As the Denver Post’s Justin Wingerter reports, Sen. Bernie Sanders’ campaign arrived in downtown Denver last night, and proved again Sanders’ ability to rally massive adoring crowds:
Thousands of people sojourned to Civic Center park early Monday night, where they loudly and proudly cheered on Bernie Sanders as the progressive presidential contender denounced insurance companies, the fossil fuel industry and America’s military industrial complex…
The 78-year-old democratic socialist senator from Vermont, a darling of liberals young and old, made a loud return to Colorado, 11 months after he stumped for now-Gov. Jared Polis and U.S. Rep. Joe Neguse last October in Boulder and Fort Collins.
“I am here in Denver asking your support for more than just defeating Trump,” Sanders told the cheering crowd in a raspy, cracking voice. “I am here to ask you to help me transform this country and create an economy and government that works for all of us, not just the 1 percent.”
We expect nothing less than a big show of support for Sanders in Colorado, a state where he is in the lead according to a recent poll–though by a single point, with Joe Biden statistically tied and Elizabeth Warren vacuuming up loose votes to settle into a strong third place. Biden will be in Colorado later in September, and Warren is due soon with her last rally in April in Aurora also drawing a very respectable crowd.
But make no mistake: the size and enthusiasm of Bernie’s base in Colorado is formidable today, just like it was in 2016–and Bernie fully intends to win here again. The difference in Colorado is that this time, we’re a top Super Tuesday primary target, and the current field of candidates offers alternatives to Democratic primary voters that 2016 did not. Can Bernie keep the magic alive for progressives while attracting enough support from unaffiliated primary voters and moderate Democrats to win?
We’ll say this: a crowd like in that photo above makes anything seem possible.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
BY: ParkHill
IN: Easter Weekend Open Thread
BY: SSG_Dan
IN: Easter Weekend Open Thread
BY: kwtree
IN: Coloradans Getting Impatient with Trump Destruction of Public Lands
BY: JohnInDenver
IN: Easter Weekend Open Thread
BY: notaskinnycook
IN: Easter Weekend Open Thread
BY: kwtree
IN: Easter Weekend Open Thread
BY: JohnInDenver
IN: Easter Weekend Open Thread
BY: JohnInDenver
IN: Gabe Evans Tells Frightened Families To Embrace Trump’s “Chaos”
BY: ParkHill
IN: Easter Weekend Open Thread
BY: ParkHill
IN: Easter Weekend Open Thread
Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!
very good event – a great group, great turnout
I saw a lot of t-shirts and stickers for other D candidates and issues.
I met a lot of great people.
No question Bernie got game. If he’s still in come March- he’s going to get a load of Colorado delegates
Enthusiasm is good. Passion is good.
I voted for Sanders last time, but I'm for Warren this time. Her policies are more or less similar to Sanders, but she has put a ton of thought into how to implement them.
Passion vs competence, is how I see it.
I see that.
I am, however, most interested in winning.
I am going to support and vote for the D nominee. Until we have one, I am working for Harris.
That is where platform fights are won and lost. Delegates to the convention…
The establishment wing of the party is committing suicide by trying to unfairly influence the choice of the Democratic voters. Don't the corporatists understand how close to the edge they are pushing this thing?
Americans do not want a return to Feudalism. We want the American Dream returned to us.
Corporations ARE NOT people!
Repeal Citizens United!!
Vote Blue…No Matter Who!!
"… establishment wing of the party is committing suicide by trying to unfairly …"
Same as it ever was.
For the People
IA 49 (10)
NH 33 (4)
SC 63 (22)
NV 48 (21)
(Feb) 193 (57)
March 3 (1358)
CA 495 (200+)
And by March 4 34% of all selected delegates
SuperDelegates don't vote on the first ballot (unless it is uncontested)
Who will do well enough in Feb to have the chance to do really well March 3?
For the People
MADCO, explain your numbers, please. Are these superdelegates vs regular delegates, or ???
No.
Superdelegates don't matter – unless/until there is a second ballot in Milwaukee
Madco speaking in tongues. I recognize some state abbreviations, a month and a month-day. Also some random numbers in parentheses.
Jeezus – If you or one of your kind find the voyager satellite, you would never get it. jic https://youtu.be/BNj2BXW852g
February
Iowa – caucus to state convention, but still able to project delegates
New Hampshire
South Carolina
Nevada
delegates : total and estimated selected/projected for Kamala Harris
March 3
Super Tuesday
I only profiled California – but 34% of all delegates will be selected.
The field will be smaller by February.
And smaller again by March 4.
Leave my satellite out of this!
https://voyager.jpl.nasa.gov/
oooo- just missed
Of course, in space that equates to approximately infinity and beyond.
I heard 10,000 Bernie Bros. Is that right? Size matters to them. 🙂
If you look at the crowd, it’s pretty diverse in gender, ethnicity, and age, probably other invisible factors such as sexual preference, religion, and class.
Most of the Bernie supporters I know are older females.
I’m in the Warren camp, but would happily vote for Bernie if he’s the nominee. He’s opened up people’s minds on what is possible, awakened our collective moral conscience, and his “Our Revolution” has provided financial and logistical support for hundreds of progressive candidates.
And yes, crowd size matters as an indication of popular support and enthusiasm. None of the 2016 candidates, Democratic or Republican, came close to the numbers of people at Bernie’s rallies. In a year when we will badly need that enthusiasm and energy to overcome vote suppression and foreign interference, please don’t be snide about the Bernie supporters.
Trump's crowds were often bigger than Bernie's.
Specific examples?
I know, sorry. I'm just razzing the Bernie people. I will of course support him too if he wins.
But I support Warren all the way.
Is she going to win in California? Hell- Bernie was pretty popular with MA D's in 2016 – is she going to win MA?
I'll support her if she is the nominee. I support her a ton for other roles if she is not – including continued leadership in the US Senate if she desires.
Bernie was pretty popular with MA D's in 2016 – is she going to win MA?
IIRC, the Whore of Wall Street won the Massachusetts primary in 2016.
Clinton 49.7
Sanders 48.3%
other 2%
Why you gotta be that way?
I never would have called her that.
538 had a great article on crowd sizes:
https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/dont-let-crowd-sizes-mislead-you/
In 2016 Bernie had bigger crowds than Hillary yet Hillary won the nomination because in the end more people voted for her even if didn't come to rallies and were active on Facebook. Also she won the majority of the black vote.
Also the process was rigged, which was confirmed by the DNC Chair Donna Brazile.
Altogether now…….
THE SYSTEM IS RIGGED!
Bernie is already crying about that. Again.
Isn’t some kind of rigging an inherent feature of every system? . . .
. . . the opposite of “system” is pretty much always “chaos.”
I’m guessing that Bernie and Ttump have always both scored exactly the same grade of “N” on “Works well and plays well together with others”?
Crying :: Bernie —> it’s what he do!
On the bright side, after he fades out this cycle, he’ll still have a future as a GEICO commercial (. . . so long as he can keep from getting into it with the gecko . . .).
Well- if by some kind you are pointing to things like she did better in voting primaries and most states have voting primaries, you are correct.
If you mean that that the DNC is always by definition going to have their thumb on the scale – I disagree.
There’s some piece of me that wishes Sanders would had found a way to have been the nominee in 2016. That way, after Ttump’s win, we’d all have relegated him to his proper dustbin by now . . .
. . . but then I spose’ we’d just have to watch a septuagenarian Clinton bollocks up 2020 ???
If she had lost the primary, I doubt she would have attempted to come back.
And I do not believe he thinks he is going to be the nominee. I mean… he can't. Right?
You got a better description?
If elected and re-elected Bernie would finish his term at age 87!
What could go wrong.
87 is the new 77.
And 77 is Trump's IQ — on his good days.
And that is why Bernie bores me. If the majority of the country isn't interested in a Democratic Socialist for president, it's because the system is rigged.
Gee, who else spent 2016 whining that the system was rigged?
Bingo, Cookie!
no – it's not rigged cause Bernie lost the nomination, nor because he wouldn't have won the general.
It's rigged because the DNC tipped the scales in real ways toward HRC.
What? People who devoted their lives to the Democratic party actually preferred a devoted Democrat to a former Troytskyite just using their party to advance himself? The monsters!
So the system was only rigged in 2016 but not 2008 when Clinton lost? Convenient explanation, Cow.
2016:
https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2017/11/2/16599036/donna-brazile-hillary-clinton-sanders
https://www.newsweek.com/clinton-robbed-sanders-dnc-brazile-699421
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2017/11/02/sen_warren_yes_the_democratic_presidential_primary_was_rigged_for_hillary_clinton.html
2008: OFA, then called Obama for America, was created as a fundraising and organizing alternative to the DNC, because Obama folks believed Clinton’s controlled the DNC purse strings. OFA was very successful, and went through 2 more iterations of purpose. https://www.influencewatch.org/non-profit/organizing-for-action/
So bottom line is Bernie wasn’t bright enough to follow Obama’s blueprint.
In the old guy’s defense, he probably never heard Obama over all of the yelling? . . .
facts are inconvenient.
And not as much fun as pure MUS.