Notable Links



Denver Internet Marketing by Parallel Path

Arvada Boutique Clothing Store Stella B's

Amendment 48 - Outlaw Abortion

by: DavidThi808

Thu Sep 18, 2008 at 08:40:58 AM MDT


Called by it's proponents the "Definition of a Person" it more accurately should be called the outlawing of abortion proposal.

An amendment to the Colorado constitution to define the term "person" to "include any human being from the moment of fertilization"; and apply this definition of person to the sections of the Colorado Constitution that protect the natural and essential rights of persons, allow open access to courts for every person, and ensure that no person has his or her life, liberty, or property taken away without due process of law.

But what this is in fact is an amendment that would outlaw not just abortion at any point, but even any birth control that occurs after the egg is fertilized such as the morning after pill.

Further info at Colorado Ballot - The misnamed Definition of a Person Initiative

DavidThi808 :: Amendment 48 - Outlaw Abortion
Arguments Against
This will limit the ability of individuals to make private, personal choices about their lives and health. The measure will limit access to abortions and to prohibit medical care, including emergency contraception, commonly used forms of birth control, and treatments for cancer, tubal pregnancies, and infertility. The amendment may restrict some stem cell research that could lead to life-saving therapies for a variety of disabilities and illnesses.

This allows government interference in the doctor-patient relationship and could limit the exercise of independent medical judgment. The measure will restrict a doctor from using certain medical procedures and treatments. Furthermore, the measure will subject medical professionals to legal action for providing medical care to a woman of child-bearing age if it is determined to affect another "person."

Arguments For
The measure may establish the legal foundation to end the practice of abortion in Colorado. The U.S. Supreme Court decision that legalized abortion in the U.S. found that the unborn were not included in the word "person" as used in the U.S. Constitution. If each human life, from the moment of fertilization, is recognized as a person under Colorado's bill of rights, Amendment 48 will provide support for legal challenges to prohibit abortions in Colorado.

Vote NO! Vote No
This is a question that does belong on the ballot (one of the few). But I think this is way more extreme than what the people of this state want. We should have a discussion of what point in the pregnancy we as a people want to say abortion is no longer allowed. And we should put it to a vote. But this proposal should be shot down.

In the meantime, we should all work to make sure abortion is not only safe, but rare. And that must include comprehensive sex-ed in our schools and making birth control available. Regardless of what we do, people will have sex (that's why all of us are here) and while we should impress on our children to be responsible in when they choose to have sex, we also need to stress that they need to be responsible in how they have sex.

And if you believe that as soon as the egg is fertilized, it is a human being and anything that stops it from growing to term is murder, then you should vote for this amendment.

But keep in mind when you do, that the logical interpretation of this amendment is that a woman who takes the morning after pill has committed pre-meditated murder and will be facing a prison term of decades.

Ballotpedia
If you want to make Ballotpedia a more evenhanded discussion of this initiative click here register, and you can then edit the page.

Tags: , , (All Tags)

Share this post:

You should really post the ballot language, but it seem this ammendment is
an abortion of choice rights.

an abortion of choice rights
well put

[ Parent ]
The kid behind this is a totalitarian
Her way or the highway; reminds me of the Obamians.

I'm against.


[ Parent ]
Their way or the highway
reminds me of the Bush doctrine.

[ Parent ]
No
If it were the Bush doctrine, you could be jailed for just thinking about it.

Its just like Further, but with tax cuts! - Fidel's Dirt Nap

[ Parent ]
Huh?
If there's one thing Obama is NOT - almost to a fault - it's a "my way or the highway" kind of guy. I just did a google search of Obama and "my way or the highway" and it came up pretty much empty.

And so, apparently, is your Republican talking point.


"Why not do the right thing for the American people, even though it's not exactly what we want." - Speaker Boehner


[ Parent ]
If you want ballot language on any or all proposals,
go to legislative council page and preview the blue book:

http://www.leg.state.co.us/LCS...


[ Parent ]
The issue of personhood has already been addressed by the Supremes
A Missouri law defined a person as beginning at conception and the Supreme Court declared the law unconstitutional because it was not compatible with Roe.  It will take me forever to find the citation, but I am working on it.

The Republican strategy is not to have Roe overturned because the Court finds that a person existed from conception forward, but rather to overturn it on the issue of states' rights. ..that the Court did not have jurisdiction to rule.  The Republicans and most of their religious allies  do NOT want to vote up or down on abortion...they want the issue to linger so that they can milk it for money and votes, indefinitely.....for that reason alone, I like the guts of this young woman promoting the ballot issue, she is calling their bluff..

My understanding is that if the Amendment passes and Roe is subsequently overturned and the issue turned over to the States, then, and only then, would abortion in Colorado be outlawed.

 For politics, geezers are golden.
by: BlueCat @ Tue Aug 16, 2011 at 19:19:14 PM MDT


When will the Religious Right realize...
...that they are being played for fools by the Republican Party establishment?  The R's don't want this amendment to pass.  They want it on the ballot to try to "get out the vote" of people who will then reflexively vote for R candidates.

If abortion were ever actually outlawed, the R's would lose this as a wedge / GOTV issue.

And, yes, I realize this is a rhetorical question.


Just Say No
I think this should be a clear cut one to reject. I'm not sure I even agree that it is good to vote on when we are willing to allow abortion. That isn't something that should be decided by majority rule, it should be an individual right protected against majority intrusion.

I'm not sure how much impact it would really have if it passed as it would likely face an immediate legal challenge and the court would be able to easily overturn it as unconstitutional, but that wouldn't justify passing it.

"One of the marks of a certain type of bad man is that he cannot give up a thing himself without wanting everyone else to give it up." - C.S. Lewis


I think when to make Abortion is a very valid ballot question
Yes it's a moral choice, and a very very difficult one with no clear answer and everyone having a different opinion.

Yet many of our laws are moral choices including illegal drugs and even no public nudity. And on these questions people differ.

Because it is such a difficult moral choice and because it is so very important to so many people, it by definition is a political decision that should heavily involve the voters of the state.

Where all the cool kids will be on Saturday - Code War!


[ Parent ]
No, you are wrong
It is precisely those moral decisions which should NOT be decided by the voters of the state.  A civil right should never be subject to majority rule.  That is the very essence of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights....see my previous 800 postings on this issue.

 For politics, geezers are golden.
by: BlueCat @ Tue Aug 16, 2011 at 19:19:14 PM MDT


[ Parent ]
Should abortions be legal in the 9th month?
Yes, civil rights should be in the constitution. But they get there via the ballot box.

And for the question of abortion, it's not a yes/no question, it's how far into the pregnacy is it legal. And medical advancements impact that.

This is a question we as a society need to discuss and via the ballot box find the point at which it will be legal. I don't say compromise or consensus because what ever point we do vote in, many will be fundamentally at odds with it.

But I do think we need to determine this via the democratic process.

Where all the cool kids will be on Saturday - Code War!


[ Parent ]
Please tell me you don't believe in the myth of 9th month "convenience" abortions
David, I feel sure you don't really believe that women have abortions in the 9th month just because "they feel like it."  Late abortions only happen in the most tragic of circumstances--and there are only a couple of doctors in the whole country who perform them  for serious reasons.  Would you deny a woman with an aggressive form of cancer life-saving but toxic chemotherapy if she were diagnosed at the beginning of the third trimester of pregnancy?  Do you think it's good public policy to force a couple who learn their baby will be born without a brain to wait until 9 months of gestation is up before the inevitable happens?  Don't get me wrong--I'd never compel the women in these awful situations to have abortions.  But I sure as hell think it's none of the government's business to interfere in these painful, personal family decisions.   And I think you must agree with me in your heart of hearts.

[ Parent ]
No I don't
My point was to bring up exactly what you said - you would support a law that said no abortions in the 9th month except for those extraordinary cases. I agree.

But we're now having to draw a line somewhere because we agree that there is a point at which it is not ok, depending on the situation. And that's not for you or me or a court to hand down - that's for us as a society to work out.

Where all the cool kids will be on Saturday - Code War!


[ Parent ]
I dont think he said that
In fact, he said:

But I sure as hell think it's none of the government's business to interfere in these painful, personal family decisions.

Sounds to me like he does not think a law should be passed, and I totally agree with him. As progressive promoter points out these instances are rare and used out of necessity. Adding a layer of bureacracy should be antithetical to anyone who thinks the right to your own body with out government intervention is absolute.  


[ Parent ]
Define democratic process
If you mean the process to amend the federal constitution, I could not agree more.  It would be within the framework of legislative debate on the amendment where such discussions should occur. There are no amendments, either pro-life or pro-choice, introduced in Congress. The amendment process is decided by legislative vote, the people's representatives vote.  It is not a direct ballot issue.

If you mean that every state should decide the issue for itself, then I disagree.  Right now, the right to obtain an abortion in the first trimester are uniform across the fifty states because the right is secured by the Roe decision of the Supreme Court. It is a civil right. I disagree with the states' rights argument because it would eliminate an individual civil right and turn it into a matter of states rights.

Not all civil rights come from the ballot; some come from Supreme Court decisions.  For example, Miranda and the right to an attorney in criminal cases are uniform civil rights across the fifty state and derive from a Supreme Court decision.  The right to obtain prescription contraceptives is uniform across the fifty states and comes from a famous Supreme Court decision. Interracial marriage or the right to marry someone, regardless of that person's race, ethnic background or religion, is a uniform across the fifty states and comes from a Supreme Court decision...  Anyone who thinks that that particular right could be secured by the ballot is blessed to have little or no contact with old white people, mainly from the South....

I think that if one could offer proof of having watched  Law and Order for ten years, including reruns, one should be awarded a law degree.  EVen if only for the purposes of this blog...I do NOT want to start another inane discussion of what is in the federal Constitution and what is not...please.



 For politics, geezers are golden.
by: BlueCat @ Tue Aug 16, 2011 at 19:19:14 PM MDT


[ Parent ]
Clarification
There are no amendments currently introduced in the United States Congress on this issue.  But, the United States Congress is one place where such an amendment process could begin.

 For politics, geezers are golden.
by: BlueCat @ Tue Aug 16, 2011 at 19:19:14 PM MDT


[ Parent ]
About Roe v Wade
While I think abortion should be legal (and rare), I also think Roe v Wade should be overturned and the decision settled in the legislative process (state or federal).

My reasoning is at Overturn Roe v Wade

Where all the cool kids will be on Saturday - Code War!


[ Parent ]
We must agree to disagree


 For politics, geezers are golden.
by: BlueCat @ Tue Aug 16, 2011 at 19:19:14 PM MDT


[ Parent ]
Civil rights and legislating for the heck of it
Gotta echo Dwyer here: For some people, interracial marriage is an immoral decision.  For some people, using birth control is morally incorrect.  These are civil rights secured through Supreme Court decisions, just as Roe established for women to have control over their own lives.

For that matter, there are racists who believe African-Americans should be second-class citizens because of  hideous notions of "moral inferiority."   Just because there are people who view it as a moral issue doesn't mean it should be a political decision.  

Furthermore, isn't legislating a ban on later abortions a solution looking for a problem?  In theory, it's fine with me that Roe articulates a ban on 3rd trimester abortions with exceptions for life and health of the mother.  But nobody in their right mind would have a 9th month abortion unless there was a huge problem--it's an expensive, complicated procedure that most have to fly across the country for.  Since it's not happening, what's the point of passing laws governing it?  

I agree these are difficult decisions.  Never having been confronted with these choices, I've never occupied where the rubber meets the road, so to speak.  But if I were, I think I'd want to weigh the options privately with my close family and our doctor, and not have to worry about the legal implications of those choices.


[ Parent ]
Get out the fundie vote
would be a better definition of the initiative.

The only purpose of this initiative is to excite those who celebrate Sarah Palin's unwed pregnant teenage daughter as a model of sexual behavior because she "chose" to stay pregnant.  It would take a whip to get them to the polls if the initiative was about protecting and educating our daughters so that they could grow up to become women before they became mothers.  It's a garbage amendment and it's supporters are cynical anti-women frauds.


NO on 48
It's obvious. Even Bob Schaffer is against it.

is he actually opposing it?
I thought he was simply waffling on taking a stand.

[ Parent ]
He opposes it
From the Rocky Mountain News

[Schaffer] pointed out in his radio interview that Colorado's three Catholic bishops also don't support Amendment 48.

"I think there are other strategies and tactics that get us far closer to advancing the cause of human life," Schaffer said.



[ Parent ]
This one's a no-brainer...
It would outlaw many forms of contraception as well as abortion to save the life of the mother.  This is a position only the most radical anti-choice activists can be comfortable with.

If you believe that abortion to save the life of the mother is the right moral choice, vote No on 48.

"We're below sharks and contract killers." -- Rep. Trey Gowdy (R-S.C.), speaking on Congress's 9% approval rating


They're so crazy PR
they support an amendment that would kill mothers. They like fetuses more than adult people!

[ Parent ]
Just trying to increase the margin of defeat!
Of course, with Libertad, Bondo and Another Skeptic chiming in as conservative voices against the amendment already here, it may be that it's already going down in flames.

"We're below sharks and contract killers." -- Rep. Trey Gowdy (R-S.C.), speaking on Congress's 9% approval rating

[ Parent ]
I love bi-partisanship
especially when it's against something as stupid as this.

[ Parent ]
Reminds me...
of a poll I once saw:

When does life begin:

1) When sperm meets egg
2) Point at which the fetus can live outside the womb
3) Moment of Birth
4) At age 40

The age 40 response won overwhelmingly....

"But when I see a 9-11 victim family on television, or whatever, I'm just like, 'Oh, shut up!' I'm so sick of them because they're always complaining."  Glenn Beck  


It's really just an attempt to
push the decision to the Supremes and get Roe v Wade overturned. The silly little twit who supposedly is the one responsible for this may be sincere but, if she  really doesn't, everyone else knows it's far too broad with far too many bizarre potential consequences to survive five minutes without challenges that will send it through the court system.  

I wonder if the backers are also praying for McSame to win and a non-far right justice or two to die really soon.  I wonder if they expect better luck than they had with that deluge of biblical proportions that failed to materialize for Obama's acceptance speech. Let's make it a moot point by voting 'No".  


Question
You call McCain, "McSame".
Does that mean I can again call Obama, "Hussein"?
I mean fair play and all, it is his god given name. Right?

McSame is really just a jab at a war hero.

NoBama .... NoBamaCare either


[ Parent ]
Wow
Don't know which non-sequitur to start with here. What anything you said, Gecko, has to do with ANYTHING being discussed here is beyond me.  Guess you've really got nothing, huh?

[ Parent ]
Gecko's middle name is "Non Sequitur"


[ Parent ]
I think you are confused.
If Bluecat were calling him "Sidney" why then yes--you should, by all means, also call Obama by his middle name.

McSame (I'll just pretend you don't understand and explain this to you) is used to link McCain to Bush, since he has voted with him 90% of the time during the Bush administration. Not a maverick. Just more of the same.

A war jab would go something like this (just for compare and contrast purposes):

"Wow, McCain couldn't fly a plane for shit which explains why he got his ass shot down. Talk about an incompetent dumbass."

Now, that would be a jab at a war hero.

See how that works?

Glad I could be here for ya, buddy.  

"I wouldn't characterize caloric intake as "professional development." c rork


[ Parent ]
So war heroes are immune from criticism?


"Thank you for putting your rank political motives on display." - ArapaGOP

[ Parent ]
No McSame is a jab at
someone who sold out whatever integrity he had to win a prize, embracing the man and the policies he once disdained.  It has noting, nothing, nothing to do with his service.  And I suspect that you know that, but having nothing else of value to point to, its all you can embrace about John Sidney McSame.

"There are a lot of reasons not to elect me." Mitt Romney in a moment of clarity

"I'm Mitt Romney and yes, Wolf, that's also my first name," Willard Mitt Romney demonstrating 'policy flexibility.'  


[ Parent ]
Every Sperm is Sacred
Couldn't resist!



I'm afraid I'll have to sell the lot of you into slavery...


"There are a lot of reasons not to elect me." Mitt Romney in a moment of clarity

"I'm Mitt Romney and yes, Wolf, that's also my first name," Willard Mitt Romney demonstrating 'policy flexibility.'  


[ Parent ]
This isn't nearly as fun as yesterday.
Bad piece of potential law anyway you look at it.

Now, if only...
Just to inquire, since we've got a lot of new seeming conservatives here...

Are any of you in general anti-abortion with exceptions?  And if so, does the absurdity of this bill change your opinion of how abortions are provided (i.e. not done as a normal hospital procedure but exiled to clinics...)?

"We're below sharks and contract killers." -- Rep. Trey Gowdy (R-S.C.), speaking on Congress's 9% approval rating


[ Parent ]
Take some advice from Nancy Reagan
Just say, "NO!" to Amendment 48 - the only state in the union to propose an assault on women. This too extreme.

Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?







Advertise Here!
ads@coloradopols.com


Active Users
Currently 14 user(s) logged on.

Search




Advanced Search



Colorado Pols Network


Jeffco Pols
  More >

Denver Pols
  More >













RSS 2.0



Pols Gets Mobile: ColoradoPols.com/mobile/

Colorado Pols is on Twitter: twitter.com/coloradopols

Email Pols


How to Write a Diary That Will Make the Front Page



Terms of Use/Privacy Policy



Pols Posting Policies



The Pols Penalty Box



Yard Signs!



The Pols "Mailbag"

Mailbag #1



Relevant Links

The Big Media Blog

Blog It Right

Blog For Growth

Blogometer

Business Word

Colorado Capitol Journal

Colorado Center on Law and Policy

Colorado Democratic Party

Colorado Ethics Watch

Colorado Independent

Colorado Labor Blog

Colorado Veterans for America

Colorado Legislature

Colorado Lib

Colorado Libertarian Blog

Colorado Media Matters

Colorado Progressive Coalition

Colorado Republican Party

Colorado Secretary of State

Colorado Senate Dems

Colorado Senate GOP

Colorado Young Democrats

Commentary Today

Coyote Gulch

CU Democrats

Curious Stranger

Daily Kos

Dan Willis-Rumors

Dem Notes

Democracy for Colorado

Denver Politics

East Boulder County Politics

Ed Stein Ink

Election Neutrality Now

eleXn

George in Denver

Great Education Colorado

Head First Colorado

The Hotline Political Network

Junction Daily Blog

Left in the West

Liberal and Loving It

Maintain Educational Standards in Colorado

Mount Virtus

MyDD

National Journal

On Call

Peak Dems

Political State Report

Progress Now

Prometheus

Project Vote Smart

Radio Free Denver

Senate Guru

Slapstick Politics

Steam Powered Opinions

Square State

Stygius

TalkLeft

The Thicket

The Bell Policy Center

The Hypothetical Wren

ThomasMC.com

Toilet Paper Online

TRACER Campaign Finance

View From a Height

Walter in Denver

Wash Park Prophet

Western Democrat


Colorado Pols is wholly owned by Colorado Pols, LLC
webmaster-at-coloradopols.com

Powered by: SoapBlox