CO-04 (Special Election) See Full Big Line

(R) Greg Lopez

(R) Trisha Calvarese

90%

10%

President (To Win Colorado) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Biden*

(R) Donald Trump

80%

20%↓

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

90%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

90%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(D) Adam Frisch

(R) Jeff Hurd

(R) Ron Hanks

40%

30%

20%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert

(R) Deborah Flora

(R) J. Sonnenberg

30%↑

15%↑

10%↓

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Dave Williams

(R) Jeff Crank

50%↓

50%↑

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

90%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) Brittany Pettersen

85%↑

 

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(R) Gabe Evans

(R) Janak Joshi

60%↑

35%↓

30%↑

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
July 26, 2017 01:45 PM UTC

Gardner Stops Pretending that He's Voting for Coloradans

  • 9 Comments
  • by: Colorado Pols

UPDATE (2:00 pm):

Despite Gardner’s support, the bill failed by a 45-55 margin.

Sen. Cory Gardner can’t hide his true colors anymore.

—–

Cory Gardner isn’t even pretending anymore.

The Republican Senator from Yuma once touted himself as a moderate voice who would always protect the interests of Coloradans in the U.S. Senate, using this carefully-crafted centrist message to unseat Democratic Sen. Mark Udall in 2014. We’ve written plenty of words in this space about “Con Man Cory” and his endless slithering around taking definitive policy positions, but now that the healthcare legislation debate has finally reached the Senate floor, Gardner’s actions and votes have exposed him as nothing more than a partisan yes-man for Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell.

Senate Republicans needed Vice President Mike Pence to cast the tiebreaking vote on Tuesday just to allow them to formally discuss healthcare legislation on the Senate floor. We’re now in the “vote-o-rama” stages of healthcare policy sausage-making, and Gardner is voting “YES” on everything Senate leadership tells him to support — including supporting BCRA legislation with the “Cruz amendment” that would have all completely gutted Medicaid (the proposal failed on the floor Wednesday night, despite Gardner’s support).

As the Denver Post writes, Gardner is still comically evasive in answering questions even as he casts one “YES” vote after another:

After voting with his Republican colleagues Tuesday to begin debate on GOP plans to dismantle the Affordable Care Act, the Colorado lawmaker refused to reveal which of the competing proposals he found most appealing: a straight repeal, some version of the repeal-and-replace bill that Senate Republicans have discussed for weeks or a new idea to remove just a few parts of the ACA, also known as Obamacare…

…The ambiguity is in line with how Gardner has approached the debate overall. For weeks, Gardner has spoken mostly in generalities; one exception was his recent support of per capita caps on Medicaid spending.

On Wednesday morning, 9News aired an interview (we highly recommend watching the entire interview) with Gardner in which the Senator directly contradicted some of his previous comments on healthcare policy. Few politicians are able to make their words more meaningless than Gardner:

Sen. Cory Gardner (R-Colorado) signaled a willingness to repeal the Affordable Care Act without enacting a replacement plan, telling 9NEWS in a Wednesday morning interview that he’d support a plan that put the nation “on a path” to an acceptable replacement for President Obama’s signature healthcare law.

Gardner voted in favor of a repeal-and-replace plan in the Senate, which ultimately failed due to lack of Republican support. Looking forward, he would not rule out other options on the table in the Senate, like repealing the ACA in the hopes of replacing it within the following two years…

…His answers on this point Wednesday morning contrast with what he said earlier this month on conservative radio station KNUS, in which Gardner expressed a preference to replace the healthcare law with a new one during its repeal—suggesting that such a plan could lead to unintended problems.

In his interview with 9News, Gardner refused to commit to preserving Colorado’s expanded Medicaid program, which is used by 1 in 5 Coloradans. You may recall that Gardner promised to protect Medicaid as recently as February, when he signed a letter along with several other Senators pledging to protect the healthcare program.

Gardner is breaking promises on healthcare at such a rapid pace that it’s difficult to even keep up with his contradictions. With that in mind, we thought it would be worthwhile to note some of the few specific answers Gardner has given on healthcare in the past couple of months. Gardner is walking right into a buzzsaw of John Kerry-esque proportions.

[mantra-pullquote align=”center” textalign=”left” width=”90%”]

“We need to make sure the people with pre-existing conditions continue to have coverage and continue to have access to affordable coverage.”

Sen. Cory Gardner (Denver Post, 5/22/17)[/mantra-pullquote]

—–

Gardner interview with Denver7 (6/21/17)

—–

[mantra-pullquote align=”center” textalign=”left” width=”90%”]“While he has called for changes to the process – any vote he takes isn’t on process but is on if the measure is good or bad for Colorado.”

— Gardner spokesperson Casey Contras (Denver Post, 7/25/17)[/mantra-pullquote]

—–

Gardner interview with Denver7 (6/21/17)

 

Gardner interview with Denver7 (6/21/17)

 

Gardner interview with Denver7 (6/21/17)

Comments

9 thoughts on “Gardner Stops Pretending that He’s Voting for Coloradans

  1. Moldy:  Gardner is awesome.   Let the invisible hand of the free market fist you.  We don't try to do what's best for people in Murica Fuck yeah!!! If people get kicked off their insurance for preexisting conditions tough shit.  You deserve to die.

  2. I'm not sure he ever seriously pretended…..

    I mean, he made some vague statements about being concerned about health care and costs, he professed to study Yertle's various discussion drafts, and he signed a letter written by some of his colleagues which vaguely expressed concern for Medicaid recipients, but I don't he was ever committed to voting for Coloradans – unless Charlie and David Koch have taken up residency in this state.

    It's not like he ever gave a "Read My Lips" type speech where he make an unequivocal statement about A.C.A. In fact, I'd be surprised if he ever made an unequivocal statement in his life.

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

192 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!