“News represents another form of advertising, not liberal propaganda.”
–Christopher Lasch
You must be logged in to post a comment.
BY: kwtree
IN: Monday Open Thread
BY: Conserv. Head Banger
IN: Monday Open Thread
BY: Conserv. Head Banger
IN: Thanksgiving Weekend Open Thread
BY: Sunmusing
IN: Lauren Boebert Picks Up George Santos’ Favorite Side Hustle
BY: JohnNorthofDenver
IN: Monday Open Thread
BY: JohnInDenver
IN: It’s Always Weird When Election Deniers Win The Election
BY: Conserv. Head Banger
IN: Thanksgiving Weekend Open Thread
BY: doremi
IN: It’s Always Weird When Election Deniers Win The Election
BY: kwtree
IN: Monday Open Thread
BY: Ben Folds5
IN: Monday Open Thread
Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!
full of millionaires and billionaires who donated to Romney…flying the great flag of the
UnitedStatesCaymans.I had to edit and look harder for a photo that doesn’t show the boat’s name . I was afraid to get banned for showing the name Cracker Bay
Don’t be surprised if Rmoney revives the old Presidential Yacht concept. It will fly the Cayman flag, no doubt. Or Panama, to avoid stricter US regulations. The captain will be American for appearances, the rest of the officers will be Burmese, and the personal staff will be Filipino.
A lot of jobs created.
the only meaningful business conducted at the RNC convention to date:
I wish them well.
I was all ready to be pissed at CNN for making fun of a young couple, but that was REALLY awkward.
so saccharine yes, but sincere. I’d check their papers to make sure they’re real Republicans though.
Your Steven Ludwig video is gold. THAT is absolutely hilarious.
. . . that’s a shameful waste of a damn fine looking dive boat.
Seriously?
Republican – Lubbock TX
Head explodes trying to find a way to support a tax increase that his residents don’t want.
Paraphrasing – The UN, and the black president are going to send troops into Lubbock- we gotta get ready!
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/08…
Seriously? I’ll mess with Texas.
“Rape is just another form of conception”
http://youtu.be/cat5SyMBSpk
And we take this guy seriously why?
paraphrasing –
Hey- in 2008 the economy was falling apart, and the President came to Janeville and said if we believe in you, the American worker (the good people of Janesville) then we can save this plant and it could be here in 100 years… but that plant closed and is now locked and empty.
Why would Ryan be so obviously happy that the local plant failed – when he voted for the stimulus, he sought stimulus money for the good people of Janesville, and then it failed?
BTW- I’ve been to Janesville. A lot.
Ryan and Mrs Ryan must be the thinnest people in Janesville.
Ryan gave us his sincere look and said “The plant closed within a year,” implying that Obama failed to save it. Once again, a bald-faced lie from Ryan. It is quite True that Obama didn’t save it, but it’s hard for a candidate to take any action before his inauguration.
If he had been honest, Ryan would have said
Which was apparently “We can lie through our teeth!”
First, te mayor of Lubboc needs a big boat, flying a cayman flag – to fight the invasion.and the resulting rape-conceptions, and then, when the militia is successful, they can get jobs in Janesville and get that pant up and running.
From the Denver Business Journal
Or, as the unintentional parody rag the Colorado Observer puts it:
Twitty – the BLM’s new leasing rules slow everything down! Obama isn’t a friend to the industry! Government regulations harm business in this state and consequently harm us!
Or, apparently, they don’t.
Follow me down the rabbit hole on this one, if you would.
If Republican legislatures and Secretaries of State manage to disenfranchise enough people in swing states like Ohio, Florida, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin and perhaps even Colorado, the election results could be thrown into dispute legally…
If no Electoral College delegation is designated for a state, or if that delegation is in dispute, what happens? If the EC can’t reach a 270-vote majority, the election gets thrown to… the Republican-controlled House.
Are Democrats overlooking a second level of play here?
For one thing, I’m not sure the House is “Republican controlled” for this purpose. Each state has one vote. Colorado’s 4-3 delegation would thus cast one vote for Romney. a delegation like Texas, overwhelmingly Republican, also gets one vote, as does California’s overwhelmingly Democratic. A state tied, 2-2, would be unable to cast a vote unless one caved.
Realistically, this won’t happen, I think it last happened with Henry Clay as speaker, when they gave the office to John Quincy Adams who then made Clay Secretary of State, then the stepping stone to the presidency, in the famous corrupt bargain.
But the Supreme Court now sees itself as the Electoral College and would presumably give the presidency to Romney before the House could act.
There were no states in dispute when the House had to act, it was merely split between
four candidates: Jackson, Adams, a guy I forget who finished third and Clay, fourth. The House has to choose between the top three so Clay, with his iron rule on the House, had to settle for being kingmaker, not king.
What happens if no presidential candidate gets 270 Electoral votes?
If no candidate receives a majority of Electoral votes, the House of Representatives elects the President from the 3 Presidential candidates who received the most Electoral votes. Each state delegation has one vote. The Senate would elect the Vice President from the 2 Vice Presidential candidates with the most Electoral votes. Each Senator would cast one vote for Vice President. If the House of Representatives fails to elect a President by Inauguration Day, the Vice-President Elect serves as acting President until the deadlock is resolved in the House.
Wikipedia says 33 states have Republican majorities in the House vs. 16 Democrat. Thus, it would be an easy Republican victory if it did go to the existing House. A long deadlock might put it into the House elected this November, but even if Ds regained control, they would be unlikely to have a majority of the states, as opposed to a majority of the whole body.
Are Obamas numbers so in the toilet that PR above actually offered this vast conspiracy notion that he dreamt up?
Dude, stay away from the bong or at least dont blog and smoke within an hour of taking up your medicine.
I was thinking of what happened when some significant fraction of the million PA voters without ID that meets the new hastily-passed Republican standards file a joint lawsuit and block the PA delegation from being appointed.
Get rid of the delegates from enough swing states that Obama is winning according to the polls right now, and it becomes a contested electoral college. IIRC, the EC doesn’t elect a President on a simple majority – it has to be 270+, even if 50 delegates are missing.
Republicans win, even if the courts rule against them after the election. Remember, in 2000, the Florida legislature was willing to appoint a Republican EC slate in the event that the recount was upheld; that would have put the delegation in contention, and the dispute would have been resolved as Voyageur notes above – in favor of George Bush, and to hell with the recount results. So this isn’t an idle conspiracy theory – we almost went there 12 years ago.
Hell, worst case scenario, Romney still loses these states and Republicans file suit saying that the voting process was flawed because of the new law. Could at least tie up the EC delegation for a while and send it to the Republican controlled legislatures of those states.
I don’t think the Florida legislature’s award of the electoral votes to Bush would have caused the election to go to the House. The legislature pretty clearly has that power under the constitution and the Supreme Court would probably have simply upheld their right to do so.
That, to me, was why the court’s 5-4 majority was so stupid, to take the heat for this case. Let the legislture do what it was clearly poised to do and the blame would have fallen on them, not the court. Alas, Judicial Restraint is a lost concept with that Court’s majority.
Had the court not ruled that the secretaries count and recounts were in fact valid as called for under FL law then Dems would have screamed and hollered that the court forewent action to let the GOP steal the election.
The court provided what the Dems asked for, a ruling on the merits of Fl law and the legal processes that FL performed in coming to the decision that Bush in fact won FL.
Dems will wrongly claim that Bush stole the election, when in fact the rule of law was followed and upheld by the government workers.
Gores screw up was not engaging Clinton and failing to budget another $1-3million for the FL battle.
At the end of the day Team Gore didn’t win becuase they had a failed message.
was to call for a targeted recount rather than a statewide recount. Had he done that and the Supreme Court not intervened, he would have won Florida and the Presidency.
To be count. You can suppose or dream up any facts you’d dare dream create in your little mind. The fact is the count and recounts showed that Bush won FL.
You blame Gore for his own loss andw that may very well be true …. taking responsibility and accountability for outcomes is unique for Democrats who usually operate in the collective.
If we are to concur with you we must know that Gore didn’t want everyone’s ballot to count, he was only trying to achieve selective changes that he hoped would swing the state. The problem was he failed at achieving his section strategy too.
Go to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U…
Scroll down to: Post election studies
Depending on standards chosen by the groups studying the count, the results are all over the place. Some for Gore, some for Bush, some by a tiny margin, some by a significant margin.
Totally subjective, found under the same heading, is a poll of voters done in December felt that Gore won 49% to 40%.
The best brains in America have tried to find the correct answer. They couldn’t. You can believe what you want, but it isn’t factual.
100+
while parsing is cq that studies still differ, I believe post election studies showed that the statewide recount, which Gore wrongly thought would hurt him, was actually the one that put him over the top. Be ccareful what you wish for.
As for the court ruling, PR, remember that it was 7-2 in overturning the state court action. It was only the the drastic remedy of saying what the hell, make Bush President, that the court split 5-4 and entered the political thicket. They should have let it go at the 7-2
(all but Ginsberg and Stevens if memory serves) and let the system run its course — which would, inevitably, resulted in the Fla. Lege awarding the votes to Bush.
http://www.newschannel5.com/st…
Per the Arapahoe County clerk’s website. Registered voter statistics as of 8/30/12:
Dem 123,227
Rep 115,384
“Other” 123,031
Total 362,157
That’s a 7,843 voter lead for Dems over the GOP. WOW! (You can see these numbers when you click on “my registration”. The numbers are shown at the top of the screen.)
But, I’m confused. Elsewhere on that website under voter statistics they show the following as of July, 2012:
Dem 78,472
Rep 88,083
Unaffil 72,654
Other 1,633
Total Active Registered Voters 241,196
That’s a lead for the GOP of 9,611. Also, the total increased between July and August by 120,961 voters.
What is going on??
OFA has always been good with them.
And there’s a big push this year due to the Republican attempts at “cleansing” the rolls, too. Democrats have made voter registration and updating registrations a top priority.
Good job, OFA (including the staffer living in our basement since March)!
You’re really going to get it from dwyer now, Caroman! Don’t you know that OFA and all its works, especially voter registration, are futile?
I’d thank you for hosting that volunteer but I don’t want to face the Wrath of Dwyer. Was that lightning? Gotta go!
and lock the kid inside on Sunday afternoons from now on, huh?
Gadommit! The way to win this election is to blog and bitch at the campaign so as to influence the candidate.
Voter Reg and GOTV are nothing compared to blogging persuasively.
Here’s a 1997 quote from Westword about one of Colorado’s platform committee members”
“‘Guy Short is a low-life, miserable slimeball,’ says Senator Ken Chlouber, a Republican from Leadville”
Sounds about right
It’s too bad our other member, Suzanne Sharkey, happens to be my CU Regent. Glad my family is all CSU and UNC alumni.
I’ll be tuned in for the 3rd installment of the RCN, recording it on TiVo. We figured we’d keep the 3 nights available for replay over the next four and a half years.
1. If Obama wins we can watch it and dream about what could have been assuming we continue to see failing results.
2. If Romney wins we’ll have a record of accountability to judge he and Ryan on in 2016.
does it excite you somehow ?
…and hanging with our four shorties
mystery speaker. Kind of sad.
Oh yeah….
I guess they were running low on angry, old, white men.
Sadly for Obama he was spot on in calling for the Rookie to be traded out.
Wolfe Blitzer is in full freakout mode and some CNN talking head has her nostrils flaring.
Sure Obamybots are probably inflamed at Clint for taking it directly to the empty chair representing Obama. It was good to see some comedy injected and used to call BS on the failed Obama leadership.
I can either watch the Broncos vs. Arizona in an exhibitian game or the Republican National Conventiopn. One is an adolescent game played by overpaid egomaniacs with no real meaning for the long-term outcome of events.
The other is a football game.
lie to me Mitt, LIE TO ME !!!
….because the numbers from last night’s bullshit fest shows how much America wants to watch rich white guys lie their asses off…
http://www.nydailynews.com/ent…
‘tad, it seems from these numbers that the average American no longer buys the frogwash the Repubican’t party is spewing on TV.
Combine the outrageous lies of Ryan with the corrupt and shameful treatment of the Ron Paul Delegates, and it seems this election is already over….
what is Sarah Palin up to these days ?
Oh, nevermind
tonight, I’d be more inclined to check out the action in Hooterville . . .
http://www.9news.com/news/side…
State by State forecasting all down the right-hand side of this NYT article.
http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.n…
think I’ll study it a bit before ‘tad tells me what it means
But us taxpayers saved his ass….
http://www.rollingstone.com/po…
Arapabot, ‘tad, we’re waiting!
Thanks.
Caught a bit of the opening prayer; didn’t say the J word, but talked about salvation through. Nothing about the Angel Moroni, so maybe not Mormon? But the clincher is the old closing, “In Jesus’ name, Amen.”
There was a mention about how blessed we are to be able to worship as our consciences dictate, but I just got the vibes that meant Catholic, Baptist (which one?), Mormon, Episcopal.
Buddhists, Muslims, Jews, Hindus, Atheists: Listen up, we don’t want you! Nor do we want blacks, women, or too many Hispanics.
Coming in 2016: A smaller RNC venue.
(Did somebody already post this today? I couldn’t find any diaries about it.) The story is buried deep on the political page of the local paper.
Gessler announced today that supporters fell 3,859 signatures short.
Is it too cynical to think that Gessler, who’s clearly prone to interpreting rules in the GOP’s favor, is playing politics yet again? Republicans will most assuredly fare better in November if independent-minded women stay home.
didn’t scroll down to Wednesday posts…
Watching Willard wax wondrously with wisdom, with wit, Rhetorical renderings remove remaining reservations.
Teleprompter tingles transit trousers!
Most of what I’ve seen is that he could have taken lessons from John McCain.
Guess the Republicans have officially decided to “go there” again this year.
No one should give a fuck about celebrity endorsements anyway, but how about this as a reflection of their vetting?
If he’d only been gov for just under 1/2 term, he could be VP.
Unless, of course, they are (rarely) on The Side of Wrong.
President Obama asks for more time to finish what he started.
Doesn’t he mean to start what he’s been thinking about doing ?
who knew? The verdict, excruciatingly embarrassing both for the poorly aging star and for the campaign, seems to be near universal.
Mitt gives the most passable speech of his campaign, fact and detail free as ever but he did present much better, and the only thing anybody is going to be talking about is the strange Eastwood episode. This while the media, for a change, is still giving coverage to fact checking all the lies Ryan crammed into his speech the day before.
A rambling, crude, unrehearsed stand up routine with an empty chair really, really wasn’t what the Romney camp had in mind. Naturally the crowd loved it but then these are people who cheer things like the Texas death penalty record and of course they’re already voting R.
Not likely that Clint’s clearly fading star power is going to inflate the bump much after this pathetic performance.