U.S. Senate See Full Big Line

(D) J. Hickenlooper*

(R) Somebody

80%

20%

(D) Michael Bennet

(D) Phil Weiser

60%↑

50%↓

Att. General See Full Big Line

(D) M. Dougherty

(D) Jena Griswold

(D) David Seligman

40%

40%

30%

Sec. of State See Full Big Line
(D) A. Gonzalez

(D) J. Danielson

(R) Sheri Davis
50%

40%

30%
State Treasurer See Full Big Line

(D) Brianna Titone

(D) Jeff Bridges

(R) Kevin Grantham

40%

40%

30%

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Hurd*

(D) Somebody

80%

40%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert*

(D) Trisha Calvarese

(D) Eileen Laubacher

90%

20%

20%

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Crank*

(D) Somebody

80%

20%

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) B. Pettersen*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(R) Gabe Evans*

(D) Manny Rutinel

(D) Yadira Caraveo

45%↓

40%↑

30%

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
July 24, 2012 08:37 PM UTC

Winning Is Not an Option?

  • 11 Comments
  • by: American Patriot

A Commentary by American Patriot

“What the hell is wrong with you Tea Party idiots?  It’s not about winning, it’s about the game; the juice is in the game!  The worst thing that could happen would be for us to beat the Democrats.  That would be game over.  That would be anarchy.  You people need to get with the program.  We supply the game, the people supply the money.  They pay us for the privilege of playing the game.  We push their buttons with the issues and they write the checks.  Everybody’s happy; everybody wins and we don’t need a bunch of Tea Party crusaders “holding our feet to the fire” or any of the rest of that Tea Party BS.”

The above statement is an off the record quote from one of the party bosses in response to the suggestion that if they really wanted to beat the Democrats, they should be selling conservative rather than Republican. One of the frustrations of the TEA Party has long been the refusal of the Republican Party to accept (support) conservative candidates.  It just didn’t make sense that a political party would ignore the numbers if they really wanted to win.  We’ve watched one election after another go down the tubes because the Republican Party continues to field milquetoast moderates instead of conservative candidates.

Here are the facts.  Registered Republicans make up 18% of the voting demographic while registered Democrats number 34% of that same demographic.  Conclusion; Republicans go into every election with at 16 point disadvantage.  Why would they do that when they could be winning every election because 40% of voters are self described conservatives while only 22% of voters are self described liberals?  That gives conservatives an 18% advantage in every election and the numbers are even higher here on the western slope.  

So why do we have a Democrat governor and two Democrat Senators?  To the Tea Party that seemed a fair question.  And the answer appears to be self evident.  It is more important to the Republican Party for their party to win than for conservatives to win.  But like all logic, that conclusion is in the eye of the beholder.  That was before we realized “the juice was in the game” not in the winning.  And the juice is what it’s all about.  

All that time we’d been playing the wrong game.  We were totally vulnerable.  We didn’t have a wall of surrogates and shill groups or bank accounts stuffed with special interest money.  We just fell off the turnip truck and found ourselves in a high stakes, no holds barred poker game where everybody at the table only had one goal; to beat us.  We were the interlopers in a game of partisan politics that really wasn’t a game of partisan politics.  

We were looking at the pot in the middle of the table while the political parties were only interested in the ante; the sure thing, the game that they can’t lose.  They were the house.   They got paid regardless of who drug the pot, who won the election.  The issues; gun control, abortion, environmental, etc, etc were just the come on.  The issues are what get the players off the turnip truck and into the game and eventually the antes are what empty your pockets through the inevitability of gradualism.

The longer you stay in the game, the more you lose.  And eventually you end up betting the farm just trying to break even.  That’s the game and it’s the only game in town but the game has a problem; less and less people are playing.  That’s why you perceive the issues to be more and more radical and life altering.  If the house (political parties) is to stay in business, they have to attract new players.

There has to be a continuum of pockets to pick clean and every four years the turnip truck arrives right on schedule.  The players unload and the suckers with their pockets turned inside out line the street with their thumbs out hoping to catch a ride back to the farm; if they still have a farm.  And the game goes on.  You bet your life the game goes on.

So if you pass a person wearing a yellow Tea Party hat with his pockets turned inside out (coming from a political party event), his thumb out on your way out of town, for God’s sake don’t stop and give him a lift.  But you might consider throwing your spare change out the window in empathy with a person who lost everything they had trying to win back the farm we call our country in the rigged game of juice where the only change must come from the people.  

And maybe a little further down that road you’ll find a yellow Tea Party hat alongside the road blowing in the wind that you can recover and keep as your own.  Inside the sweatband you’ll see a label that reads; “Made in the USA, One size fits all”.

Comments

11 thoughts on “Winning Is Not an Option?

  1. You seem to be talking about statewide elections (the next paragraph begins, “why do we have a Democrat governor and two Democrat Senators?”), but this state is not 18% R vs 34% D.

    So, when you condescendingly declare, “Here are the facts…,” how is that “fact” true?

      1. that all politics is local; well yeah, but if that were true you wouldn’t be able to use half the stats.  And Mr. Rove’s white board is internationally recognized as an authority on stats that fit.   He’s the unofficial Wikipedia of partisan politics.  And here’s another one of my favorite quotes; “but I am honest and I’m always willing to clarify”.  But you’ll have to wait till closer to the election for full disclosure on that quote.  

      2. * Dems are 31%, Repubs 27% per Gallup earlier this year

        * Both parties ebb and flow, but never ever ever anything close to the bullshit number you’re peddling, the 1988-2011 data show (below link)

        http://www.gallup.com/poll/151

        Oh, and it’s Karl with a K; not to nitpick spelling because your idiocy runs much deeper, but anyone who actually pays attention to politics would have read Rove’s name like 8000 times — more than enough to know he’s not “Carl.”

          1. I’ll pay you the courtesy of assuming you’re not a two-digit-IQ slowpoke, and that instead you’re smart enough to know that what you’re saying is bullshit.

      1. it just occurred to me.  You probably think I was talking about a Dem Party boss.  Now you may have gotten that idea from a press statement made by Mesa County Republican  Chairperson Ruth Ehlers in which she claimed Mesa County Repubs don’t have party bosses which is probably why they’re losing so many elections lately.  Nobody down there knows who’s in charge.  And like I said before; I didn’t believe it either.  

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Gabe Evans
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

191 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!

Colorado Pols