CO-04 (Special Election) See Full Big Line

(R) Greg Lopez

(R) Trisha Calvarese

90%

10%

President (To Win Colorado) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Biden*

(R) Donald Trump

80%

20%↓

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

90%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

90%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(D) Adam Frisch

(R) Jeff Hurd

(R) Ron Hanks

40%

30%

20%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert

(R) Deborah Flora

(R) J. Sonnenberg

30%↑

15%↑

10%↓

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Dave Williams

(R) Jeff Crank

50%↓

50%↑

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

90%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) Brittany Pettersen

85%↑

 

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(R) Gabe Evans

(R) Janak Joshi

60%↑

35%↓

30%↑

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
May 10, 2020 09:59 AM UTC

Cory Gardner Made His Bed. Now It's Burning

  • 13 Comments
  • by: Colorado Pols
President Donald Trump, Sen. Cory Gardner (R-Yuma)

In today’s Washington Post analysis of the U.S. Senate playing field by veteran reporters Seung Min Kim and Mike DeBonis, a newsworthy development for all of us following vulnerable incumbent Sen. Cory Gardner of Colorado’s race to survive against the odds–the first public discussion we’ve seen or heard of the possibility that Gardner has already been “written off” by national Republican strategists:

Republicans are increasingly nervous they could lose control of the Senate this fall as a potent combination of a cratering economy, President Trump’s handling of the pandemic and rising enthusiasm among Democratic voters dims their electoral prospects…

The emerging consensus of several Republican strategists is that GOP incumbents should be able to hang on in states Trump won in 2016 if the president can hang onto those states himself. That list includes North Carolina, Arizona and Iowa, which Democrats are heavily targeting this cycle.

The flip side for Republicans is that states Trump lost in 2016 — such as Colorado and Maine — could be out of reach. Many GOP strategists have already written off Sen. Cory Gardner (R-Colo.), [Pols emphasis] barring a major shift, and some have doubts that Collins will be able to continue her trend of faring far better in elections than Republican presidential candidates she has shared the ballot with.

To be clear, no one outside a relatively compact national GOP decisionmaking loop will know if Gardner has been written off as a certain loss until that becomes evident in visible ways–ad buys that don’t materialize, fundraising drying up, and so forth. But with Gardner’s poll numbers already trending downward from bad into true blowout territory, and a generally bleak outlook for Senate Republicans under the aggregate weight of Trump’s weakness and the pandemic’s devastation, Gardner really does seem to be on the verge of being, as they say when they make the hard calls, “triaged out.”

AP’s weekend look at the Senate race also cites Sen. Gardner of Colorado as singular example of vulnerability among Republican U.S. Senators up in 2020:

The president in office during the onset of Great Depression, Herbert Hoover, was routed in his 1932 reelection bid. Voters also cast out other recent incumbents who presided over sluggish economies, including Jimmy Carter and George H.W. Bush, while Barack Obama was elected in 2008 after Republicans took the brunt of the blame for the collapse of the financial markets that fall.

If that happens again, the GOP isn’t just worried about keeping the White House. Voters who reject Trump may also turn against Republican candidates for Congress. That’s especially concerning for Sen. Cory Gardner of Colorado, [Pols emphasis] which has been trending Democratic in recent years, and could cause problems for GOP Sens. Susan Collins of Maine, Thom Tills of North Carolina and Martha McSally in Arizona, where close presidential races are expected.

The circumstances today are exactly not the same as those leading up to the 1932 elections, which took place after several years of economic disaster and ineffective political response by a Republican administration leading to an historic period of Democratic dominance in Congress and the White House. The shock of the massive job losses we’ve seen in the last two months has not been fully absorbed by the public, and the consequences in human terms are not yet apparent. It’s clear from polling that the Republican campaign especially in Colorado to blame Democrats for the economic pain from necessary measures to combat the pandemic has failed, and the story of gross incompetence by Republicans from the White House down in the face of the greatest challenge of our lifetimes so far has solidified as the publicly accepted narrative of events.

In October of 2016, Cory Gardner called for Donald Trump to pull out of the presidential race. Trump didn’t, unexpectedly won, and Gardner transformed himself from “Never Trumper” to Trump’s most loyal defender and ally without ever once explaining his change of heart. Gardner kept his game face through nearly every one of Trump’s innumerable gaffes, scandalously hateful non-gaffes, two damning foreign policy investigations, and finally an impeachment trial. As the COVID-19 pandemic loomed in late February, Gardner and Trump held a joint rally in front of thousands of packed-in supporters in Colorado Springs–right before Trump and Gardner personally worked together to turn the federal government’s response to the pandemic into a spectacle of logistical chaos and political cronyism.

Even at a moment as unprecedented as this, there are fundamentals that apply as long as the American political system as we know it exists. If there is anyone in this country–maybe on this planet–who has earned his fate as a political dead man walking in 2020, it’s Sen. Cory Gardner. This reality, apparent locally for some time, is now evident to everyone.

Comments

13 thoughts on “Cory Gardner Made His Bed. Now It’s Burning

  1. "The shock of the massive job losses we’ve seen in the last two months has not been fully absorbed by the public"
    Exactly.
    The import of the pandemic will always lag.
    This means that voters in November will be voting with September emotions.
    Therefore, The Dumpster® has just 4 months to "get the economy" back to normal.

    1. James Carville said in a recent interview (11th hour?) that pres elections are won or lost in the spring of the election year. So despite all of the advantages of incumbency, a huge cash advantage, unbearable negative campaigning and continued support from Russia; Dump is going to be dumped … if you believe Carville.

      Carville has also said that all of Dump’s campaign machinery is now just grifting him, telling him what he wants to hear so that they can continue to hoover up all of the campaign cash that they can as quickly as they can as long as they can.

      Parscale drives a Ferrari and has a FL beachfront home or two.

      1. Carville has also said that all of Dump’s campaign machinery is now just grifting him, telling him what he wants to hear so that they can continue to hoover up all of the campaign cash that they can as quickly as they can as long as they can.

        ah..yup.

        1. Carville must think they’re being paid in advance? . . .

          . . . history tells us they’re hoovering IOUs; as good as gold Ttump’s word.

          1. Nope. From one of the most trusted sources on the internet:

            https://www.wonkette.com/search/?q=parscale

            Helpful Trump Campaign Manager Brad Parscale Separating Fools From Their Money

            Ratfucking pays, y'all.

            Trump Supporters Waste $46 Million On Genuine, Pre-Owned Impeached President

            Did they at least get some magic beans?

            Trump Campaign Manager Brad Parscale Draining Swamp All Over His Wife

            Is Parscale pissing on our leg, or is it raining?

             

             

  2. Inexplicably "The shock of the massive job losses …, the consequences in human terms …" and Buck's votes and scandals may not be sufficient weight to sink him.

  3. But….but….but….but….but…..!!!!!  Trump will definitely be re-elected because everything is China's fault! 3.5% unemployment rate will be back by Labor Day!!! Trump will Make America Great Yet Again!!!!  It's all China's fault!!!!

    "Dear Leader" may want to be cautious about blaming everything on China as Bank of China may call in his $120 million loan early. Would love to see that happen. Then Deutsche Bank calls its loans. Trump loses in November and gets quick dates with the NY AG and Manhattan DA. 

     

  4. Wait, are you trying to tell me that wreaking havoc with the economy, the climate, our lives, and not least of all, the rule of law is *not* a job well done, deserving of re-election?

    C'mon man, there are billionaires out there still having to pay taxes!  Cory's job isn't finished yet!

    1. Don't know if you remember the last time someone came up with the idea of "improving" the Postal Service and making it more "business like."  Trump messing around with the Post Offices is playing with fire.

      2013 — proposal was to drop Saturday delivery for residences and businesses, but delivered to post office boxes.  Introduced in early February, planned to go into effect in August, USPS pointed to "market research and other research has indicated that nearly 7 in 10 Americans support the switch to five-day delivery."  Would have saved something like $2 billion in the first year, and perhaps even more going forward. 

      Congress voted to continue the requirement of Saturday delivery in a continuing resolution in late March.  Lots of reaction — as in a BIG reaction from mailing industry and advertising in general.  More than a little from residential recipients, particularly from (you guessed it) small towns and rural areas.

      1. Exactly: Postal Service losing money because of congressional mandate not low prices, expert says

        The reason the postal service is losing money is because of a congressionally mandated retirement healthcare funding program that no other government agency is required to observe. This creates a $6.5 billion annual shortfall that could easily be avoided.”

        Just like the ACA the GOP congress deliberately tried to kill the Postal Service, and only managed to wound it.

        1. Combo causation —

           * mandated benefits pre-funding (as you mention)

           * capped revenues on a variety of existing services

           * blocked from offering some additional services (postal banking, consumer loans, accepting government fees & taxes, providing internet services)

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

73 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!