“Whacktivist” TABOR Diehards Lose Again

Gregory Golyansky.

AP reports via Denver7:

The Colorado Supreme Court has upheld a 20-cent surcharge on grocery bags in the city of Aspen.

Monday’s ruling represents the second time in the last month that the court has rejected a constitutional challenge brought under the Taxpayers’ Bill of Rights. TABOR requires voter approval for all taxes.

The government can raise fees without asking voters as long as the proceeds pay for a related service. Park fees, for instance, can pay for park maintenance.

Here’s the summary of the Colorado Supreme Court’s decision, reaffirming the reasoning that has guided many past decisions interpreting the 1992 Taxpayer’s Bill of Rights (TABOR)–properly interpreting TABOR’s narrowing language to, despite the wishes of the law’s “starve the beast” proponents, allow governments in the state of Colorado to carry out essential functions:

In this case, the supreme court considers whether a $0.20 charge on paper bags is a tax subject to the Taxpayer’s Bill of Rights (“TABOR”). The supreme court holds that if the primary purpose of a charge is to raise revenue for the general expenses of government, then the charge is a tax. Conversely, the supreme court concludes that a charge is not a tax if the primary purpose of a charge is to defray the reasonable direct and indirect costs of providing a service or regulating an activity, because such a charge does not raise revenue for the general expense of government.

After analyzing the charge in this case, the supreme court holds that this charge is not a tax. Aspen imposed this charge as part of a regulatory program aimed at waste management, and the $0.20 charge for the right to use a paper bag bears a reasonable relationship to Aspen’s cost of permitting that use. Because this charge is a not a tax it is exempt from TABOR’s requirements. Accordingly, the supreme court affirms the court of appeals.

The suit was brought by the right-wing advocacy group the Colorado Union of Taxpayers, headed by infamous former gun peddler Gregory Golyansky. The principals at CUT include in addition to Golyansky include Steve Curtis, the former Republican state chairman recently convicted of voter fraud, Dan Kopelman, who ran into scandal selling voter data on the side while working for then-Secretary of State Mike Coffman, and far-right failed state senate candidate Tony Sanchez. Add in Jon Caldara of the Independence Institute and you’ve pretty much got the complete roster of Scooby-Doo villains of Colorado politics.

The well-litigated issue in this case is whether the strict verbiage of TABOR considers purpose-specific fees to be a “tax” requiring voter approval, or whether such fees fall outside the proper scope of the law. The Colorado Supreme Court has consistently found that such fees do not fall within the scope of TABOR, which has led to a the proliferation of such fees as a way to keep essential functions of government operating.

It’s not a perfect solution, but at the end of the day the only people who sue over this are the ones least concerned with a functional government. The most ideological, least responsible voices in Colorado politics. And not only do they always lose, it’s very important that they continue to always lose.

9 Community Comments, Facebook Comments

  1. RepealAndReplace says:

    Apparently paper bags are part of the freedom agenda. Who knew?

  2. Genghis says:

    The Court also gave State Farm a unanimous beat-down in the long-awaited State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Fisher, 2018 CO 39. All in all, a pretty good day for the "magnificent seven."

  3. Diogenesdemar says:

    Golyansky, Kopelman, Curtis, Sanchez, Caldara . . . (and the pustuled zombie ghost of Doug Bruce) . . . 

    . . . nothing really more needs to be said than that.

    . . .

    . . .

    (Still I’m wondering how that crew got all their tin-foil past the court house metal detectors???)

  4. spaceman65 says:

    To be fair, it was a 4-3 decision, including a dissent by the left-leaning Justice Hood, so it's not like the case was a crazy reach.

  5. mamajama55mamajama55 says:

    +10 Pols for "…you’ve pretty much got the complete roster of Scooby-Doo villains of Colorado politics." Nice one.

  6. RepealAndReplace says:

    Is Golyansky the heir apparent to Doug Bruce's TABOR crown? Or should I say tinfoil hat?

  7. MADCO says:

    Colorado Senate Republicans just passed the biggest budget ever. Where's my refund?

  8. Joe ColoradoJoe Colorado says:

    Although my politics are far from Golyansky's, in all fairness to him and the "gun-runner" label being applied, the government was sanctioned for discovery violations in his case and the sanctionability of the government conduct was upheld on appeal (see https://openjurist.org/291/f3d/1245/united-states-v-golyansky ), and the 37 felony counts he faced turned into one misdemeanor charge to which he was sentenced to one day of probation in what was a pretty harsh rebuke to gov't by the judge (http://kgov.com/bel/20100809).

Leave a Reply

Comment from your Facebook account


You may comment with your Colorado Pols account above (click here to register), or via Facebook below.