CO-04 (Special Election) See Full Big Line

(R) Greg Lopez

(R) Trisha Calvarese

90%

10%

President (To Win Colorado) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Biden*

(R) Donald Trump

80%

20%↓

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

90%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

90%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(D) Adam Frisch

(R) Jeff Hurd

(R) Ron Hanks

40%

30%

20%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert

(R) Deborah Flora

(R) J. Sonnenberg

30%↑

15%↑

10%↓

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Dave Williams

(R) Jeff Crank

50%↓

50%↑

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

90%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) Brittany Pettersen

85%↑

 

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(R) Gabe Evans

(R) Janak Joshi

60%↑

35%↓

30%↑

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
September 23, 2010 07:15 PM UTC

Um, That's ILLEGAL

  • 17 Comments
  • by: Colorado Pols

You might remember Republican Kathleen Conti, who is challenging Democratic Rep. Joe Rice in HD-38. We first mentioned Conti a few months ago when we noticed her rather bizarre claims that there were terrorist training camps in operation in Colorado.

Those comments were indicative of a candidate who was perhaps a few sandwiches short of a picnic, but they were otherwise fairly harmless. That’s not the case with a letter, dated September 20, that Conti sent out to supporters. You can see an image of the letter here, which is problematic for a number of reasons. The letter contains numerous references to direction she has received from unnamed Republican officials, starting with the opening paragraph:

The campaign is in full swing and going very well. I had a recent meeting with a GOP representative and they are saying that I currently have a slight lead–somewhere between 4-8 percentage points! [Pols emphasis]

Why is this a problem? Because Conti isn’t supposed to be coordinating with outside groups on her campaign. This is illegal.

Conti is talking about a specific poll done in her race that was not funded by her campaign, which is information that she is legally not supposed to know about. Sure, state legislative candidates hear whispers about polling numbers all the time, but none of them — until now, anyway — are dumb enough to put it in writing.

We would expect to be hearing much more about this story in the coming days, and no doubt so will Conti. Attorneys are probably dialing her number already.

Comments

17 thoughts on “Um, That’s ILLEGAL

  1. I don’t think it’s illegal for a candidate to coordinate or communicate with representatives of their party.  I’m pretty sure that illegality only arises when candidates coordinate with outside 527s, 501(c)4’s, and other outside groups.

    So, what’s the story here?  Why is this on the front page?

    1. Parties can only contribute to state candidates as though they were individuals; if the party sets up a small donor committee, then they operate under those limits.

      If a party organization commissions a poll, then the only way for them to get it to the candidate is to either make an in-kind donation to the candidate (which is likely to exceed their contribution limit), or make the poll public (the candidate gets the info, but so does everyone else…).

  2. Boy that was a quantum leap to concluding that there was illegal coordination going on – a reference to an unnamed GOP representative means absolutely nothing unless that representative (whether an R, D or U) was affiliated with an entity that is barred from coordinating with candidates.  What if the GOP representative was simply a member of the Southwest Swashbuckler Breakfast Club and had been present when some pollster made a breakfast prsentation and gave out those numbers?

    Come on Pols, let’s settle down and do a little more thinking before blathering.

  3. Political parties can coordinate with candidates.

    In fact, if memory serves, despite Amendment 27, the US Supreme Court allows political parties to do unlimited “coordinated” independent expenditures for their candidates.

    That stems from the 1986 Wirth / Kramer campaign.

    Now, if she met with a 527 rep, that’s a different story.

  4. doesn’t have enough money to pay their trackers, let alone put polls out into the field.  i’ll bet money this came to Conti’s ears from whichever GOP rep is working the 527 side of things – read ILLEGAL.

  5. Trust me. This twit isn’t going to beat Colonel Rice. I’ve been involved as a volunteer in HD38 politics for years and through both of Joe’s previous elections and Conti will go down just like the others.

    My unaffiliated husband just received a mailing (paid for by Our Colorado Values) that read like a love letter to Joe from South Metro Chamber of Commerce.  It calls him Colonel Tax-Cutter and quoted John Brackney, President of the Chamber, praising him for cutting ” two obscene taxes”; the business personal property tax and the tax on charity and fundraisers for public schools.

    As per the former, turns out the costs of complying with regulations were so burdensome and the cost of collecting the paltry sums so out of whack with the amount collected it was a really silly tax with no upside for anyone. Pretty much ditto with  the burden of figuring taxes on the proceeds of school bake sales and such that make up for lack of sufficient school funding at no cost to local or state governments.

    Mailer also mentions that he wrote a law to target credits to small businesses that create jobs and to make sure they have access to loans.  He voted to freeze property tax rates. Take that, GOPers.

    Oh and something he won’t mention but others will; his multiple decorations for exemplary service during 4 tours in Iraq. The last tour was the result of his being specially requested by a three star to serve on his staff for his expertise in dealing with US/Iraqi interface during the transition from US to Iraqi military responsibility. Hometown hero for the SUV magnet crowd if there ever was one.

    Expect a concentrated heavily funded Rice blitz, both from the campaign and outside groups, that will obliterate Conti. Joe is no rookie anymore so his campaign will spend the most when it counts the most. She probably has good early polling numbers only because she got a bunch of signs out early so people have seen her name.  The Rice campaign started getting their signs out later so they make a fresher impression going into the election while the opponent’s signs have become month old wall paper. Joe’s signs are now spreading all over the place.

    Rice may tick off progressives because he’s so much more centrist than what they would prefer (oddly they love the nearly equally centrist Romanoff. Go figure) but they know they won’t get anybody more progressive elected in HD38 so Dems join chamber types and vets in supporting Joe. Conti should enjoy the ego boost of an early and probably not very accurate poll before it’s just a faded memory. Badly as the GOP wants this formerly rock solid safe R district back (it’s embarrassing to  see it in D hands), their next chance will be when Joe leaves on his own or reaches term limit, not before.

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

177 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!