as one of our most left-wing members), she's highly skeptical of using police power, most any type of felony incarceration, and the like…one of our most staunch civil libertarians. So those noes would count as "small government" because they shrink the scope of governmental interference (especially in things like drug laws). My Rep. Woodrow, isn't quite as high, but I think the same logic applies to him here, as well.
Shouldn't this group more accurately be called "Colorado Tyranny Republicans"? I know those last two words together are redundant at this point.
The scorecard that counts for me is the one done by Conservation Colorado at the end of the session.
The “Liberty” scorecard is suspect anyway. Kirkmeyer isn’t the only R “scoring 60 or below.
Just the latest Nevilleish goad to keep the flock in line and laser-sight focused on gun legislation opposition.
Kevin Van Winkle’s once safe red House seat has been flipped to blue and is part of the Senate District he currently represents. Could be problematic when he’s up for reelection in 2024.
He's not up until 2026.
All the more time for it to become a little bluer. He's still in trouble.