President (To Win Colorado) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Biden*

(R) Donald Trump



CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*


CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*


CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(D) Adam Frisch

(R) Jeff Hurd

(R) Ron Hanks




CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) J. Sonnenberg (R) Lauren Boebert (R) Ted Harvey

15% 10%↓ 10%

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Dave Williams

(R) Doug Bruce

(R) Bob Gardner




CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*


CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) Brittany Pettersen



CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(R) Scott James

(R) Gabe Evans




State Senate Majority See Full Big Line





State House Majority See Full Big Line





Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
October 06, 2022 02:13 PM UTC

Heidi Ganahl's Furry-Baiting Is Not Victimless

  • by: Colorado Pols
Republican gubernatorial candidate Heidi Ganahl (R).

In the last couple of weeks since Republican gubernatorial nominee Hiedi Heidi Ganahl decided entirely of her own volition to make a costume subculture (what’s known as “cosplay”) called “furries” the central moral panic driving her campaign, Ganahl has been brutally lampooned for recycling a widely-spread and debunked conservative conspiracy theory suggesting that children are (note the loaded language) “identifying as animals.” 9NEWS’ Kyle Clark compiled a Twitter thread of examples of similar “furry panic” from Republicans around the country including Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene and Minnesota’s Republican candidate for governor–each instance debunked, but instead of fading away simply finding new geography in which to spread.

Although the general response to Ganahl’s inexplicable doubling down on this ludicrous distraction with just a few weeks left in her stumbling campaign for governor has been laughter and even some amount of pity, there’s a darker side to Ganahl’s crusade to demonize the “furries” that bears (no pun intended) some examination. As Slate reported in May in their own examination of the GOP’s 2022 “furry panic,” the real purpose here is delegitimizing LGBTQ+ people as a class:

Furries are not people who think they are animals. [Pols emphasis] They are broadly recognized as people with varying degrees of aesthetic interest in anthropomorphic animals or characters. Sometimes they draw original artworks of popular cartoon animals like Bugs Bunny and Star Fox. Sometimes they dress up in full costumes (known as “fursuits”), designed to look like anthropomorphic characters they’ve imagined. And there are furry conventions where such enthusiasts gather in various cities to meet other members of the community whom they’ve only met online, buy art works, and fundraise for charities, among other activities.

Kameron Dunn, a furries expert and researcher who’s previously written about these subcultures for Slate, explained that there’s a common misconception “that furries pretend to be animals” because of sick sexual fetishes. But that in reality, furrydom is about imagination and community, not transformation: “It’s through this aesthetic interest that they’re able to endeavor on role-play, and join nerdy communities to express that creativity,” he said.

The current misrepresentation of furries—that they simply want to be animals and are sexual deviants—dates back decades. Both Dunn and Joe Strike, another furry historian and community member, recalled an infamous 2003 episode of CSI that, in the words of another furry documentarian, “portrayed the community as a community of sexual deviants who like to have sex in fur costumes,” despite the fact that such fetishists “probably represent about 2 percent of the fandom.”

DC Comics cosplayers at Comic Con San Diego 2017.

Although we’re not personally in the demographic that attends cosplay conventions, be they about superheroes or pirates or cartoon characters or historical re-enactors, we can’t deny there’s a robust culture (not to mention industry) who avidly pursues this stuff as a hobby, and have for many years. It’s only in 2022 with conservatives in a generalized state of panic about what they see as society’s imminent collapse that “furry” cosplayers are being hauled in front of the court of public opinion for their turn as scapegoats in the ongoing political culture wars.

None of which works unless you grossly exaggerate what’s happening from harmless cosplay into people “identifying as animals,” a statement engineered to denigrate transgender people. Are the kids who dress up like Superman at the yearly comic book conventions “identifying as Superman?” Does dressing up like Bugs Bunny mean you literally think you’re Bugs Bunny? Of course not.

In an insightful story everyone who has spent a moment of time on Ganahl’s “furry panic” should read, Denver7’s Colette Bordelon spoke with a young person directly in the path of Ganahl’s coded appeal to prejudice, who reminded us that what she’s doing has actual victims: kids in schools.

“I know exactly where she got this claim because I saw it, and it was on an anti-LGBTQ post on Reddit. And I saw this post, and I was like, ‘oh my God, this is the stupidest thing ever,'” Johnson said, after showing several similar posts on the website. “I am honestly at a loss for words because she’s using something that is fake, and she’s twisting what reality is so that she can target LGBTQ kids.” [Pols emphasis]

Johnson called the assertions misinformation, and said they attack the legitimacy of children who identify as LGBTQ+.

“It’s targeting my community because they’re spreading lies about us and making us unsafe, and that’s frightening to me,” Johnson said. “We are already so discriminated against, we’re questioned on a daily basis just by identifying as who we are, and to not be safe in that is life-threatening.”

Underneath the veneer of absurdity, for which Ganahl is rightly being ridiculed, there’s something actually quite troubling. It tells us how Heidi Ganahl thinks about much more than “furries.” Ganahl’s false equivalence between cosplay and gender transition by suggesting that people who engage in “furry” cosplay are “identifying as animals,” taken in its full context, is essentially saying that gender transition is like putting on a costume. If that’s not a slur against the rights of every LGBTQ+ American, we can’t tell you what is. Everywhere Heidi Ganahl looks, be it the hallways of our public schools or walking the streets of downtown Denver in broad daylight, Ganahl sees otherness to be afraid of.

Heidi Ganahl needs therapy, not power.


12 thoughts on “Heidi Ganahl’s Furry-Baiting Is Not Victimless

  1. I agree – it is a coordinated national conservative communications effort to take away meaning from the word "identify", thus causing harm to LGBTQ kids and making all of them feel a little bit more like freaks, and Heidi went all in on to the idea. You know, the kids Heidi says she has so much sympathy and compassion for.

    Thanks Heidi. Fuck you Heidi.

  2. Still breathlessly waiting for the photographic proof she claims to have provided media outlets.  BTW- Boebert has also jumped on the furry bandwagon, of course.

    Ganahl for Governor:  worst campaign ever.

  3. Although she's slipped into absurd self-parody of right-wing "concern trolling", it's actually horrifying when you consider that schools have had to deal with baseless absurd right-wing moral panic attacks for years.

    It was masks during Covid, and then CRT content in kindergarten, and then gender identity grooming in middle school… a degenerating mass mental illness of made-up bullsh*t.

    Only now that we've reached this point is it sinking in how much this sort of crap hurts schools and distracts them from more important concerns.

  4. Anyone who is around kids, such as a parent or grandparent know kids are scared to go to school. They do active shooter drills. The teachers are on edge.  And what are we adults  doing to support kids and teachers?  Sone of us just hug when we can and up the toys and candy, knowing that is not nearly enough.   

    What is Heidi doing? Self-induging crap  As far as I am concerned, if wearing furry headbands help the kids manage, then I am all for it! To supermpose a right wing propaganda on our kids is outrageous!!  IF you can't help, leave them alone…if wearing costumes sometimes helps, then bring on Halloween every day. 

    The problem may be that our kids are too bright.  They read, they listen.  They know some schools have had active shooters.  They know about Ubalde, even if they  can't pronounce it. 

    And if anyone needs a litter box, it is the talk show host that practically wets his pants talking about Heidi and her kiddie cats.

  5. Heidi has obviously never met anyone in science fiction fandom. Those people are hard-core. Some of them eat, sleep, live and breathe fandom. They travel the country following the convention circuit. They dress in costumes of admired characters and can quote whole films or books from memory. But few of them think they are aliens. It’s bad enough for her that she’s going to get clobbered in November; does she really want the record for the worst campaign ever? It’s hard to beat Dan Maes’ performance, but Heidi’s doing her best.


  6. From the post: "It’s only in 2022 with conservatives in a generalized state of panic about what they see as society’s imminent collapse that 'furry' cosplayers are being hauled in front of the court of public opinion for their turn as scapegoats in the ongoing political culture wars."

    In my opinion, conservatives (actually the off-the-deep-end GOP), are not panicked by the possibility of society's collapse. They actually WANT society to collapse because they believe they could then move in and take over, with authoritarian fake-Christian rule. What's so interesting is this cult characteristic of telling blatant ridiculous lies – used by Trump in so many ways such as advocating for hydroxychloroquine for COVID, suggesting we need to shine lights inside our bodies, and of course the Big Lie – blatant lies that cult followers are REQUIRED to believe and promote. It's part of the cult!


  7. Just to cross pollinate the two strains of insanity, would Heidi be concerned about entrusting the furries to Dr. Memet Oz given the allegations of puppy abuse? 

    Asking for a friend.

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments

Posts about

Donald Trump

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo

Posts about

Colorado House

Posts about

Colorado Senate

60 readers online now


Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!