FOX 31’s Julie Hayden:
The Denver District Attorney’s Office has decided not to pursue charges against Colorado State Rep. Laura Bradford for allegedly possessing a firearm while intoxicated.
DA spokeswoman Lynn Kimbrough told FOX31 Denver Monday afternoon that prosecutors looked at the “totality of the evidence” and determined they could not prove the case beyond a reasonable doubt.
DUI charges have also been ruled out…
It’s pretty simple–since Rep. Laura Bradford was never subjected to testing needed to prove in court she was legally drunk behind the wheel a week and a half ago when pulled over by Denver Police, she can’t be charged with driving under the influence of alcohol. And since it would be necessary to establish that Rep. Bradford was intoxicated in order for her 9mm pistol in the car to be unlawful, there’s really no way to charge her with that, either.
In both cases, these are outcomes that would not have been but for the immunity legislators enjoy from misdemeanor arrest during the session. This immunity was foisted on an unwilling Rep. Bradford, as the story from Denver Police has been changed to say now. The original version of the story as told by the responding DPD supervisor, officially retracted but the investigation of which is not complete, is that Rep. Bradford slyly invoked it herself. We have not heard from that supervisor, Sgt. Benita Packard, to know anything more about her version of the story.
With DPD’s Internal Affairs division reportedly investigating, we doubt we will anytime soon.
Because there remain far more unknowns that knowns in this situation, House Speaker Frank McNulty, we’d say appropriately, convened an ethics committee to try to sort out what happened after a reported “lobbyist happy hour” at Prohibition, an East 17th Ave bar, on the night of January 25th. It’s possible there will be much revealed about the incident by this committee–perhaps who the lobbyists were, other legislators, and as Charles Ashby of the Grand Junction Sentinel tantalizingly added this weekend, “even members of the media” who may have been present. We’ve also heard questions about Rep. Bradford’s actions immediately after police “lit up” her vehicle, and where she may have driven before coming to a stop.
The ethics committee also appears to be taking its time, which is good for Frank McNulty since Bradford has promised (as of last Friday anyway) to see the process through before doing anything, you know, crazy–like decapitating the House GOP leadership. That’s a considerable change from last Thursday, when her rhetoric was quite a bit more bellicose. If the committee formally clears her, then we’ll know if Bradford is genuinely angry at leadership for failing to stick by her, or if that was an affectation to gain leverage. If the committee finds something else incriminating? Perhaps the first indicator will be Rep. Bradford flying off the handle again…
Bottom line: things may settle down, but we wouldn’t “oh well” the case of Rep. Bradford’s traffic stop away like the Denver Players’ disappearing black book quite yet. The reason it’s not over is a Republican, out of personal spite or perhaps even good sense, is still asking questions.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
BY: JohnInDenver
IN: Wednesday Open Thread
BY: MichaelBowman
IN: Get More Smarter on Wednesday (March 27)
BY: Duke Cox
IN: Get More Smarter on Wednesday (March 27)
BY: MichaelBowman
IN: Get More Smarter on Wednesday (March 27)
BY: MichaelBowman
IN: Get More Smarter on Wednesday (March 27)
BY: 2Jung2Die
IN: Wednesday Open Thread
BY: MichaelBowman
IN: Now Trump’s Selling For-Profit Bibles
BY: MichaelBowman
IN: Now Trump’s Selling For-Profit Bibles
BY: spaceman2021
IN: Get More Smarter on Wednesday (March 27)
BY: Lauren Boebert is a Worthless POS
IN: Wednesday Open Thread
Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!
1. Welcome Laura to the D party.
2. Take control of the House.
3. Make her chair of the “Ethics” Committee.
Winner take all.
1. Laura is happy.
2. The Dems ramrod through boatloads of bills.
3. Repubs call for their “brown pants”.
Never, ever.
All politicians are whores.
It is only a matter of how much the Dems are willing to pay.
Politics is PERCEPTION
If we, as Democrats, openly welcomed and encouraged Laura to join (enticing her with Committee Chairs, etc), it would look like we’re valuing power over convictions (which is WRONG and the voters would demonstrate their anger against us in subsequent elections)
If Laura Bradford wants to jump into Democratic Waters, she is more than welcome and we’d love to have her – but we should NOT make any special offers to entice – that is wrong and the voters will punish us for it
I’m proud of Rick Palacio and our other Democrats for handling this so well – well done!
You assume someone who caused headaches for her old party and ditched them would be a docile, cooperative member of her new party. Support for that assumption?
Control of committees would be huge. But counting on her vote, not so sure.
Laura will vote those ultra conservative views of hers no matter what letter she has behind her name.
The New Republican Party ® sees an opportunity to rid itself of another woman and return the purity of white males to the roster.
In other words, did someone alert the police that she was driving and had been drinking?
As for the gun in the glove department: as my old Irish mom would say – “tell the truth and shame the devil.” How many Colorado women who have to drive, solo, I 70 to the Western Slope have a gun in the glove department?
who are late for a “legislative function” at the Broken Wheel bar. Get out of her way.
was under the driver’s seat
at least according to the Toast.
via 7News:
She really said that?
Now that’s chutzpah!
Tequila!
“Three glasses of wine”
I always lose count after two?!? (Especially if someone else is buying.)