ThinkProgress spoke with freshman Rep. Scott Tipton (R-CO) at the debate about specific deductions that Congress might take up to pay for Mitt Romney’s massive tax breaks for the wealthy. Tipton cautioned that House Republicans would continue to be “cautious about specifics” because debating individual loopholes or deductions would create “uncertainty” in the marketplace.
“Our specifics will be general in nature,” Tipton said. [Pols emphasis]
Scott Tipton later clarified that, like you, he has no idea what the hell this even means.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
BY: Early Worm
IN: Lauren Boebert’s Romp Through GWU Goes Predictably Awry
BY: harrydoby
IN: Friday Open Thread
BY: Duke Cox
IN: Lauren Boebert’s Romp Through GWU Goes Predictably Awry
BY: MichaelBowman
IN: Lauren Boebert’s Romp Through GWU Goes Predictably Awry
BY: joe_burly
IN: Thursday Open Thread
BY: Meiner49er
IN: Lauren Boebert’s Romp Through GWU Goes Predictably Awry
BY: Chickenheed
IN: Thursday Open Thread
BY: 2Jung2Die
IN: Thursday Open Thread
BY: NOV GOP meltdown
IN: Lauren Boebert’s Romp Through GWU Goes Predictably Awry
BY: Chickenheed
IN: Thursday Open Thread
Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!
go out, it should beamde clear which parts are scripts that should be repeated verbatim, and which prts are stage direction, that are only directive in nature.
I thought it was Obama’s policies that were creating “uncertainty in the workplace.” No?
which are creating uncertainties in the Republican bullshit responses, that are creating uncertainties in the marketplace . . .
Still, any way you look at it — it’s gonna’ be Obama’s fault.