Cook Moves Colorado Senate Race, But Not Why You Think

Michael Bennet, Joe O’Dea.

Yesterday, Cook Political Report updated their election forecast rankings in several U.S. Senate races, including Colorado’s where the rating for our race was downgraded from “Likely Democratic” to “Leans Democratic.” It’s a change that left some heads scratching after a poll at the beginning of the week by Republican-leaning McLaughlin and Associates showed incumbent Democratic Sen. Michael Bennet with an eight-point lead over Republican challenger “Rando” Joe O’Dea.

But as Ernest Luning of the Colorado Springs Gazette’s political blog explains, the change in Colorado’s assessed competitiveness by Cook may not be due to anything on the ground in Colorado at all–but rather a deteriorating situation for Republicans in other states narrowing the GOP’s path to a Senate majority, in ways that will obligate more attention to Colorado:

The move coincides with Cook downgrading to a toss-up the GOP’s chances of winning a majority this fall in the 50-50 Senate, [Pols emphasis] where Democrats hold the gavel owing to the tie-breaking vote wielded by Vice President Kamala Harris.

In part, Cook’s Jessica Taylor says, that’ because Republicans have nominated “weak, divisive candidates” in several of the GOP’s must-win states, including Mehmet Oz in Pennsylvania and Blake Masters in Arizona. Colorado’s rating change appears to be partially a byproduct of the GOP’s less-than-stellar standard bearers in other states once considered riper targets, leaving national Republicans strategists “hav(ing) to find other plausible races.”

Cook cites Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell’s remarks last month calling O’Dea “the perfect candidate” for Colorado and a declaration that national Republicans are going to get involved in the race. Democrats, meanwhile, “acknowledge this isn’t in the bag and is closer than many people think,” according to an unnamed Colorado GOP strategist quoted by Cook. The same strategist acknowledges that key constituencies could be difficult for the Republican to carry unless the election is primarily about the economy and not abortion or other social issues.

This is very important to understand, and kudos to Ernest Luning for looking past the headlines to see what’s really going on here. It’s not that Joe O’Dea has demonstrated any real strength in this race. The only thing O’Dea really has going for him at this point is not being Mehmet Oz, Herschel Walker, or Blake Masters. As Republican Senate campaigns in more winnable states sputter under weak candidates, Colorado moves up in importance for Republicans by default, not by choice.

Yesterday, National Review’s Jim Geraghty summed up the increasingly troubled outlook for Senate Republicans:

The collapse of Oz in Pennsylvania makes Georgia look relatively good, as Herschel Walker is still hanging around, even if he’s trailing. There’s no getting around it: Walker is a disappointing candidate who is struggling to improve his communication skills on the trail…

[T]he narrative that Republicans are blowing their chances in what should be winnable races because they nominate deeply flawed, relatively unknown, far-too-Trumpy or extreme candidates has a lot of evidence to support those contentions. Blake Masters has yet to look all that strong against incumbent Democrat Mark Kelly in Arizona’s Senate race, which was expected to be one of the most competitive races of the cycle. The hopes that Joe O’Dea would give incumbent Democrat Michael Bennet a serious run for his money in Colorado have yet to bear fruit. [Pols emphasis]

In war as in politics, there’s a huge difference between being on the offensive to victory and becoming the fallback option as the tide of battle turns against you. As Republicans fumble more winnable Senate races in other states, they’re looking to O’Dea out of desperation more than hope. But the fundamentals still apply: O’Dea is still a candidate with zero political experience, struggling to distance himself from the locally toxic Republican brand, and reliant on his personal fortune and political consultants to manufacture his aura of competitiveness.

And yes, he’s not Ron Hanks. But that’s not going to be enough.

9 Community Comments, Facebook Comments

  1. JohnInDenver says:

    Cook now has Bennet and Hassan-NH in the “Leans” category, along with the PA-Open seat now held by Republican Toomey.

    On the R side of the aisle, Cook “Leans” includes Rubio-FL, Open-NC, and Open-OH.  Plus Johnson-WI as a Toss Up race. 

    They get paid $35 a month by their subscribers (or groups “Plans start at $1400”) and I don’t get paid at all.  But I think it worth noting that 2 years ago, on August 17, 2020, their breaking news was “South Carolina Senate Moves From Likely to Lean Republican”.  The vote, in November 2020? 

    Lindsey Graham (R) ….54.4%…..1,369,137

    Jaime Harrison (D)……..44.2%……1,110,828

    So somehow, I’m a bit skeptical of “Likely to Lean” analysis.  I have a sneaking suspicion the move got nearly as much discussion from political analysts as it did from the business side, wanting to maintain subscriber interest and revenue.

  2. Early Worm says:

    As a Democrat, I do not want to take anything for granted. But, with the Dobbs opinion, I think it is going to be very difficult for a Republican to be elected to the Senate in this otherwise purple state. Cory Gardner in 2014 – fool me once, shame on you, fool me twice shame on me. 

  3. DavidThi808 says:

    If they're putting money into Colorado as one of the best Republican opportunities – they're in deep deep shit.

    • NOV GOP meltdown says:

      Let's hope so, to the tune of, "you had these midterm elections in the bag until all of this crazy shit you did".

    • JohnInDenver says:

      The announcement today of a group injecting LOTS of money ($28M) into the OHIO Senate race astonished me.  JD Vance is relatively rich, and well connected to LOTS of other rich Republicans, and Ohio small donors have trended R for the past decade.

      US House delegation is 12 R, 4 D.. 

      The Governor (and every other Constitutional executive) is Republican. Since 1992, there have  been 4 years of a Democratic Governor.  State Senate has a Republican majority since 1992. State House has had 5 years of Democratic control (last in 2010).  Taken as a whole, twenty-four years of Republican trifectas (7 years not), and no D trifecta.

       

    • notaskinnycook says:

      Republicans are wasting money? That breaks my heart.laugh

  4. Gilpin Guy says:

    Great job of political reporting Pols.  The subtlety of the Cook report and the unraveling of the why was excellent.  Keep up the great analysis.

Leave a Reply

Comment from your Facebook account


You may comment with your Colorado Pols account above (click here to register), or via Facebook below.