(D) J. Hickenlooper*
(R) Janak Joshi
80%
20%
(D) Jena Griswold
(D) M. Dougherty
(D) Hetal Doshi
50%
40%↓
30%
(D) Jeff Bridges
(D) Brianna Titone
(R) Kevin Grantham
50%↑
40%↓
30%
(D) Diana DeGette*
(D) Wanda James
(D) Milat Kiros
80%
20%
10%↓
(D) Joe Neguse*
(R) Somebody
90%
2%
(R) Jeff Hurd*
(D) Alex Kelloff
(R) H. Scheppelman
60%↓
40%↓
30%↑
(R) Lauren Boebert*
(D) E. Laubacher
(D) Trisha Calvarese
90%
30%↑
20%
(R) Jeff Crank*
(D) Jessica Killin
60%↓
40%↑
(D) Jason Crow*
(R) Somebody
90%
2%
(D) B. Pettersen*
(R) Somebody
90%
2%
(R) Gabe Evans*
(D) Shannon Bird
(D) Manny Rutinel
45%↓
30%
30%
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
80%
20%
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
95%
5%
(I’ve always believed DOMA was in violation of the U.S. Constitution’s full faith and credit clause. This decision — coupled with the trial chyallenging California’s anti-gay marriage referendum — could have a major impact on constitutional law in this field. – promoted by Voyageur)
Look for gay marriage to be moved up the list of “hot political issues” for elections in November.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/38…
This ruling affects only if the Federal Government is required to recognize marriages performed in the 5 states and DC that permit marriages between individuals of the same sex. The judge ruled that everyone, including gays and lesbians, is entitled to equal protection under the law.
Coming on the heels of Governor Lingle’s veto of Hawaii’s proposed domestic partnership law, this is another example of gay civil rights taking a step forward as it takes a step backwards.
Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!
Comments