Boebert STILL Using Her Campaign Account Like a Piggy Bank?

UPDATE: CNBC’s Brian Schwartz:

Federal officials are pressing Rep. Lauren Boebert, R-Colo., for answers on the apparent personal use of thousands of dollars in campaign funds.

A letter from the Federal Election Commission to the treasurer of Boebert’s 2022 reelection campaign inquired about four Venmo payments totaling over $6,000.

FEC filings show the payments came between May and June for what’s described on the forms as “personal expense of Lauren Boebert billed to campaign account in error.” The filings then note that the “expense has been reimbursed.”

A spokesman for Boebert told CNBC that the personal expenses were already reimbursed but did not say what the payments were for…

—–

As readers know, freshman GOP Rep. Lauren Boebert stepped into scandal early this year after huge personal “reimbursements” totaling over $22,000 from her campaign account we first wrote about the previous December, allegedly for miles driven during Boebert’s 2020 campaign for Congress–an amount that dwarfed the expenses reimbursed to Boebert’s predecessor Rep. Scott Tipton in his decade of campaigning, and was found in several investigations to have been arithmetically improbable at best. Additional questions were raised after it came out that Boebert had paid off just under $20,000 in state tax liens on the Shooters’ Grill just a couple of weeks before she received the mileage check last November.

The Federal Election Commission sent a letter to Boebert’s campaign yesterday–and in addition to pointing out a number of excessive donations that needed refunding from Boebert’s latest quarterly report, there’s still more concern about personal use of campaign funds:

Personal use is any use of funds in a campaign account of a present or former candidate to fulfill a commitment, obligation or expense of any person that would exist irrespective of the candidate’s campaign or duties as a federal office holder. Schedule B of your report discloses a disbursement that appears to possibly constitute personal use of campaign funds by the candidate (see attached), as defined at 11 CFR § 113.1(g).

Please review the purpose of disbursement in question and provide clarification regarding its nature. If the disbursement in question does indeed constitute personal use, the committee should seek reimbursement for the appropriate amount of the personal use violation from the beneficiary. In addition, you should amend your report showing this reimbursement on Schedule A supporting Line 15 of the Detailed Summary Page of the report covering the period in which the reimbursement is received. If the disbursement(s) in question was incompletely or incorrectly reported, you must also amend your original report with the clarifying information.

Finally, if it is determined that the disbursement(s) constitutes the personal use of campaign funds, the Commission may consider taking further legal action. However, prompt action to obtain reimbursement of the funds in question will be taken into consideration.

Here are the reimbursements that caught the FEC’s attention:

So folks, these are pretty sizable personal expenses “billed to the campaign account in error,” and they appear from the amounts involved to be recurring expenses. The FEC says that “promptly” reimbursing the funds in question, which Boebert’s campaign claims was done at some unspecified time after the expenses were incurred, “will be taken into consideration.” But even if reimbursed, a pattern of such expenses billed and reimbursed “in error” could still constitute an improper use of campaign accounts to obtain what amount to interest-free short-term loans.

You can only make the same “mistake” so many times before it becomes something other than a mistake.

9 Community Comments, Facebook Comments

  1. Conserv. Head Banger says:

    OK. We already knew that Boebert is a Trump worshipping sleaze-oid.

    What Pols doesn’t realize is that this is not, at this time, an issue to arouse the ire of the average voter in the 3rd District. You’ve behaving like the kid’s tale of the boy who cried wolf. He did it so often, like you’re doing with Boebert, that when the wolf finally arrived, nobody paid attention.

  2. JohnInDenver says:

    Putting a transactional vendor (Venmo) on the record rather than the REAL name of the person seems odd to me. The other lines don't list the credit cards, names of banks with checking accounts — has anyone gone to look if Rep. Boebert's campaign accepted other "donations" under the name of a financial institution?

    Going back to find WHAT expenses were "billed to campaign in error" ought to be a part of the explanation, too.

     

  3. gertie97 says:

    Grifters gotta grift.

  4. Sparky says:

    Well of course she is – she got away with it the first time, why wouldn't she keep doing it?

  5. JohnInDenver says:

    Today's AP update on Boebert:  AP – Colorado’s Boebert discloses husband’s work for energy firm

    Fairly amazing … Mr. Boebert appears to have improved his fortunes — literally.

    Colorado Rep. Lauren Boebert’s husband made $478,000 last year working as a consultant for an energy firm, information that was not disclosed during Boebert’s congressional campaign and only reported in her financial disclosure forms filed this week.

    In paperwork filed with the House of Representatives on Tuesday, the Republican congresswoman reported that her husband, Jayson Boebert, received the money as a consultant to “Terra Energy Productions” in 2020, and earned $460,000 as a consultant for the firm in 2019.

    In her previous filing, Boebert reported her income as coming from a gun-themed restaurant she and her husband run in Rifle, Colorado, and an affiliated smokehouse. Boebert also listed “Boebert Consulting — spouse” on the candidate form, but listed her husband’s income source as “N/A.”

    … “The spouse is supposed to disclose the source of all earned income and this doesn’t add up with what was in the prior filing,” Payne said,

     

  6. Genghis says:

    Sloebert is grifting sack of shit? Well, damn! Who could have foreseen that?!

Leave a Reply

Comment from your Facebook account


You may comment with your Colorado Pols account above (click here to register), or via Facebook below.