Notable Links



Denver Internet Marketing by Parallel Path

Knowledge Messenger

Arvada Boutique Clothing Store Stella B's

Repeal TABOR, Says New GOP Poll

by: Colorado Pols

Thu Sep 24, 2009 at 14:49:36 PM MDT


A new poll released by the GOP-leaning Tarrance Group has generally unsurprising numbers: a slight plurality of respondents approve of Governor Bill Ritter's job performance, but an ominous majority are also ready for a "new person" in the office. GOP gubernatorial candidate Scott McInnis continues to own Josh Penry in terms of name recognition, the only thing really measurable this early in the game. Sen. Michael Bennet has a comfortable lead over primary challenger Andrew Romanoff, and Jane Norton is similarly out in front of GOP Senate candidate Ken Buck. Here's the memo on the results--check it out for yourself, with the same grain of salt we've consistently recommended for these early guessing-game polls.

One notable though, if you read down into questions about Colorado policy proposals, you find that 55% of respondents--and a surprising 61% in the Colorado Springs area--think that the Taxpayer's Bill of Rights (TABOR) should be repealed. Of course the same respondents also say that fee increases (think vehicle registrations) should be voted on, so maybe it's a case of what they last heard about on the radio. And maybe in the Springs, they just know Doug Bruce well enough to oppose anything connected to him on general principles--or perhaps they're just tired of seeing their county fall apart because of endless spending and tax cuts?

Either way, kind of interesting.

Colorado Pols :: Repeal TABOR, Says New GOP Poll
Tags: (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Repeal TABOR vs. voting on fee increases
I think the poll shows something more interesting. It is showing that voters are now realizing TABOR is a largely responsible for the state's constitutional crisis. (note: I said largely and not solely)

However, they also want to keep the part that was sold to voters in 1992: public vote on tax/fee increases.


Your comments are in line with what we've always said about TABOR
In THEORY, it makes sense. But TABOR doesn't actually work in a manner that isn't crippling to the state. The sad story of what has happened in El Paso County says it all.

[ Parent ]
But 68% want to vote on any fee increases
Clearly voters like their approval on taxes and fees> I think the support for repealing Tabor is likely due to the other pieces of it.

I actually thought Romanoff only down by 12 points was good considering he just got in.


[ Parent ]
The point was voters are now starting to get it
It has taken a few years for what the political wonks know to really sink in with the masses.

[ Parent ]
And the fact that increasing numbers of voters are "getting" it about TABOR
makes it that much more important that a well-crafted issue regarding Colorado's Constitutional fiscal mess be on the ballot in 2010.

[ Parent ]
Bad News for Speaker Romanoff
The poll has Bennet beating Romanoff 41% to 27%.  

This is not good news for any candidate scrambling to raise money. A good number to look for is who raised the most in contributions from September 16 when Romanoff announced to October 1.  


Down 14 points
That's gotta hurt.  

"It is hard enough to remember my opinions, without also remembering my reasons for them!" - Nietzsche  

[ Parent ]
I wish...
...that Bruce had failed and something more supportive of representative democracy had been implemented.

Something like, "No tax increase shall take effect until approved by two successive Legislatures" - so you always have an election between when a tax is first approved and the approval which puts it in action.  This gives people a chance to "vote the bums out!" if they want, and yet gives elected officials the opportunity to actually lead (with accountability).  And it de-clutters the ballot.

That, and I wish I had a pony.


Likewise
I like your idea.  

My own is a limit on the size of government as a percentage of gross state income so that taxes can be changed quickly within the limits. Raise a tax or fee on one thing and lower it on something else. The limit could only be raised by either a super majority or a majority twice with the votes two or four years apart.

That, and I wish I had a Honda Insight.

Matthew


[ Parent ]
and a surprising 61% in the Colorado Springs area--think that the Taxpayer's Bill of Rights (TABOR) should be repealed
Those who know Doug Bruce best like his brain fart of an idea least.

The untold story about TABOR
is how it has helped facilitate turning Colorado from red to a blue state.  R's no longer have that worn out battle axe of "they are taxing us too much" to use against Democrats, although they do try with fee increases.   The opposite is even true, in that you see sane R's, like Owens, (as opposed to self-serving special interest shills like Penry) understanding that TABOR creates big problems for our state and propose patchwork fixes like Ref C., which flimflam man Penry also opposed.  

I believe I'm in the "Constitutional Convention" camp now as the surest way to address out conflicting laws and economic woes.  


Should we start a new Party?
the Constitutional Convention Party.


[ Parent ]
Ummmm
The "Colorado Policy Institute"'s media contact is Sean Tonner - Jane Norton and Scott McInnis's G.C., and the Facebook release was sent out by Monica Owens.

Have they completely lost their minds t try this? Trailhead got the Repubs in enough trouble but at least John Marshall didn't have the audacity to chair the group at the same time he was managing Beauprez.


Yeah, John Marshall is a smart guy, I guess.
At least in your opinion.

Whether his candidate won or lost, he managed to get himself a cushy job working for Tim Foster at Mesa State.  Success at your assigned job doesn't appear to matter.  You are who you know.

Are you saying he's smart?  Because I'm saying he's just well connected.

Best to kill them early instead of letting them possibly need food stamps.
--marilou, 2010


[ Parent ]
Huh?
Saying "at least he wasn't stupid enough to do this" was not an endorsement of his intelligence.

[ Parent ]
The ratchet
To vote on fee increases was just white wash.  Bruce meant to cripple government with the small print.  And he did.  Hard to believe we fell for it.  Our kids will suffer for many years.

Speak for yourself
I didn't vote for it. It was obviously brain-dead and anti-representative government.

Tom Tancredo Interview

[ Parent ]
I Did Not Vote For It...
...But then I was too young and being a young Republican I probably would have enthusiastically voted for it had I had the opportunity.  

Matthew

[ Parent ]
Yet Jim Carpenter insists there is not enough support for a change
I wonder what the polls need to show before he's willing to "lead" on this issue. Would 70% be enough?

I've had a boatload of people hammering me for the last 2 days for my being stupid enough to think the voters might consider a tax increase and/or a bond proposal. And yet... it turns out there is support for it.

So can we discuss a major bond proposal for this November's ballot now? Not agree, just discuss?

Tom Tancredo Interview


No.
(Did you know that it's almost October now?)

[ Parent ]
for this November's ballot
That ship has sailed, David.  

[ Parent ]
Robert Kennedy
"Some men see things as they are and say, 'Why'? I dream of things that never were and say, 'Why not'?"

If we do nothing, things will only get worse.

Tom Tancredo Interview


[ Parent ]
You're adorable


"It is hard enough to remember my opinions, without also remembering my reasons for them!" - Nietzsche  

[ Parent ]
Did Bobby Kennedy think ....
...300 days hath September?

[ Parent ]
Bobby Kennedy
knew better than to try to get on the ballot a couple weeks before people started voting.  

[ Parent ]
You guys should all go work for Ritter
With your chorus of "we can't, we can't" you'ld fit right in.

Tom Tancredo Interview

[ Parent ]
Then call the bluff, David
See if you can get a major bond proposal on this November's ballot -- and good luck to you with that!

[ Parent ]
The governor can call a special session of the legislature
Bill Owens was able to do it - why can't Ritter at least try?

Tom Tancredo Interview

[ Parent ]
You should totally roll out Bobby
to the SOS when they point out you need 77,000 signatures to get on the ballot, and other pesky items like "due dates" and "statutes."  

"It is hard enough to remember my opinions, without also remembering my reasons for them!" - Nietzsche  

[ Parent ]
Hate to break it to you...
But the deadline to submit ballot initiatives for 2009 was last spring. Trust me, I was working on one and was right up against the deadline.

But there is still plenty of time for 2010.  


[ Parent ]
Bobby Kennedy says you are a defeatist


"It is hard enough to remember my opinions, without also remembering my reasons for them!" - Nietzsche  

[ Parent ]
Is it for ones that come from the legislature?
[ Parent ]
Some men say ... "why not?"
David, ballots are already printed for the 2009 election. People start voting in a couple weeks.  

[ Parent ]
That's not the question though
The question is can the gov still call a special session, and then can that session put a bond issue on this November's ballot.

If that can be done at this point, I think people will agree that reprinting ballots is a small price to pay.

Tom Tancredo Interview


[ Parent ]
David, read the statutes
Your question doesn't make any sense. Bobby Kennedy might have asked, "Why not?" but at least he had a firm grasp on reality.

[ Parent ]
Damn the law, full speed ahead!
David's daydreams are at stake

[ Parent ]
I tried to find the appropiate law on this
I failed. If you can point me to it, I would appreciate it.

Tom Tancredo Interview

[ Parent ]
All measures to be submitted to voters
must be listed by election officials this year by Sept. 4 (57 days before the election) 1-8-116(2) 1-1-106 (5);

Legislative Council had to publish title and text of all statewide ballot measures in all legal newspapers by Sept. 21 (at least 15 days prior to last day to register for 2009 election) 1-7-903(3);

Official ballots must be printed and in the possession of county clerks by Oct. 2 (at least 32 days before the election) 1-5-403(1);

Ballots must also be mailed by Oct. 2 to all overseas and military voters who requested them - 1-8-111(1);

Ballot issue information booklet (Blue Book) must also be mailed by Oct. 2 - Art. V, Sec. 1(7.5)(b); 1-40-124.5; 1-1-106(5).


[ Parent ]
damn
Ok, Ritter twiddled his thumbs long enough that it no longer possible. To bad...

Tom Tancredo Interview

[ Parent ]
"initiatives" can't come from the legislature
...if you're now talking about a referendum, which is not what you were talking about before, why the sudden switch?  Truth set you free?

[ Parent ]
It's Saturday morning
If only we dared to dream, the guv and the leg could have this thing wrapped by Sunday night. The only thing standing in our way is pessimism. We'll do a new batch of ballots on recycled cardboard, thus saving the environment. Win-win! Synergy!

Let's do this thing!!!!

DOWN WITH PESSIMISM!  

"It is hard enough to remember my opinions, without also remembering my reasons for them!" - Nietzsche  


[ Parent ]
CPI connected to McInnis?
To second Leonard, didn't we already establish that CPI was possibly created as McInnis's 527?  That's what I thought.

http://facethestate.com/articl...

Maybe we should increase the size of the grain of salt with which we are taking this report.


Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?




Advertise Here!
ads@coloradopols.com


Active Users
Currently 52 user(s) logged on.

Search




Advanced Search


Colorado Pols Network


Jeffco Pols
  More >

Denver Pols
  More >















RSS 2.0



Pols Gets Mobile: ColoradoPols.com/mobile/

Colorado Pols is on Twitter: twitter.com/coloradopols

Email Pols


How to Write a Diary That Will Make the Front Page



Terms of Use/Privacy Policy



Pols Posting Policies



The Pols "Mailbag"

Mailbag #1



Relevant Links

The Big Media Blog

Blog It Right

Blog For Growth

Blogometer

Colorado Capitol Journal

Colorado Center on Law and Policy

Colorado Democratic Party

Colorado Ethics Watch

Colorado Independent

Colorado Labor Blog

Colorado Veterans for America

Colorado Legislature

Colorado Lib

Colorado Libertarian Blog

Colorado Media Matters

Colorado Progressive Coalition

Colorado Republican Party

Colorado Secretary of State

Colorado Senate

Colorado Young Democrats

Commentary Today

Coyote Gulch

CU Democrats

Curious Stranger

Daily Kos

Dan Willis-Rumors

Dem Notes

Democracy for Colorado

Denver Politics

East Boulder County Politics

Ed Stein Ink

Election Neutrality Now

George in Denver

Great Education Colorado

Head First Colorado

The Hotline Political Network

Junction Daily Blog

Left in the West

Liberal and Loving It

Maintain Educational Standards in Colorado

Mount Virtus

MyDD

National Journal

On Call

Peak Dems

Political State Report

Progress Now

Prometheus

Project Vote Smart

Radio Free Denver

Senate Guru

Slapstick Politics

Steam Powered Opinions

Square State

Stygius

TalkLeft

The Thicket

The Bell Policy Center

The Hypothetical Wren

ThomasMC.com

Toilet Paper Online

TRACER Campaign Finance

View From a Height

Walter in Denver

Wash Park Prophet

Western Democrat



Colorado Pols is wholly owned by www.ColoradoPols.com, LLC
webmaster-at-coloradopols.com
Powered by: SoapBlox