CO-04 (Special Election) See Full Big Line

(R) Greg Lopez

(R) Trisha Calvarese

90%

10%

President (To Win Colorado) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Biden*

(R) Donald Trump

80%

20%↓

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

90%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

90%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(D) Adam Frisch

(R) Jeff Hurd

(R) Ron Hanks

40%

30%

20%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert

(R) Deborah Flora

(R) J. Sonnenberg

30%↑

15%↑

10%↓

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Dave Williams

(R) Jeff Crank

50%↓

50%↑

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

90%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) Brittany Pettersen

85%↑

 

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(R) Gabe Evans

(R) Janak Joshi

60%↑

35%↓

30%↑

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
September 22, 2022 12:29 PM UTC

Fox 31/Emerson: Polis and Bennet with Double-Digit Leads

  • 6 Comments
  • by: Colorado Pols

UPDATE: Ernest Luning of the publication formerly known as the Colorado Statesman reports on the response from the various campaigns to today’s polling numbers.

Up first, the frat house that is the Joe O’Dea campaign strikes back with its familiar brand of inexplicable chest-pounding:

A spokesman for O’Dea’s campaign disputed the poll’s findings in a text message to Colorado Politics.

“If this is a 10 point race, Joe Biden’s inflation crisis was transitory and Michael Bennet is a professional fly fisherman,” said Kyle Kohli, O’Dea’s communications director.

Saying his candidate has “massive appeal to voters who are sick of both political parties,” Kohli added that the campaign feels as good about O’Dea’s chances as they did when he won the primary in late June despite massive spending by Democrats to boost his more conservative opponent.

Righto! O’Dea spokesperson Kyle Kohli should have erred more toward this response from the campaign for gubernatorial no-hopeful Heidi Ganahl:

Ganahl spokeswoman Lexi Swearingen said her candidate is “looking forward to surprising people again this November,” noting that the Republican won the CU regent’s race six years ago amid predictions she wouldn’t.

This statement is significantly less ridiculous than the one from Kohli, though it wrongly presupposes that more than a handful of Coloradans had any sort of opinion whatsoever on the 2016 CU Regent race. But at least Ganahl’s campaign is taking their lumps with a modicum of grace.

Finally, here’s what the O’Dea and Ganahl campaigns SHOULD have done:

Bennet’s and Polis’ campaigns didn’t respond to a request for comment.

The numbers speak for themselves.

—–

The big Colorado political news this morning comes via a new  FOX31/Channel 2/Emerson College/The Hill poll showing that Democrats hold commanding leads in the two top-ticket races in Colorado.

As The Hill newspaper reports:

Sen. Michael Bennet (D-Colo.) and Colorado Gov. Jared Polis (D) are on track to win their reelection bids in November, with each man holding a double-digit lead over his Republican challenger, according to a new Emerson College Polling/The Hill survey released Thursday.

Incumbent Democratic Gov. Jared Polis leads Republican Hiedi Heidi Ganahl by an astronomical 17 points with less than four weeks to go until Colorado voters start receiving their mail ballots.

Fox 31 is trying their best to make these numbers seem less terrible for Ganahl, but no amount of sugarcoating can change the taste for Republicans:

Of the respondents, 53% said they would vote for Polis if the election were held today, while 36% would vote for Ganahl. But a significant minority of voters said they are still undecided — 9% for this race.

Even if Ganahl picked up every last undecided voter in this poll, she’d still be trailing Polis by 8 points.

Meanwhile, in the race for U.S. Senate, incumbent Democrat Michael Bennet is polling 10 points ahead of Republican Joe O’Dea. The poll shows that 14% of Colorado voters remain undecided, while 4% plan to vote for “Someone Else.”

As The Hill notes, these numbers do not comport with recent claims from national Republicans:

Sen. Rick Scott (R-Fla.), the chair of the National Republican Senatorial Committee (NRSC), told reporters on Tuesday that O’Dea is “barely behind” Bennet in the polls and has a real chance of ousting Colorado’s senior senator this year.

If Scott and the NRSC really believed this, of course, then they would be spending at least some money in Colorado to support O’Dea. But they aren’t.

The Republican path to victory in Colorado is in here somewhere. Maybe.

These new numbers certainly track with other recent public polling in Colorado’s Senate race. Even conservative pollster McLaughlin and Associates had Bennet with an 8-point lead over O’Dea in its mid-August survey. There has been less available public polling in the race for Governor, largely because no serious political professional has been able to find any daylight for Ganahl’s bumbling campaign.

Interestingly, both Ganahl and O’Dea are stuck at about 36% support. This doesn’t suggest a ceiling for the Republican candidates, but there’s not a ton of room for potential growth based on top-ticket races in Colorado over the last decade. Bennet may not be polling at 50%, for example, but recent history suggests that he can win re-election handily regardless; in the last three election cycles, no top-ticket Republican candidate has finished with more than 44% of the total vote in Colorado.

Of course Democrats (and Republicans) still need to keep pushing hard through Election Day to turn out every possible voter, but we’re starting to get a pretty good picture of how things might look in November.

Comments

6 thoughts on “Fox 31/Emerson: Polis and Bennet with Double-Digit Leads

    1. There are not many that have gone public.  And it is discouraging to me that all of them have some form of “Likely Voter” screen applied, because I don’t think those manipulations have been particularly helpful this year.

      RealClearPolitics, aggregator of polls, only has

      p>Poll…………….Date…………….Sample/MoE …….Pettersen (D) …..Aadland (R) …..Spread

      RMG Research*….7/24 – 7/30 ….. 400 LV / 4.9 …….44 ……………..41……………Pettersen 3

      FiveThirtyEight has more:

      District ….. Dates ……… . Sample….. iPollster….. ….. Sponsor…..

      ….. Result….. Net result

      CO-8,….. Jul.26-Aug.2….. 500LV….. Global Strategy Group  Yadira Caraveo

      ….. Caraveo ….. 42%….. ….. 44% Kirkmeyer….. ….. Kirkmeyer 2

      CO-7 ….. Jul.24-30….. 400LV….. RMG Research….. U.S. Term Limits

      ….. Pettersen….. 44%….. 41%….. Aadland….. Pettersen 3

      CO-3 ….. Jul.21-25….. 550LV….. Keating Research….. Adam Frisch

      ….. Frisch….. 42%….. 49%….. Boebert….. Boebert 7

      CO-7….. Jul.18-21….. 400LV…..Meeting Street Insights….. Congressional Leadership Fund (super PAC)

      ….. Pettersen….. 44%….. 42%….. Aadland….. Pettersen 2

      CO-8….. Jun.9-13….. 500LV…..Global Strategy Group….. 314 Action (hybrid PAC)

      ….. Caraveo ….. 36%….. 44%….. Kirkmeyer….. Kirkmeyer 8

    1. No, that's not a reasonable assumption if history is any guide.

      In 2018 Polis ran ahead of the under ticket. In other words, there were people who were unwilling to vote for Dufus Stapleton, voted for Polis, and then voted for the GOP candidates for the under ticket.

      My guess is that Wieser is safe, but I worry about Griswold and Young. Griswold needs to play up Anderson's outreach to the election deniers and the other screwballs in her party. 

      1. Here’s the margins of the 2018 election: 

        OFFICE ………DEM…………..REP ……. MARGIN
        Gov/Lt.Gov:   1,348,888 ….. 1,080,801  ….~268K

        Sec of State: 1,313,716 ….. 1,113,927 ….~200K

        Treasurer      1,292,281 ….. 1,111,641 ….~181K

        AG:                1,285,464  ….. 1,124,757 …~161K

         

  1. In that US Senate race: I'd be concerned about the "Undecided" number since it is higher that the point spread between the candidates. My experience has been "undecided" really means "I ain't telling you". At this stage in the game, the truly "likely voters" know who they are voting for in the top-of-the-ballot races like Governor and US Senator.  And if they are ashamed to say who they are voting for, it's the Republican more often than not.

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

131 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!