CO-04 (Special Election) See Full Big Line

(R) Greg Lopez

(R) Trisha Calvarese

90%

10%

President (To Win Colorado) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Biden*

(R) Donald Trump

80%

20%↓

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

90%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

90%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(D) Adam Frisch

(R) Jeff Hurd

(R) Ron Hanks

40%

30%

20%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert

(R) Deborah Flora

(R) J. Sonnenberg

30%↑

15%↑

10%↓

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Dave Williams

(R) Jeff Crank

50%↓

50%↑

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

90%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) Brittany Pettersen

85%↑

 

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(R) Gabe Evans

(R) Janak Joshi

60%↑

35%↓

30%↑

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
April 15, 2010 11:16 PM UTC

Buck Doesn't Bring Home The...Um...Bucks

  • 33 Comments
  • by: Colorado Pols

Republican Ken Buck’s campaign for U.S. Senate has apparently released fundraising figures, and while they aren’t as bad as his pathetic $40,000 in the last quarter of 2009, they ain’t good, either.

Buck announced total receipts of $218,791, which includes a $100,000 loan to the campaign. In other words, Buck raised about $119,000 in Q1. To put that in comparison, former Senate candidate and current GOP challenger in CD-7, Ryan Frazier, raised $230,000 in Q1.

Democratic Sen. Michael Bennet raised almost 14 times more money in Q1 than Buck. GOP Challenger Jane Norton’s $816,000 in Q1 is a good eight times more than what Buck raised.

Not only are these terrible numbers for a U.S. Senate candidate, but Buck’s low fundraising totals are really going to start shining a spotlight on the outside interest groups running ads for Buck and how much coordination might be going on with his campaign. As Norton’s spokesperson said earlier this week:

Americans for Job Security is a 501 c(6), which doesn’t have to provide individual donor lists – something decried among some Democrats and Republicans as a non-transparent way to heavily influence a campaign…

…”Ken Buck has shown absolutely no ability to earn financial support, instead relying on more than $1.1 million in attack ads bought by out-of-state interest groups,” he said in an email. “This is campaign finance abuse at its worse, and Ken Buck’s sanction has moved from implied to explicit with his gleeful embrace of 527 cash from Washington special interests.”

 

Comments

33 thoughts on “Buck Doesn’t Bring Home The…Um…Bucks

      1. The money won’t keep flowing from his surrogates if he continues to prove he can’t raise diddly squat on his own. I see what you’re saying but there’s just no way this pathetic showing for 1st quarter doesn’t matter.

      2. Buck is also a much stronger general election candidate as he has a deeper resume.

        Look for donations generated by Senate DeMint and others to perk up Buck’s totals next quarter.  To think he almost dropped out and Jane Norton blew the chance to run only against Tom Wiens.

  1. Perish the thought!

    The Buck campaign site appears to be shocked! — pleasantly shocked! — to discover all this third-party largesse:

    Latest News

    Campaign for Liberty

    Independent group launches pro-Buck ad

    Jan. 28, 2010

    An independent expenditure group, Campaign for Liberty, began televising this advertisement in Denver Jan. 25. Our campaign cannot legally communicate with this group, but click the link below for a report in Talking Points Memo that includes more details.

    1. Mr. Buck’s campaign is literally on life support from the third party groups. If he can’t raise money, and so far his totals are abysmal, they won’t stick around through the primary. His campaign is looking less and less like a winner.  

        1. Over the past six months (October 1, 2002 through March 31, 2010), Mr. Buck has raised a grand total of $159,000, not including his loan of $100,000 to his campaign. Divided by 180 days that equals $883 each day. With seven months to go before the general elction (approximately 210 days) that equals an additional $185,430 through eleciton day in November. He will raise more than that if he wins the primary but his fundraising has to raise questions about his viability.

            1. he has to at least raise $5 million on his own and right now he isn’t any where close to raising that amount. I don’t think he can raise that much between August 10th and election day in November.

            2. wouldn’t the same be true for Romanoff?  If he wins the primary all the big money that’s going to Bennet will go to him?

              Just wondering about your logic here.

              1. First- Romanoff won’t take PAC money, though less than 18% of Bennet’s donations that part goes to zero.

                Second – individual D donors may come over. They may not. R’s rend to be more organized that way.

                Third- just like Buck, and what David is forgetting or ignoring in his excitement about being right about Buck’s popularity, is that neither have shown big fundraising chops.

            3. Assuming a senate candidate needs to raise $5 million before election day this November, exclusive of 527 or other kinds of independent expenditures, Mr. Buck or any other candidate must raise around $23,810 per day from April 1st through election day. At the moment, Mr. Buck is raising around $883 each day or $23,000 less than he should. Each day he doesn’t raise the required amount increases what he must raise the following day. Logically and immediately, unless his fund raising increases by leaps and bounds, it will be impossible for him to raise the amounts of money he will need to run a credible general election campaign.

              1. If he wins the primary with a couple of hundred thousand, I wouldn’t be the farm that he would need 5M to win the general. It’s a weird year and the impact of the web keeps growing. I will be very nervous if Buck wins the primary.

            4. While some money will obviously come in, there’s NO WAY he brings in enough.

              Since our primary is in August that doesn’t leave enough time to raise the money necessary to fight Bennet and win.

              Regardless of outside help with airtime, this race is going to be a record. Obama needs to save some Democrats for the Senate. We want this seat back.

              Its gonna get ugly and expensive. If our candidate can’t raise money, he needs to step aside.

              Or is it about Buck’s ego and not us?

      1. During the 2008 campaign anytime anything happened that was a downer for Republicans the spin was that it was good news for McCain because it was going to somehow be turned into a Republican advantage.  Obama beating Clinton was good news because it meant McCain was going to face a weaker opponent.  The economy going down the tubes was good news because it showed that the fundamentals of our economy were so strong that we could take a downturn.  yadda yadda yadda.  It was a joke on how everything is good news to Republicans somehow.  

  2. Previously, before the “post-Norton decides to petition” position where are now in, I gave Buck a bar at 400k, and he delivers with 120k in actual fundraising. Underwhelming. I think this knocks out the euphoria his camp has had, given the DeMint momentum and party support through following the conventional process. But God, if he can only muster that much, he would get trounced in the general.

    1. I don’t think Buck gives a … (well it rhymes!)

      His head is SO in the clouds, he things he can win with no money.

      Maybe he can if the “mystery donor” keeps plowing $500K into a new group every other week for commercials. I just wonder what the “mystery” will demand in return.

      Its not that hard to guess who it is. The Post pointed out that nearly all of Buck’s donations came from one company and their families. Hensel…

      Hmmm…. I wonder what company is buying the airtime…

  3. The Average Joe being assaulted with attack ads doesn’t care if they’re funded by Buck himself or the 501(c)(6)s or whatever.

    Just like the Average Joe doesn’t give a rat’s ass that Sarah Palin is dumb as a post and screeches like nails on a chalkboard. She’s purty.

    1. Norton keeps pulling cash and it has only made it possible for her to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory. David Thi is right: It’s a weird year and especially on the right in Colorado.

      Buck’s cash will increase on the ground through the web and the tea parties and he’ll keep getting money from his special mystery friends. The combination, even at this stage, is proving deadly to Norton.  

      1. That special friends money has narrowed the cash gap. Norton’s only got 200K more cash on hand than Buck after raising funds like gangbusters. She’s spent a lot on ads and she’s losing!

        1. “Raising money like gangbusters”??? 118K??? That’s pathetic.

          Buck’s got no abilty to raise money. Considering his “loan”, its the only way folks aren’t laughing in his face right now. The only thing keeping him “in the race” is the 527 money someone keeps throwing to any DC group that’s willing to take a check for a month or two of work.

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

128 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!