Gardner May Not Have a Breaking Point with Trump

♦ Soliciting foreign governments to interfere in our elections:

♦ Comparing impeachment investigations to a “lynching“:

♦ Proposing to build a wall around Colorado:

Taking money from Colorado military projects for border wall funding:

♦ Using the White House for personal financial gain:

♦ Pulling U.S. troops out of Syria, all but handing the region to Russia:

 

Senator Cory Gardner is going down with the ship.

Colorado Sen. Cory Gardner (R-Yuma) has plenty of reasons to bail on his support of President Trump. The list grows longer every week. Yet Gardner remains unflinchingly loyal to a President who would toss him under the bus without a second thought should it benefit him in even the smallest of ways.

How much more Trump can Gardner swallow without finally heaving? On Wednesday, CNN’s Chris Cillizza pondered this question for Republicans in general:

It’s worth remembering that fact at this moment as congressional Republicans find themselves confronted with a cavalcade of troubling news stories about President Donald Trump and his conduct in office. Because while elected GOP officials have almost totally capitulated to Trump’s hostile takeover of their party, there is always a point at which you simply cannot look even quasi-objectively at the actions of this president and conclude that standing behind him remains the right (or even defensible) thing to do…

…The vast majority of congressional Republicans continue to stand behind Trump — due in no small part to their fear that stepping out on a limb to say he needs to go (or even that the impeachment inquiry is the right thing to do) will lead to the President singling them out and ending their political careers.

Remember, however: Everyone — everyone — has a breaking point. And it’s hard to see how at least some congressional Republicans aren’t very near theirs after this week.

Cillizza is correct in saying that everyone has a breaking point, but what about Gardner? We’ve pondered this question on several occasions, half-joking that President Trump might not even lose Gardner’s support if he gave the order to bomb the Senator’s hometown of Yuma, Colorado. Gardner is now approaching his personal Maginot Line, closing in on a meaningless vote of support for Trump that he won’t ever be able to take back.

Of course, Gardner isn’t the only Colorado Republican to have cast his lot with Trump. Congressmen Scott Tipton (R-Cortez) and Doug Lamborn (R-Colorado Springs) are co-chairs of Trump’s re-election campaign in Colorado. State Republican Party Chairman/Congressman Ken Buck (R-Greeley) has been a reliable Trumpian who supported House Republicans storming the gates of a secure hearing room in protest of impeachment investigations.

But Tipton, Lamborn, and Buck all represent fairly conservative districts in which blind support for Trump is politically more beneficial than harmful. By any statewide measure, this is not equally true for Gardner, and even conservative Colorado voices agree:

This sort of advice made a lot of sense a long time ago, but it’s too late for Gardner to change course now; he’s cast too many terrible votes and shamelessly defended Trump too often to suddenly pretend to have gained a conscience. Gardner has shown, repeatedly, that he is willing to commit political suicide in order to remain in good standing with Trump. The only way out for Gardner is to hope beyond hope that Trump is somehow vindicated in the next 12 months and can limp his way to re-election in 2020. Any Trump turnaround probably won’t be enough to get Gardner re-elected as well, but Colorado’s Senator would undoubtedly try to cash in on his Trump loyalty with some sort of cabinet-level position.

Gardner has had numerous chances to take a meaningful stand in opposition to Trump. He has let each of them pass without challenge. There’s no reason to believe this going to change now.

89 Shares

7 Community Comments, Facebook Comments

  1. PseudonymousPseudonymous says:

    Why would Cory break?  There's no advantage to dumping Trump.  He has numbers at least as good as the ones we do on a potential election and knows he's done.  Any chance of him getting elected involves holding the R base, and that path lies with fealty to the Dear Leader.  Can't have Tancracist or a schlub like Roger coming at him from the right, for sure.

    Support Trump, get a cushy gig after he's voted out.  There's no "never Trumper" that will hold it against him, and certainly the Kochs won't.

    • Conserv. Head Banger says:

      As a Never-Trump Republican, I'll say that Gardner has been a big disappointment.

      About him "getting a cushy gig" if he's voted out, and how I might feel about that (hold it against him), let's talk after the election. Election is still a year away and a lot can happen in the interim.

    • Meiner49erMeiner49er says:

      and the Koch's may actually reward him for it down the road, after he spends a decade or so in a cushy lobbying job. As much as I loathe him, Gardner is playing the hand he's been dealt well, for the long term.

  2. RepealAndReplace says:

    After the deadline for primary challengers to crawl out of the woodwork, I suspect Gardner will adopt a different tone. I don't think may people will be fooled. But I do think he will adapt.

  3. davebarnesdavebarnes says:

    I do think that Smiling Cory would break with The Dumpster® if: Trump raped a 13-year-old girl on 5th Avenue and then shot her to prevent her testifying against him.

  4. DeanDean says:

    Assuming the Democratic challenger (maybe Hick, maybe not) doesn't step on too many rakes between now and next November, Senator Gardner has a really steep hill to climb to keep his seat. And he'll be doing it on his own. I mean, in most endangered Republican situations the remedy is to send in Trump for a rally or two. There is no way that scores points in Colorado.

Leave a Reply

Comment from your Facebook account


You may comment with your Colorado Pols account above (click here to register), or via Facebook below.