CO-04 (Special Election) See Full Big Line

(R) Greg Lopez

(R) Trisha Calvarese

90%

10%

President (To Win Colorado) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Biden*

(R) Donald Trump

80%

20%↓

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

90%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

90%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(D) Adam Frisch

(R) Jeff Hurd

(R) Ron Hanks

40%

30%

20%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert

(R) Deborah Flora

(R) J. Sonnenberg

30%↑

15%↑

10%↓

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Dave Williams

(R) Jeff Crank

50%↓

50%↑

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

90%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) Brittany Pettersen

85%↑

 

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(R) Gabe Evans

(R) Janak Joshi

60%↑

35%↓

30%↑

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
February 24, 2023 12:43 PM UTC

Started at DeBottoms Now We're Here

  • 9 Comments
  • by: Colorado Pols
The Unambiguously Lame Duo of Reps. Scott Bottoms and Ken DeGraaf

Republicans in Colorado are working with historically small minorities in the state legislature, with just 19 of 65 seats in the State House and 12 of 35 seats in the State Senate. These micro-minorities, combined with ineffective or altogether absent leadership, makes it relatively easy for a few lawmakers to become the face of the entire GOP caucus.

As we wrote earlier, House Minority Leader Mike Lynch doesn’t appear to be all that interested in charting a reasonable path for his caucus to follow. This is how “The Unambiguously Lame Duo” of freshman Republicans from Colorado Springs have come to dominate the GOP discussion at the State Capitol in 2023. State Reps. Scott “There is No” Bottoms and Ken “Skin” DeGraaf have made a lot of noise in the first two months of the legislative session — and nearly all of it has been bad for Republicans.

Both Bottoms and DeGraaf have monopolized microphones with disgusting and/or incomprehensible arguments on subjects as diverse as promoting gas stoves and warning about nonexistent election fraud. DeGraaf even kicked off the legislative session with a gibberish speech that included an unintentionally-perfect quotation lamenting, “What we have learned from history is that we never learn from history.”

Bottoms is particularly adept at saying awful things, mostly on the subject of abortion rights. Just last week Bottoms made headlines for comparing abortion to the Holocaust.

In order to better understand just how nutty these two have been in their first few months, we compiled a list of the bills that they have sponsored in the current legislative session. Lawmakers are limited to five bills apiece; while Bottoms has only introduced four bills, the filing deadline for new legislation has passed. As you’ll see below, “The Unambiguously Lame Duo” has had difficulty finding support for their legislative proposals even among Republican colleagues.

Let’s start with Bottoms. None of his bills even made it out of a committee hearing:

 

Bottoms is laser-focused on restricting abortion rights, which speaks to DeGraaf’s quote about not learning from history. Colorado voters have said over and over and over and over that they DO NOT want restrictions on abortion rights. Bottoms also used one of his four bills to promote a thing that doesn’t even exist. There is no such thing as a pill that would “reverse” an abortion.

We wrote about Bottoms’ income tax cut proposal earlier this month. That legislation was so poorly-written that the nonpartisan Legislative Council Staff determined that middle- and lower-income Coloradans would end up paying MORE money in taxes if HB23-1063 were to become law.

As for DeGraaf, he managed to max out his allocation of bills but at least hasn’t (yet) seen all of his legislation summarily postponed indefinitely in a committee hearing:

 

DeGraaf’s list of bills run the gamut from virtually unintelligible to flat out silly.

“Distributed Ledgers Voting” has something to do with paper ballots and preventing election fraud and…frankly, who the hell knows? His “Due Process Asset Forfeiture Act” is the only one of the nine bills from Team DeBottoms that seems to have even a remotely plausible premise.

DeGraaf has a lot of red meat in his bill folder. He introduced a “guns for everyone” bill that sought to pre-emptively stop ANY prohibitions on firearms, and he was the designated carrier of the annual doomed effort to create a school vouchers program in Colorado.

Rep. Ken DeGraaf is smoking a lot of this.

And then there is HB23-1163, which was axed in the House Committee on Energy and Environment on Thursday. DeGraaf’s legislation sought to clear the air, so to speak, on his belief that carbon dioxide is being inaccurately blamed as a pollutant and a cause of Climate Change. DeGraaf enlisted the help of a couple of wacko academics to provide supportive testimony, including Dr. Paul Prentice, a fellow at the Centennial Institute at Colorado Christian University. According to Prentice’s bio at CCU, “He believes that God created you to be free, and that you cannot have a controlled economy and maintain a free society.”

Here’s a sample of Prentice’s testimony from Thursday:

PRENTICE: This whole idea of anthropomorphic, carbon dioxide driven, carbon-dating climate change. You see that, certainly, over long periods of time, the graph of temperature and the graph of carbon dioxide appear to be moving in tandem. But when you explode the graph, and look at it more carefully, so that you have 50 and 100 year time periods instead of millennia, you actually see that the lead in that is FIRST the temperature rises, and then later, the carbon dioxide increases. So if there is any causality, it’s the opposite of what people are assuming – that carbon dioxide is causing the warming. It’s actually the opposite. [Pols emphasis]

Um, yeah. At this point, Democratic Rep. Stephanie Vigil of El Paso County jumped in to comment and ask a question:

VIGIL:It sounds like you are at odds with a number of folks in your profession.

Understated, but accurate. Vigil then asked Prentice why the U.S. military is planning for climate mitigation and the construction of more renewable energy resources.

VIGIL: Why does the U.S. military not share your view on this, and why are they falling for this if indeed they are falling for something?

PRENTICE: Yes, I do not know WHY, but I know that they have fallen for it. Um…[long pause]…I’m trying to be polite here. The experience of childish, magical thinking has gotten so deep in our institutions that people don’t even think of the assumptions under which they are making these arguments. The military has taken these actions based on false assumptions.

Right. DeGraaf and THIS GUY know the real causes of Climate Change, and everybody else is doing it wrong.

Anyway, the Dynamic Dolts of Bottoms and DeGraaf have introduced a total of nine pieces of legislation. Seven of these bills have failed to advance out of a committee hearing. The final two — HB23-1086 and HB23-1170 — will be heard in committee next week.

When Republicans are trying to claw back from their micro-minorities in 2024, they’re going to need some better arguments than what “The Unambiguously Lame Duo” is presenting. As it stands now, Democrats need only to point to the lists above and say, THIS is what Republican leadership looks like. 

Comments

9 thoughts on “Started at DeBottoms Now We’re Here

  1. I sincerely doubt that Lynch has any control over Bottoms and/or DeGraaf. I suspect that the R caucus dynamic is fractured into at least 2 different groups; the semi-normal and the absolute nut job. Maybe a 3rd that’s somewhere in between those two.

    That’s a lot of fracturing for a caucus of 19. Thankfully it also means they will get nothing done but will provide a heck of a show. What would we have to talk about if there were no constant shenanigans of the perverse and extreme variety? 🍿

  2. “Distributed Ledgers Voting” has something to do with paper ballots and preventing election fraud and…frankly, who the hell knows?"

    This is an effort to stop latinos from voting plain and simple.

    What the bill does is create a database to record people's eligibility to vote (kinda like this thing we have called a voter database) but also establishes a process where a person or persons have to be at every in person voting site to challenge vet anyone voting in person who is not already in this separate database.

    So yeah, it is DOA.

  3. Blind pigs and broken clocks?

    The experience of childish, magical thinking has gotten so deep in our institutions that people don’t even think of the assumptions under which they are making these arguments.

    If irony hadn't already been so mercilessly done in over three decades ago (looking at you George H.W. Bush/The Bilderberg Group/Trilateral Commission/Blue Helmet/New World Order), this quote could have been the coodygrass.

  4. Bullshit distraction is designed to be… Bullshit distraction.

    What I want to know is: What's up with the Corporate/Koch lobbying juggernaut? 

    I mean, Libertarians and Billionaires are laser focused on pursuing the Russian Oligarch-Kleptocrat model.

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

52 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!