CO-04 (Special Election) See Full Big Line

(R) Greg Lopez

(R) Trisha Calvarese

90%

10%

President (To Win Colorado) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Biden*

(R) Donald Trump

80%

20%↓

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

90%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

90%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(D) Adam Frisch

(R) Jeff Hurd

(R) Ron Hanks

40%

30%

20%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert

(R) Deborah Flora

(R) J. Sonnenberg

30%↑

15%↑

10%↓

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Dave Williams

(R) Jeff Crank

50%↓

50%↑

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

90%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) Brittany Pettersen

85%↑

 

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(R) Gabe Evans

(R) Janak Joshi

60%↑

35%↓

30%↑

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
May 03, 2020 03:58 PM UTC

The Gazette Editorial Board Breaks Out the Crayons (Again)

  • 2 Comments
  • by: Colorado Pols

We’ve occasionally taken time in this space to discuss the completely absurd editorial board of The Colorado Springs Gazette, which is basically the newspaper version of your drunk uncle at Thanksgiving. In fact, we wrote about the Gazette editorial board just a few weeks ago after it vomited out an opinion titled: “Should we save all lives in Colorado regardless of expense?

The Gazette long ago stopped even pretending to hide its political biases and interests. The newspaper has also generally given up on fact-based arguments in support of its perplexing opinions; we went so far as to call a certain 2018 editorial “the dumbest thing you will read this year” (we were not wrong). On Election Day in 2018, when it was clear that Democrats were well on their way to an historic trouncing of Republicans up and down the ballot, the Gazette published a charming editorial preemptively trashing “ill-informed decisions” by Colorado voters.

So it is that the Gazette published another gem on Friday — a thinly-veiled editorial about economic recovery funds that was primarily just an excuse to take a shot at former Gov. John Hickenlooper in advance of his likely General Election campaign for U.S. Senate against incumbent Republican Cory Gardner. The gist of Friday’s editorial is that “the media and watchdogs among the general public” really need to keep their eyes on federal and state recovery funds or else Hickenlooper will steal it all, or something:

This is not the first time federal funds have flowed into states to help with recovery from an economic crisis. Back in 2003, Colorado received $157 million from the Jobs and Growth Tax Relief Reconciliation Act. The state government was authorized to use the money only for costs to “provide essential government services to cover the costs” of federal mandates associated with the 9/11 attacks on the country by terrorists in 2001.

At first, state government used the money for job training, upgrades to public transportation security, law enforcement, and other costs reasonably associated with recovering from and avoiding another attack. Later, the federal government slightly relaxed standards and liberated states to use leftover funds for essential states services.

Seven years after Colorado received the recovery funds, former Denver Mayor John Hickenlooper took office as governor. He began using the remaining funds, which amounted to about $10 million, to pay for an array of expenses that have no apparent nexus to essential government services.

The Gazette editorial board is attempting once again to bring up Hickenlooper’s relation to a mythical “post-9/11 recovery fund” that most everyone else just remembers as the 2003 Bush Tax Cuts (for more, check out this in-depth story written by Erik Maulbetsch of The Colorado Times-Recorder about how this entire narrative has been reimagined as a hit piece against Hickenlooper). The short version here is that the Gazette is again pushing a dubious ethics complaint claiming that Hickenlooper misspent federal/state funds for personal or political reasons.

It’s interesting to note what the Gazette chooses to ignore in their selective historical analysis of state spending. For example, one of the chief complaints against Hickenlooper is that he unjustly tapped state money to pay for certain travel expenses. The Gazette fails to mention that after Colorado received these federal funds in 2003, Republican Gov. Bill Owens bought an entire airplane. Here’s what The Denver Post wrote on the subject in October 2003:

Some of the money went toward repairs to the state’s prisons and  institutions of higher learning. Other funds were allocated to help poor children and pregnant women whose programs were cut by budget shortfalls. And $3.9 million was spent on a new state airplane.

Was it wrong for Owens to buy a state airplane? Probably not, but it is certainly important context if you are going to shake your fist at Hickenlooper for tapping the same fund for travel expenses. If this money really was intended as a “9/11 recovery fund,” then you’ve got bigger bones to pick than with Hick.

And speaking of context…let’s take a look at who spent most of this money, and when. Via the Colorado Transparency Database:

The vast majority (85%) of federal funds allocated to Colorado via the Bush Tax Cuts were spent over the final four years of the Owens administration. Again, if these funds were really intended as a post-9/11 stimulus, then the Gazette should have a lot of questions for Colorado’s last Republican governor.

The Gazette editorial board has the same trouble with numbers that it has with words. These are the same folks who predicted a year ago that Senate Bill 181 “will almost certainly cause a long-term statewide recession” (SPOILER ALERT: It did not.)

So while you can’t trust the Gazette editorial board to be factually accurate, it can still be a decent barometer of political opinion…because it’s almost always wrong.

Comments

2 thoughts on “The Gazette Editorial Board Breaks Out the Crayons (Again)

  1. I don't seem to recall the CS Gazette taking a hard line on Republicans using state funds for dubious purposes.  Did they ever hint at problems with Wayne Williams buying a hat and boots with office funds?

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

246 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!