Notable Links



Denver Internet Marketing by Parallel Path

Arvada Boutique Clothing Store Stella B's

GOP State House Candidates--Slow Fizzle Begins?

by: Colorado Pols

Tue Jun 22, 2010 at 08:18:08 AM MDT


It's not a secret--well, not a very well-kept secret, anyway--that the Colorado Republican Party has singled out the state House as their primary electoral focus this year. We've heard rumors of over $4 million committed to GOP efforts to retake the House, and that candidate recruitment efforts have gone (their opinion) quite well.

On the other hand, we're beginning to hear stories about serious problems emerging with a number of GOP House contenders: stuff that might have given recruiters pause had they fully vetted their picks, from the mundane and circumstantial to things you'll be talking about for some time--seriously. Over the next few weeks, we'll try to profile some of these more interesting races and candidates.

For today, though, we can start with the Fort Collins Coloradoan, and their report on what was once considered a prime pickup opportunity for the GOP, the seat held by Rep. John Kefalas:

Larimer County Republicans designated Fort Collins City Council member Aislinn Kottwitz this spring as their candidate to challenge Democratic state Rep. John Kefalas.

But it's not at all clear that Kottwitz will actually run for the seat.

She was the sole candidate designated for the primary ballot at the House District 52 Republican Assembly. But since filing her candidate affidavit in late April, she's done nothing - Kottwitz hasn't raised any money and hasn't even filed the paperwork that would allow her to do so...

Now the story from local Republicans is that Aislinn Kottwitz is expecting, and as a result hasn't decided whether to commit to her nomination. That may be true, but Kottwitz' performance on the Fort Collins City Council hasn't been much more reliable: appointed to the Poudre Fire Authority Board last year, Kottwitz has missed four of the last seven meetings through April 2010 according to board records. She has missed numerous important votes on issues before the PFA and the City Council, including--wait for it--a vote on a resolution on "the importance of punctuality."

Do part-time elected officials lead busy lives? Sure. Should you nevertheless consider your ability to keep commitments you make before making them? Uh, yes. Yes you should.

It's not too late for Republicans to find another candidate, of course, but they'll be playing catchup at this point to Kefalas' $37,000 in the bank. That's why, when you go through all the time and trouble to recruit somebody for a hot legislative race, you check for evidence of flakiness.

Colorado Pols :: GOP State House Candidates--Slow Fizzle Begins?
Tags: (All Tags)

Share this post:

Ah don't worry about Kefalas
That districts' 2008 performance was likely 70-80%.

Its tough for some of you to deal with Christian pro-lifers like Palin and Kefalas.

It is impossible to know what Palin and Kefalas really believe about God, but having been raised in conservative churches, they are fluent in church language, doctrine and culture.

All politics is local and with the GOP organizing in home and church basements maybe you should be concerned about Ms Kottwitz. It would be interesting to she what positive leadership she's provided to the local residents.

I'm sure you can find many more spin opportunities, but the Christian soldiers marching to the ballot box just might pull the Kottwitz lever in response to the Obama inspired and corporate bailout backed Kafalas.


You're kind of missing the point here, Libertad
Kottwitz can't win the election if she doesn't actually run.

[ Parent ]
Just like the Dem US Senate nominee in SC ;)


[ Parent ]
Kefalas is pro-choice...
what are you smoking (do you have a script for it?) and what does Palin have to do with this?  Is Kottwitz single and pregnant?  That would be a possible Palin tie-in....other than that, I'm at a loss...

"But when I see a 9-11 victim family on television, or whatever, I'm just like, 'Oh, shut up!' I'm so sick of them because they're always complaining."  Glenn Beck  

[ Parent ]
As the prior two comments show...
... L's comment here is unusually stupid, even by his own low standards. Care to explain WTF you're talking about, L?

AraraGOP said Romney will win the nomination and "I don't see how he can survive the next year of withering attacks."

[ Parent ]
More Libertad Non Sequitur Action
Holy cow.......

Huh?  

"Politics determines who has the power, not who has the truth." Paul Krugman, 9/2010


[ Parent ]
Crackpot Conti and now this
Joe Rice's opponent is theorizing about terrorist treehouses out in the woods, and this candidate can't even show up for the job she does have?  

Wow, Larimer County's next major player
is fading faster than I can type her name. I remember when Kottwitz ran for Ft Collins City Council last year and was supposed to be a rising star in the party, clearly being positioned to move up to take on Kefalas in HD52. I love her response to the Coloradoan's request for confirmation on her running for office or not.

"I will make sure you are informed when either decision I make is formalized," Kottwitz said in response to a Coloradoan question about whether she planned to run in the fall.

Uh, somebody needs to let Mrs. Kottwitz know that the election is in four months, not four years. She might want to get to thinking about that a little harder.  

"I wouldn't characterize caloric intake as "professional development." c rork


This is part of a growing misconception
among the national media, and by extension people who watch the national media. A narrative has been written that the tea party candidate will automatically win in November against an incumbent because national polling shows anti-incumbent sentiment, anger with the way things are going, and the usual cyclical win for the party not currently in the White House.

Unfortunately for those bird's-eye-view prognosticators, they have managed to ignore one of the most important phrases (probably a cliche at this point) in electoral politics, and that is the fact that all politics is local. Here's how I apply that to the 2010 midterm elections:

1. You can't just run anybody against anybody and think that if they have the quality of not being the incumbent they will automatically win.

2. You have to run quality candidates against quality candidates. If you run a crappy candidate against someone who is even remotely good at their job, then you lower your chances of winning that particular race demonstrably.

3. You can't just run a "Tea Party" candidate in this climate and expect them to win automatically. Voters might be angry, but they're not going to vote for someone who says things that are in direct conflict with the values that the voters in a particular district hold (it's why I've been so confused by people falling all over themselves to be called tea partiers. That might work in the GOP US Senate primary but it's not going to work in a state house race where people are less concerned about ideology than whether or not the person knows about the issues that affect them.)

4. You certainly can't expect to win without running an all-out, 100% committed campaign.

Of course, I'm not really any smarter than the national prognosticators. My local prognostication might turn out to be completely wrong, but somehow I don't think so.

Bottom line: this might be a weird political year, but the basic rules of campaigning still apply. You can't ignore them and expect to win by default.


RSB you hit the nail squarely on the head
Voters aren't stupid and in the end they do consider the candidates and neither party can just run anybody. The voters have a sixth sense about who is and isn't a good politician.

[ Parent ]
Short version:
Voters might be angry, but they're not stupid.

[ Parent ]
I disagree
For evidence I offer: The presidential election of 2004.  Also, electing reps and senators that have ideologies that only hurt the ordinary voter and favor our overlords, the corporations.  

"Politics determines who has the power, not who has the truth." Paul Krugman, 9/2010

[ Parent ]
I really thought that as well
then Alvin Greene happened.

WHT happened there?  Every interview I have seen has people admitting they "knew" people who voted for him and had no idea who he was.

Colorado, one of the lowest taxed states in one of the lowest taxed nations in the developed world.


[ Parent ]
Alvin Greene was selected
at the party level as the Democratic nominee in that race. He's actually the perfect example, and not an exception. He's just the Democratic counterexample to the numerous GOP/tea party examples.

[ Parent ]
So here's the deal on that one.
I live in the next district over (west side of Fort Collins) and was at the county assembly. Nobody had decided to run yet at the assembly, and a lot of people wanted Ray Martinez to run. He declined however, and my (libertarian) friend in the CSU math department (grad student) made a good speech and was considering running. If he had run, I think he could have had a chance at winning as he would have had a significant portion of the college vote - he's a popular guy with students. However, he realized that it just wasn't possible to do that with what he wanted to do in grad school, so he bowed out. The GOP however is trying to run someone in every district similar to what Dems did the last cycle, so they can pick up a few seats on fluke elections. Do I think she has any chance against Kefalas? No. But there are five months left to go before the election and I'm glad the GOP has someone on the ballot just in case.

"...energy shouldn't be in the market." - Aristotle

That's an interesting perspecive
I think it has some merit IF the candidate actually campaigns. I'm sure a certain fraction of voters always vote against the incumbent, particularly so this year. But, to quote RSB above:

4. You certainly can't expect to win without running an all-out, 100% committed campaign.


Its just like Further, but with tax cuts! - Fidel's Dirt Nap

[ Parent ]
Basically just looking at the off chance of a major scandal or deal-breaker I guess.


"...energy shouldn't be in the market." - Aristotle

[ Parent ]
Alvin Greene of SC proves otherwise.......


"Politics determines who has the power, not who has the truth." Paul Krugman, 9/2010

[ Parent ]
Again, see above
If Alvin Greene wins the general election, then I'll say you were right, but he's not going to. He's a perfect example of this. I wasn't talking about internal party politics, just general election races.

[ Parent ]
you know better
Nobody cares about these races. It is a GOP year, we could nominate Mickey Mouse and get Rep. Mouse. You know it.

Way to pick on a working mother too.


WTF?
What does her being a working mother have to do with it?  If you're suggesting that working moms can't be expected to show up for a majority of meetings they're scheduled to attend, or to put in effort to procure a serious job they've applied for, then no: I know a zillion working moms who (a) don't flake out on a majority of meetings they're supposed to attend, and (b) don't flake out on putting in effort to apply for an important job.

BTW, "warrior": any more hot intel on whom Sarah Palin is going to endorse?

AraraGOP said Romney will win the nomination and "I don't see how he can survive the next year of withering attacks."


[ Parent ]
Can she be a "working" mother
If she doesn't show up at work?

Where all the cool kids will be on Saturday - Code War!

[ Parent ]
Another uber-rightie non sequitar
Actually, you might be partially correct.  It's obvious that a lot of Republican legislators have DNA in common with Mickey Mouse.  

"Politics determines who has the power, not who has the truth." Paul Krugman, 9/2010

[ Parent ]
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?







Advertise Here!
ads@coloradopols.com


Active Users
Currently 4 user(s) logged on.

Search




Advanced Search



Colorado Pols Network


Jeffco Pols
  More >

Denver Pols
  More >













RSS 2.0



Pols Gets Mobile: ColoradoPols.com/mobile/

Colorado Pols is on Twitter: twitter.com/coloradopols

Email Pols


How to Write a Diary That Will Make the Front Page



Terms of Use/Privacy Policy



Pols Posting Policies



The Pols Penalty Box



Yard Signs!



The Pols "Mailbag"

Mailbag #1



Relevant Links

The Big Media Blog

Blog It Right

Blog For Growth

Blogometer

Business Word

Colorado Capitol Journal

Colorado Center on Law and Policy

Colorado Democratic Party

Colorado Ethics Watch

Colorado Independent

Colorado Labor Blog

Colorado Veterans for America

Colorado Legislature

Colorado Lib

Colorado Libertarian Blog

Colorado Media Matters

Colorado Progressive Coalition

Colorado Republican Party

Colorado Secretary of State

Colorado Senate Dems

Colorado Senate GOP

Colorado Young Democrats

Commentary Today

Coyote Gulch

CU Democrats

Curious Stranger

Daily Kos

Dan Willis-Rumors

Dem Notes

Democracy for Colorado

Denver Politics

East Boulder County Politics

Ed Stein Ink

Election Neutrality Now

eleXn

George in Denver

Great Education Colorado

Head First Colorado

The Hotline Political Network

Junction Daily Blog

Left in the West

Liberal and Loving It

Maintain Educational Standards in Colorado

Mount Virtus

MyDD

National Journal

On Call

Peak Dems

Political State Report

Progress Now

Prometheus

Project Vote Smart

Radio Free Denver

Senate Guru

Slapstick Politics

Steam Powered Opinions

Square State

Stygius

TalkLeft

The Thicket

The Bell Policy Center

The Hypothetical Wren

ThomasMC.com

Toilet Paper Online

TRACER Campaign Finance

View From a Height

Walter in Denver

Wash Park Prophet

Western Democrat


Colorado Pols is wholly owned by Colorado Pols, LLC
webmaster-at-coloradopols.com

Powered by: SoapBlox