Notable Links



Denver Internet Marketing by Parallel Path

Arvada Boutique Clothing Store Stella B's

Bennet Throws Down on Republican Obstruction of Education Bill

by: Colorado Pols

Wed Oct 19, 2011 at 16:14:12 PM MDT


From Fox 31:

Those who have criticized Colorado Sen. Michael Bennet for being bland or quiet should take note of his fiery speech Wednesday morning on the floor of the U.S. Senate.

Speaking without notes, Bennet lashed out at Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul for stalling the Elementary and Secondary Education Act, the legislation Bennet has helped mold that will re-write the Bush era education law, "No Child Left Behind"...

...Only four amendments were considered during Wednesday's two-hour mark-up session, which ended when Paul blocked a motion to continue the meeting. Senate rules limit committee meetings to two hours while the Senate is in session, a rule that's often broken when senators agree. But the objection from any one senator is enough to enforce the two-hour rule.

Bennet, a former Denver Public Schools superintendent, took to the Senate floor and with maybe a half dozen senators, including Paul, in the chamber, lashed out.

"Sen. [Paul] speaks of the tragedy of this process," Bennet said. "I'll tell you what a tragedy is: the tragedy is that only nine of 100 children living in poverty in this country in 2011 can expect to get a college degree. That's a tragedy.

"It's a tragedy that there are people working in our schools right now doing the best they can to serve our kids and we think a two-hour meeting is too long. That's a tragedy."

Poll after poll after poll shows that Americans are angry at Congress, which they perceive to be a body that generally doesn't do much. And time after time recently, Republicans have done their very best to reinforce that negative image. Something's gotta give here eventually.

Colorado Pols :: Bennet Throws Down on Republican Obstruction of Education Bill
Tags: , , (All Tags)


Instead of Pols agit-prop...
Here's Senator Paul himself. He's quite reasonable if you listen instead of partisan knee jerking.



"This was a dumb, dumb move by the Dems" - Aristotle


They're all so reasonable when they're on TV.
Try harder.

Will ArapaGOP rescind his factually incorrect assertion regarding Rep. Coram and his son?

[ Parent ]
No thanks.
And what does Occupy Wall Street have to do with this diary? Are you lost, Arapa?

"I wouldn't characterize caloric intake as "professional development." c rork

[ Parent ]
Why don't you watch it and see?
Because your comment proves you did not. He talks about No Child Left Behind first and for longer than Occupy Wall Street.

But if you're curious, I love what he said about them. Especially the part about how the Tea Party takes a bath afterwards.

"This was a dumb, dumb move by the Dems" - Aristotle


[ Parent ]
Yo, genius.
Yes, my comment proves I didn't watch it because I wrote that I wasn't going to watch it.

Did you not read the part in the subject line that said "No thanks"? Good Lord. No wonder people have stopped replying to you. You make half wits look brilliant.  

"I wouldn't characterize caloric intake as "professional development." c rork


[ Parent ]
Is it possible that the Wilson has moved south?


[ Parent ]
That's just the latest talking point.
Already seen it elsewhere. You guys really are of a hive mind, aren't you? (But without the ability to accomplish anything useful, unlike real hives.)

Will ArapaGOP rescind his factually incorrect assertion regarding Rep. Coram and his son?

[ Parent ]
Well,
I think Republicans do have a good sense of smell.

"This was a dumb, dumb move by the Dems" - Aristotle

[ Parent ]
I doubt it.
All those perfumed detergents and plug-in deodorizers used by uptight 'pubs are proven to dull the sense of smell.

Will ArapaGOP rescind his factually incorrect assertion regarding Rep. Coram and his son?

[ Parent ]
We would not need them,
If these damned Occupiers would take a bath.

"This was a dumb, dumb move by the Dems" - Aristotle

[ Parent ]
How quaint!
A dirty unwashed hippy remark.  What's next. "Sock it to me"?  

[ Parent ]
Vote Romney! 23-skiddoo! n/t


I demand that all students get As, that all our oil comes from American soil, that waste and fraud be eliminated forever, and that potato chips stop making me fat!

[ Parent ]
Hey, even I
am not that old!

[ Parent ]
you mean...
Rand Paul knows how to grandstand on TV? But when it comes to actually DOING something productive, he's unable to work for more than two hours?

Thanks for driving home the point.  

Terrorists, children and the GOP do not negotiate in good faith.
by: WitnessProtectionForGeeks @ Tue Jul 19, 2011 at 10:18:53 AM MDT


[ Parent ]
Reasonable
except for the parts where he says
"Heritage Foundation"
"Eliminate the Department of Education"
"Obama-care"
"Tea partiers were responsible, clean", etc. (Clearly ArapaGOP, you didn't meet the wife-beater-t-shirt wearing, gun-brandishing, hairy, toothless people shouting "Obama is a socialist" that I did in '09. Sure, there were a handful who spelled the words on their signs correctly, but many were also clearly on the fringe.)

Let's get Joe Miklosi elected in CD6. http://www.joemiklosi.com/inde...

[ Parent ]
Don't be dense.
When R's associate with fringey loons, or aqua Buddha worshipping kids, no harm no foul because that's not the point.

But when fringey loons are associated with D's - well, that's proof positive that D's are crazy and hate America.


[ Parent ]
Jr. is a moron
This idea that they just got a huge bill without knowing what's in it is absurd. The discussions about reauthorizing NCLB have been going on for years. If Sen. Paul doesn't know what's in the bill then it just shows how terrible a Senator he is. Clearly he doesn't pay attention to what's going on in his supposed areas of expertise.

Jr. is playing on the fact that people are unfamiliar with the process of passing federal education policy. No Child Left Behind is the catchy name that President Bush and Ted Kennedy gave to the Elementary and Secondary Education Act, which has been reauthorized every few years since the 1960s.

So, reauthorizing NCLB does not mean maintaining the status quo. It is what's necessary to get rid of the bad parts of No Child Left Behind. Arapa, it's sad that you can't think for yourself and instead fall for the PR obstructionist stunt that Jr. is pulling.  


[ Parent ]
Bennet arguing with a Republican on education policy
is about as credible as Wile E. Coyote claiming to support a "Roadrunner Protection Act."

"I don't have to pretend to be ignorant." -- MADCO, Oct. 20, 2011

And as about as credible
As you knowing what the fuck you are talking about.

This is serious, you commie dolt  --davebarnes, 2012.

[ Parent ]
Dickhead.


"I don't have to pretend to be ignorant." -- MADCO, Oct. 20, 2011

[ Parent ]
A badge of honor
I wear it proudly.

This is serious, you commie dolt  --davebarnes, 2012.

[ Parent ]
It blends nicely with the rest of your appearance.


"I don't have to pretend to be ignorant." -- MADCO, Oct. 20, 2011

[ Parent ]
Which you would know how?
You gonna out me Michael?  Go for it.

This is serious, you commie dolt  --davebarnes, 2012.

[ Parent ]
I've seen you in the funny papers.


"I don't have to pretend to be ignorant." -- MADCO, Oct. 20, 2011

[ Parent ]
You probably ought to work on the whole concept of analogy
"arguing with" and "claiming to support" make no sense together in this one.  Bennet supporting a Republican education plan and Wile E Coyote supporting A Road Runner Protection Act would have been just as stupid but would at least have given your non sequitur the structure of an analogy.

[ Parent ]
Dickhead.


"I don't have to pretend to be ignorant." -- MADCO, Oct. 20, 2011

[ Parent ]
Wow. Someone sent the best and brightest.
Cogent use of a middle school insult there.  

"There are a lot of reasons not to elect me." Mitt Romney in a moment of clarity

"I'm Mitt Romney and yes, Wolf, that's also my first name," Willard Mitt Romney demonstrating 'policy flexibility.'  


[ Parent ]
To say "A" is as credible as "B"
does not imply parallelism. It merely compares the degree to which the two concepts are credible. You have no clue what you're talking about. You dickhead.

"I don't have to pretend to be ignorant." -- MADCO, Oct. 20, 2011

[ Parent ]
So you're saying that the idea of Bennet arguing with
a Republican on education policy is one we should not find credible? I suppose that means you think it's obvious that he would not argue but agree with a Republican on education policy?  You're confused, dear. No wonder you can't do any better than resort to "dickhead".  

[ Parent ]
What part are you having trouble understanding?
Because of his long history of supporting policies that harm public education -- policies that are typically identified with the Republican agenda -- Michael Bennet has no credibility when posing as a champion of education and pretending to disagree with Republicans over education policy.

Are you going to be requiring the Cliffs Notes version of everything from here on out?  

"I don't have to pretend to be ignorant." -- MADCO, Oct. 20, 2011


[ Parent ]
You forgot to say...
Dickhead.

"A popular government without popular information, or the means of acquiring it, is but a Prologue to a Farce or a Tragedy, or, perhaps, both."  James Madison

[ Parent ]
First, that may be what you meant but isn't what
your words say within the bounds of cogency provided by the rules of grammar. Second, that he has harmed public education and that any generic Republican has more credibility on education is your personal opinion, not something that works in an analogy because almost any reader could be assumed to be as familiar with the workings of your not at all famous mind or a not at all universal opinion as they are with Wile E Coyote and Roadrunner. And, yes, you forgot "Dickhead".    

[ Parent ]
Apparently you don't know what "grammar" means either.
You may disagree with the opinion I expressed or the literary device by which I expressed it, but that certainly is not an issue of grammar.

This is a political blog. I expressed a political opinion that you disagree with. You (and Ralphie) were unable to construct a credible counter-argument, so you resorted to personal insult instead. So I smacked you back to teach you a lesson. Get over it.

And for future reference, since you don't even know what the words "analogy" and "grammar" mean, perhaps you shouldn't be trying to invoke those concepts in your petty personal attacks on fellow posters.

"I don't have to pretend to be ignorant." -- MADCO, Oct. 20, 2011


[ Parent ]
And apparently you are an ignorant, humorless pissant
with a grumpy temperament. Grumpiness is so much more tolerable, even endearing in a perverse way, in those who know what the hell they're talking about and deliver with a dash of curmudgeonly wit, like Ralphie, for instance.

[ Parent ]
Dickhead.


"I don't have to pretend to be ignorant." -- MADCO, Oct. 20, 2011

[ Parent ]
Yeah, you seem like a barrel of laughs there, BlueCat.
I can just see you now. A friend tells you:

"I went out on a dinner date the other night, and I was as nervous as a long-tailed cat in a room full of rocking chairs."
(Which is a simple simile, not an analogy, by the way.)

And you respond:
"That analogy doesn't make any sense! Which part of your body corresponds to the cat's tail? Which piece of furniture corresponds to the rocking chair? Are you referring to the booth you were sitting at in the restaurant? Were you afraid the booth would rock and crush your foot? This whole analogy is so ungrammatical! There, I've just proven that you weren't really nervous on your date!"

"I don't have to pretend to be ignorant." -- MADCO, Oct. 20, 2011


[ Parent ]
Hey, that's really excessive, and BlueCat doesn't deserve it.
She's one of the best and most consistent commenters here. Let's not start burning perfectly good bridges because of old sore spots.

Furthermore, I just looked on three university websites and none explicitly states that a simile cannot also be an analogy. In fact, my fourth source actually gives a simile as their example of an analogy. Like a square is also a rectangle, an analogy can also be a simile.

There once was a speaker named Frank
Asked to vote his conscience, he drew a blank
Bet it all to kill just one bill
Now, here's the word on the Hill:
This fall, Dems have the House in the tank.


[ Parent ]
More like...
... "Like a square is also a rectangle, a simile can also be an analogy."

Sorry, couldn't resist. :)

Will ArapaGOP rescind his factually incorrect assertion regarding Rep. Coram and his son?


[ Parent ]
Here's something for you Ari

Should make that nit-picking easier ;)

There once was a speaker named Frank
Asked to vote his conscience, he drew a blank
Bet it all to kill just one bill
Now, here's the word on the Hill:
This fall, Dems have the House in the tank.


[ Parent ]
Logic fail.
The fact that a simile can be constructed in the form of analogy does not mean that all similes must be analogies. Cars can be Fords, therefore all cars must be Fords, and any car that is not a Ford is not a valid car?

As far as your claim that my comment was "really excessive," why don't you try looking at BlueCat's comment to which I was responding and ask yourself honestly whether my response was disproportionate.

Look, the only time I get snappy is when people attack me first. I reserve the right to practice self-defense. Don't like it? Tough.

"I don't have to pretend to be ignorant." -- MADCO, Oct. 20, 2011


[ Parent ]
She attacked the construction of your argument
I think it's out of line to respond with an ad hominem rather than in kind with an attack on her argument.

And I freaking HATE how every mention of Bennet turns people who should be allies against each other. Primary him again in 2016 if he's so irritating, but does there have to be a Democrat on Democrat bloodbath EVERY time he does something worth commenting on?

There once was a speaker named Frank
Asked to vote his conscience, he drew a blank
Bet it all to kill just one bill
Now, here's the word on the Hill:
This fall, Dems have the House in the tank.


[ Parent ]
Look,
I will continue to express my dissatisfaction with Michael Bennet's performance in office and the un-democratic means by which he obtained that office. There are rabid assholes who jump all over people like me for expressing that dissatisfaction. These rabid assholes are the people to blame for the "Democrat on Democrat bloodbaths" that you lament. I will not let them bully me into acquiescing to their bullshit. Don't want a bloodbath? Then don't draw the first blood.

"I don't have to pretend to be ignorant." -- MADCO, Oct. 20, 2011

[ Parent ]
...but the first "blood" was innocuous praise for him doing something good.
You didn't have to make it about your personal feelings on Bennet. Hell, I hate Herman Cain in ways that make me actually use the word "hate" toward a person, which I NEVER do, and I can say he made a good statement on abortion, even though it was eclipsed by his ignorant statement on homosexuality.

There once was a speaker named Frank
Asked to vote his conscience, he drew a blank
Bet it all to kill just one bill
Now, here's the word on the Hill:
This fall, Dems have the House in the tank.


[ Parent ]
I believe there's a contingent of people
who believe that Pols was a cog in the Democratic machine that steamrolled over Romanoff and brought Bennet to the Senate. As such, they perceive any praise from this site to be salt in the unhealed wounds from the primary. (I don't endorse that viewpoint, but I think I understand it.)

Will ArapaGOP rescind his factually incorrect assertion regarding Rep. Coram and his son?

[ Parent ]
Hmm, I guess that makes sense.
If so, fair enough I suppose, but are they supposed to just ignore it when he makes national headlines? I've seen the same story all over FB today from various outlets.

There once was a speaker named Frank
Asked to vote his conscience, he drew a blank
Bet it all to kill just one bill
Now, here's the word on the Hill:
This fall, Dems have the House in the tank.


[ Parent ]
Those other media outlets didn't betray them.
Pols did. At least, that's the collective feeling I gather when I read their comments at other blogs.

Will ArapaGOP rescind his factually incorrect assertion regarding Rep. Coram and his son?

[ Parent ]
Dear Cowgirl
Please don't waste your time on this on my account.  I couldn't care less what the pissant thinks or says about or calls me.  First I would have to have an iota of regard for the source.

And if you carefully examine his post what he says is Bennet arguing with a Republican about X is no more credible than  etc. etc. That would mean it's not credible that Bennet would argue with a Republican about it.

Could mean it's not credible because Bennet, for some reason, is well known not to argue  Could mean that it isn't credible because everyone knows Bennet agrees with Republicans on the subject. So simile, analogy, whatever, the words as written simply don't mean what pissant thinks they mean. I will now be happy to let pissant have the last word.  This passed boring long ago. I apologize for my role in the tedium.  


[ Parent ]
Hmmm....
I don't know that opinions, when they're expressed in such absolute terms, are entitled to "credible counter-arguments." It certainly didn't sound like you were soliciting for any.

Will ArapaGOP rescind his factually incorrect assertion regarding Rep. Coram and his son?

[ Parent ]
Who said I was soliciting any counter-argument?
I was stating a political opinion on a political blog. People are free to agree or disagree.  

"I don't have to pretend to be ignorant." -- MADCO, Oct. 20, 2011

[ Parent ]
Something about Wile E Coyote, was it?
Was I supposed to present a credible counter argument in a Wile E Coyote v Roadrunner debate? Well, you have me there.    

[ Parent ]
If you weren't soliciting a counter-argument,
then why are you complaining about getting none?

You (and Ralphie) were unable to construct a credible counter-argument...

When you begin sentences this way, the implication is that you expect rational discourse to follow your comments. And if "people are free to agree or disagree," then getting into pissing matches implies that you don't really believe that. People who believe that leave insulting replies unanswered.

Things can quickly deteriorate to a middle-school level here. But you can't be a willing participant in that as well as someone who complains about it. I advise you to make up your mind about how you're going to engage us here. And remember, if someone decides to give you shit, it's still your choice if you take it.

Will ArapaGOP rescind his factually incorrect assertion regarding Rep. Coram and his son?


[ Parent ]
That doesn't mean I was soliciting one.
It just means that they didn't provide one.

But more important, why are you continuing to flog this insipid point of dispute that you raised? Why don't you take your own advice and drop it? Why did you interject yourself into this in the first place?

"I don't have to pretend to be ignorant." -- MADCO, Oct. 20, 2011


[ Parent ]
Why?
Because I'm enjoying myself. You don't seem to be, and I'm trying to help, but maybe I'm misinterpreting your angry-sounding and insulting posts, and you're actually having fun, too.

Will ArapaGOP rescind his factually incorrect assertion regarding Rep. Coram and his son?

[ Parent ]
I am not a Senator Bennet's #1 fan
But he probably knows education policy better than any other Senator in D.C. And he's coming from the point of view of what has been shown to work, not wishful thinking based on obsolete philosophies.

If you want to disagree on some specific point, go crazy. But on a blanket ad hominem attack, that just shows that you have nothing.

No trees were destroyed in the posting of this comment. But a large number of electrons were horribly inconvenienced.


[ Parent ]
Shall I respond for Mikey and save him the trouble?
Dickhead!

[ Parent ]
I think you need to make that your signature
a la Ralphie

There once was a speaker named Frank
Asked to vote his conscience, he drew a blank
Bet it all to kill just one bill
Now, here's the word on the Hill:
This fall, Dems have the House in the tank.


[ Parent ]
David's not a dickhead,
but he's spouting dickishness in this instance.  

"I don't have to pretend to be ignorant." -- MADCO, Oct. 20, 2011

[ Parent ]
David, teaching is not an "obsolete philosophy."
Please provide real evidence that rigid standardized testing and the scapegoating of teachers are methods that have been "shown to work." Do you have actual data to support this belief?  

"I don't have to pretend to be ignorant." -- MADCO, Oct. 20, 2011

[ Parent ]
And by extension, someone someone somewhere is anti-teaching, pro rigid testing and scapegoating teachers?
Who would that be?

[ Parent ]
Well said
It's easier to construct a straw man than speak to the actual facts. So they make claims about Bennet that are not true.

No trees were destroyed in the posting of this comment. But a large number of electrons were horribly inconvenienced.

[ Parent ]
"Actual facts," David?
Did you not read this? Here's an excerpt:
Senator Michael Bennet, DFER "Reformer of the Month" and recipient of nearly $500,000 in DFER campaign contributions, is sponsoring the GREAT Act, which calls for taxpayer dollars to fund private revenue generating alternative certification models.
-- Angela Engel

Do you deny any of that?

When are you going to provide data supporting your contention that the education "reform" policies that you support actually improve public school systems and communities and the lives of our kids? Fact is, if you take an honest look at the real data, you'll discover that the opposite is true: that these so-called reform" schemes are causing great harm while sucking scarce resources out of our public schools and transferring that wealth to Wall Street robber barons.



"I don't have to pretend to be ignorant." -- MADCO, Oct. 20, 2011


[ Parent ]
Where are you going to provide proof these approaches fail?
And what's wrong with alternative certification models? One of my daughters went to a private middle school and had a superb teacher. He does not have a teaching certificate.

And what's wrong with his gaining the support of DFER? The entire purpose of DFER is to improve our public schools. (No I am not a member of DFER.)

No trees were destroyed in the posting of this comment. But a large number of electrons were horribly inconvenienced.


[ Parent ]
That's always the response from the "reformers":
It's always some anecdotal, cherry-picked assertion:

One of my daughters went to a private middle school and had a superb teacher. He does not have a teaching certificate.

That was the deceptive device that was used again and again in "Waiting for Superman." Of course you can name some kids who are doing better under "reform." But how is "reform" impacting the rest of the kids? Overall, they are demonstrably worse off.

And this:

The entire purpose of DFER is to improve our public schools.

Um, no, that is its stated purpose.  

"I don't have to pretend to be ignorant." -- MADCO, Oct. 20, 2011

[ Parent ]
And the response from the unhinged is always
Something that sounds, to me, like

No matter what the candidate I oppose says or does I know if their heart they are pure evil.  

Only my candidate is good, all others must--by definition of not being my candidate--support all that is bad and wrong with the world.  

Even if my candidate loses by 8 points I know that it can only be becasue the other guy cheated, somehow in spite of any absence of proof--an unsupported grudge I will carry all my life and use it to flog mercilessly (if not somewhat crazy-like) any and all politicians with whom I subsequently disagree.

Such obsessive crazy-looking tactics help my candidates, because if there is one thing we know--Colorado loves to vote for crazy.



"There are a lot of reasons not to elect me." Mitt Romney in a moment of clarity

"I'm Mitt Romney and yes, Wolf, that's also my first name," Willard Mitt Romney demonstrating 'policy flexibility.'  


[ Parent ]
And that's why your name is "Twitty."


"I don't have to pretend to be ignorant." -- MADCO, Oct. 20, 2011

[ Parent ]
Beautifully put


No trees were destroyed in the posting of this comment. But a large number of electrons were horribly inconvenienced.

[ Parent ]
Gee, David,
Just a few posts ago, you claimed to not like strawman arguments.

"I don't have to pretend to be ignorant." -- MADCO, Oct. 20, 2011

[ Parent ]
You need to understand the difference between an observation and an argument
I made one but not the other.  I stand by my impression of what you sound like to me...

A bitter person with no tactical sense.  But please carry on.  I'm sure Anne is glad that you are...

"There are a lot of reasons not to elect me." Mitt Romney in a moment of clarity

"I'm Mitt Romney and yes, Wolf, that's also my first name," Willard Mitt Romney demonstrating 'policy flexibility.'  


[ Parent ]
You're the one hurling insults
instead of engaging in substantive debate, pal.  

"I don't have to pretend to be ignorant." -- MADCO, Oct. 20, 2011

[ Parent ]
Let me quote you then
dickhead

Very substantive there, 'pal.'

I will add a lack of self-perception to my observed impression of you.  

"There are a lot of reasons not to elect me." Mitt Romney in a moment of clarity

"I'm Mitt Romney and yes, Wolf, that's also my first name," Willard Mitt Romney demonstrating 'policy flexibility.'  


[ Parent ]
More out-of-context cherry-picking.
Look at the context of what I was responding to.  When you and others launch third-grade-level attacks at me without provocation, I reserve the right to toss your own shit back in your face. If you don't like it,  don't start it.  

"I don't have to pretend to be ignorant." -- MADCO, Oct. 20, 2011

[ Parent ]
I hope your health care plan
covers that sort of thing.

"There are a lot of reasons not to elect me." Mitt Romney in a moment of clarity

"I'm Mitt Romney and yes, Wolf, that's also my first name," Willard Mitt Romney demonstrating 'policy flexibility.'  


[ Parent ]
I would vote against it
1900 pages.
Jesus Fucking Christ.
How about a 5-page bill?

Go write a children's book,
and leave the complicated stuff to adults.

Exercise your right to peaceably assemble and reclaim the commons. Stop the militarization of America.

[ Parent ]
Very "conservative" phrasing there:
Jesus Fucking Christ.


"I don't have to pretend to be ignorant." -- MADCO, Oct. 20, 2011

[ Parent ]
HULK HATE READING! HULK SMASH BILL!!
Hulk think everything easy! Hulk hate anything complex!

Will ArapaGOP rescind his factually incorrect assertion regarding Rep. Coram and his son?

[ Parent ]
Well, hey
Isn't that one of the things Bachmann or one of the other genius joke candidates is claiming they can do once they're President? In any case, If Bachmann thinks she can reduce the price of gasoline to $2 a gallon (by decree?), I'm sure she'd be happy to wave her magic presidential wand over the length of bills, too.  And a unicorn under every Christmas tree.

[ Parent ]
Unicorns?!?!?
BACHMANN FOR PRESIDENT

There once was a speaker named Frank
Asked to vote his conscience, he drew a blank
Bet it all to kill just one bill
Now, here's the word on the Hill:
This fall, Dems have the House in the tank.


[ Parent ]
ESEA is the entire federal K-12 education policy
The bill is so large because it includes EVERY federal K-12 education policy. That includes programs and funding for special needs students, programs and funding for low income students like free and reduced price lunch, literacy programs for children, accountability standards like measuring student achievement, and much more.

I would be fine getting rid of the US Department of Education if I was confident that every state would provide an adequate education to children. But there is no way states can afford to provide educational services for special needs students, or healthy free and reduced-price meals for kids who would otherwise have nothing to eat.  


[ Parent ]
Why do you want to make things so complicated?
Anyone with a childish simplistic view of the world can see that no bill should be over 3 pages

No trees were destroyed in the posting of this comment. But a large number of electrons were horribly inconvenienced.

[ Parent ]
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?







Advertise Here!
ads@coloradopols.com


Active Users
Currently 3 user(s) logged on.

Search




Advanced Search



Colorado Pols Network


Jeffco Pols
  More >

Denver Pols
  More >











RSS 2.0



Pols Gets Mobile: ColoradoPols.com/mobile/

Colorado Pols is on Twitter: twitter.com/coloradopols

Email Pols


How to Write a Diary That Will Make the Front Page



Terms of Use/Privacy Policy



Pols Posting Policies



The Pols Penalty Box



Yard Signs!



The Pols "Mailbag"

Mailbag #1

Relevant Links

The Bell Policy Center

The Big Media Blog

Blog It Right

Blog For Growth

Blogometer

Business Word

Colorado Capitol Journal

Colorado Center on Law and Policy

Colorado Democratic Party

Colorado Ethics Watch

Colorado Independent

Colorado Labor Blog

Colorado Veterans for America

Colorado Legislature

Colorado Lib

Colorado Libertarian Blog

Colorado Media Matters

Colorado Progressive Coalition

Colorado Republican Party

Colorado Secretary of State

Colorado Senate Dems

Colorado Senate GOP

Colorado Young Democrats

Commentary Today

Coyote Gulch

CU Democrats

Curious Stranger

Daily Kos

Dan Willis-Rumors

Dem Notes

Democracy for Colorado

Denver Politics

East Boulder County Politics

Ed Stein Ink

Election Neutrality Now

eleXn

George in Denver

Great Education Colorado

Head First Colorado

The Hotline Political Network

Junction Daily Blog

Left in the West

Liberal and Loving It

Maintain Educational Standards in Colorado

Mount Virtus

MyDD

National Journal

On Call

Peak Dems

Political State Report

Progress Now

Prometheus

Project Vote Smart

Radio Free Denver

Senate Guru

Slapstick Politics

Steam Powered Opinions

Square State

Stygius

TalkLeft

The Thicket

The Hypothetical Wren

ThomasMC.com

Toilet Paper Online

TRACER Campaign Finance

View From a Height

Walter in Denver

Wash Park Prophet

Western Democrat


Colorado Pols is wholly owned by Colorado Pols, LLC
webmaster-at-coloradopols.com

Powered by: SoapBlox