Last night, Denver7 aired an interview with Sen. Cory Gardner of Colorado that touched on a variety of hot topics–the resignation of National Security Advisor Michael Flynn and the Trump administration’s ties to the Russian government, as well as Gardner’s recent controversial remarks suggesting that citizens showing up at his offices in Colorado and flooding his voicemail boxes are “paid protesters.”
We’ve covered Gardner’s non-answers on the Flynn/Russia questions, but Gardner’s incredibly feeble attempt to defend these allegations of “paid protesters” is worth a note in the record all by itself:
On Tuesday, he addressed the insinuation he made last month that some people protesting him and calling his office were paid protesters. He clarified that he believes there are organizations that are working to connect politically-active people across the country with various lawmakers in Washington, citing a conversation his wife had with one organization.
“We have a number of Coloradans – a large percentage, if not a huge percentage of the people calling our office who are Coloradans. [They are] people who are concerned about nominations, people who are concerned about the price of their health care,” Gardner said.
“But we do have people from out of state calling the office. In fact, just the other day, my wife was contacted by an organized survey effort. She answered the survey and was immediately connected to my very own office.”
“She was not paid to do that, [Pols emphasis] but somebody was paid to make that connection happen not knowing that was my wife,” Gardner said.
Understand this, folks: Cory Gardner was given a wide-open opportunity to defend his insistence that “paid protesters” are responsible for the demonstrations and flooded voicemail boxes at his offices. But the “example” Gardner cites is not a “paid protester” at all, but one of countless automated contact campaigns run by activist groups connecting ordinary (and unpaid) citizens with their elected officials. There’s absolutely nothing inappropriate about that kind of activity, and the contacts between citizens and lawmakers facilitated by these campaigns are as legitimate as any other.
Presumably, this would include Mrs. Gardner as well.
For a politician known for being cool under fire and ready with a slick answer to any question, Gardner’s justification in this interview for accusing the thousands of protesters converging every week outside his offices of being “paid” is an insult to everyone’s intelligence. Gardner’s out-of-hand dismissal of the growing dissent against the Trump administration in Colorado and nationwide spread widely, and was picked up by conservative mouthpieces here and elsewhere as a way of rationalizing what is happening.
Every American who heard Gardner’s original statement needs to know he can’t defend it.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
BY: JohnNorthofDenver
IN: Monday Open Thread
BY: kwtree
IN: Monday Open Thread
BY: 2Jung2Die
IN: Monday Open Thread
BY: kwtree
IN: Thanksgiving Weekend Open Thread
BY: JohnNorthofDenver
IN: Thanksgiving Weekend Open Thread
BY: ParkHill
IN: Thanksgiving Weekend Open Thread
BY: Duke Cox
IN: Thanksgiving Weekend Open Thread
BY: Conserv. Head Banger
IN: Thanksgiving Weekend Open Thread
BY: DavidThi808
IN: Thanksgiving Weekend Open Thread
BY: JohnNorthofDenver
IN: Thanksgiving Weekend Open Thread
Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!
When I have taken advantage of an opportunity to follow up a survey with a message or call to a Senator, every organization has made the effort to find out where I am and then makes a "connection" to an appropriate office. Gardner's spouse's experience seems to confirm that is how it is working for this particular episode.
Gardner's responses to my emails have been generic defenses of his position, not responding to any specifics of my communication.
I just hope media outlets continue to ask him to speak specifically and beyond his initial sound bite.
"Paid advocacy". Sounds eerily familiar.
If hounded relentlessly, Cory will lose his temper and fuck up. Cory is now an official "Big Shot". He should not have to be accountable and answer all these questions the way regular people do.
All Cory has going for him is his slickness and his comfort with complete falsehood as a way of life and a professional imperative….oh, and he will do anything for enough money. Just ask David Koch.
He seems to be inching ever closer to the threshold of fucking up.
I'll be quite happy with Senator Gardner if he votes 'no' on the Congressional Review Act resolution, passed by the House with 11 Republicans opposed, to delete the BLM's methane gas capture Rule.
Why is it necessary to set up elaborate computer programs to "facilitate" citizens contacting their elected officials? Can't people just call their congressman?
Democrats have been paying Progress Now and other liberal attacks groups for so long you can't tell the difference between paid work and volunteer protests. Maybe that's why you support a minimum income for all deadbeats.
Minimum income for all protesters!
Is there something wrong with facilitating contact? Is it wrong to put voters in touch with their elected officials?
You probably have the same issue with things that make voting and registration easier, too, don't you?
So, Moderatus, are you saying that it's OK for Americans for Prosperity to pay organizers on the right, but not ethical for Dems to do the same?
I know Moldy. It's not like AFP does the same thing.
But, hey. It's only bad when the protesters don't agree with you.
Make Google your friend, Moddy.