President (To Win Colorado) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Biden*

(R) Donald Trump

80%

20%↓

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

90%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

90%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(D) Adam Frisch

(R) Jeff Hurd

(R) Ron Hanks

40%

30%

20%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert

(R) J. Sonnenberg

(R) Ted Harvey

20%↑

15%↑

10%

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Dave Williams

(R) Jeff Crank

(R) Doug Bruce

20%

20%

20%

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

90%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) Brittany Pettersen

85%↑

 

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(R) Gabe Evans

(R) Janak Joshi

60%↑

40%↑

20%↑

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
December 01, 2020 11:51 AM UTC

Republicans Pretend to be Worried About National Debt Again

  • 14 Comments
  • by: Colorado Pols
Yup, it’s about that time.

This story from The Washington Post about President-elect Joe Biden’s economic team caught our attention for the ridiculous but altogether predictable move from Congressional Republicans to suddenly pretend to be worried about the national debt again:

President-elect Joe Biden’s choice of economic advisers highlights a commitment to spend whatever is needed to restore a full-employment economy, setting up a clash with Senate Republicans who are sounding alarms over a national debt they helped President Trump increase by nearly $7 trillion…

…Indeed, Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.), slated to chair the Senate Budget Committee if Republicans maintain control of the upper chamber, told reporters after the Nov. 3 election that he wants to “finally begin to address the debt.”

Likewise, Sen. John Thune (S.D.), the No. 2 Senate Republican, said he expects to focus next year on curbing spending on entitlement programs, adding: “I think that’s kind of getting back to our DNA. … I think spending, entitlement reform, growth and the economy are all things that we’re going to have to be focused on.”

Top Democrats scoff at Republicans’ renewed debt fears after years of their support for Trump’s budget-busting policies. In 2017, for example, every Republican senator voted in favor of the president’s signature tax cut, which added $1.9 trillion to the debt, according to the nonpartisan Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget. [Pols emphasis]

This is an absurd but of political theater that happens every time a Democrat is elected President of the United States: Republicans start clutching their pearls, aghast that the federal government actually cashed all of the ridiculous checks that they signed over the last four years.

Let’s see, which party was in charge here?

As Chuck Jones wrote for Forbes in September, the national debt is on track to increase more in four years of the Trump administration than in EIGHT years under President Obama:

In Trump’s first three years the deficit increased from $585 billion in fiscal 2016 to $984 billion in fiscal 2019, up 68%, for a total of $2.4 trillion. If the coronavirus had not hit this years deficit was on-track to be $1.1 trillion, per the Congressional Budget Office or CBO, which would then make Trump’s first four years deficits total $3.5 trillion. At $1 trillion or more this would have been the largest budget deficit in history with a growing economy and the largest as a percentage of GDP outside of recessions or World War II.

The numbers don’t lie, even if Republicans will.

Comments

14 thoughts on “Republicans Pretend to be Worried About National Debt Again

  1. YESTERDAY

    Go Donald Trump  !

    MAGA !

    Deficits don't matter

    Own the libs !

    TODAY

    Who ?

    America is in decline !

    Spending is out of control !!!

    This is liberal overreach !

    SSDD 

    1. Referencing Chuck Jones from Forbes, some conservatives do have their shit together, besides The Bulwark and the Lincoln Project. Couple years ago, Forbes provided economic charts showing that the pre-pandemic Trump economy was merely an extension of the Obama economy.

      1. I believe Forbes were referring to the continuing growth in the economy and employment, which was true, despite Trump’s attempts to bring world trade to a halt with tariffs on friends and foes alike. Not to mention cutting off foreign students getting advanced degrees from our universities, thus rejecting our net brain gain that has fueled some of our most successful and innovative companies over the last century.

          1. Not to be picky…… Didn’t Herbert Hoover also have a net loss of jobs? What about G.W. Bush leaving in the midst of the Great Recession? Just wondering as I have not checked any charts.

            1. Can't be sure about that:

              Fact Checker Analysis Biden’s claim that Trump will be the first president with a negative jobs record

              • Bill Clinton: 22.745 million jobs
              • Ronald Reagan: 16.322 million
              • Barack Obama: 12.503 million
              • Lyndon B. Johnson: 12.338 million
              • Jimmy Carter: 10.117 million
              • Harry S. Truman: 9.035 million
              • Richard Nixon: 8.911 million
              • John F. Kennedy: 3.804 million
              • Dwight D. Eisenhower: 3.218 million
              • George H.W. Bush: 2.617 million
              • Gerald R. Ford: 2.378 million
              • George W. Bush: 0.523 million
              • Donald Trump: -4.901 million

              Bush was close to be a net loser on jobs.

              Clinton had the best record.

  2. I'll believe Republicans are serious about the debt when they recommend going back to the tax program of the last period when deficits were $0 — which I believe was in 1998 and 1999.

    I'd believe Republicans are serious about the debt when they are willing to initiate a deal offered by Democrats before:  $1 in cuts for $1 for tax increases.

    I'd even think it might be worthwhile to hear testimony and consider the idea of a reverse sequester — cut $1 somewhere in domestic spending or entitlement for a cut of $1 in military spending or corporate welfare.

    I consider any of those scenarios far fetched.

    1. Let's start by beating the two criminal hypocrites running to keep their Senate seats in GA.

      Moscow Mitch has been far too successful in keeping all of the scandalous government trickery he is responsible for off the radar and out of the spotlight.

  3. Perdue and Loeffler are full blown criminals, for sure. Public service just ain’t their thang (…in Ga. vernacular). My sister and two brothers live near Atlanta. They are all Democrats.

    I will check in with them from time to time to see what is happening on the ground there. 

    The Lincoln Project would do well to go after EVERY Republican senator, with a vengeance. And, every Trumplican© needs to write in Trump for Senate.

  4. If a righteous Republican talks about how horrible the deficit is then we can talk about the need for tax reform.  It's past time to repeal the Trump and Bush tax cuts and stop subsidizing the wealthy.  Don't let him talk about the one without acknowledging the other.

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

172 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!