Notable Links



Denver Internet Marketing by Parallel Path

Arvada Boutique Clothing Store Stella B's

Legal Threat Gets More Bizarre: Attorney Admits They Have No Claim

by: Colorado Pols

Fri Jul 09, 2010 at 09:50:32 AM MDT


We think today's story from the Colorado Statesman's Ernest Luning offers the most comprehensive look at our recent dispute with a number of Colorado newspapers that's been written so far. We'll add a couple of fine points, make sure you read it all, but there are a few parts that really jump out -- like the newspaper group's attorney saying that their legal threats actually aren't all that valid:

[Beall] acknowledged his clients can't force Colorado Pols to stop using its content altogether but said he issued the blanket demand because the website's editors were so frequently straying so far out of bounds. [Pols emphasis]...

..."My clients cannot insist someone stop engaging in fair use," Beall said [Pols emphasis]. "So Colorado Pols is entitled to engage in fair use of our newspapers' content. The easiest course to avoid a dispute is to not engage in any copying, because then you don't have to figure out whether the use is a fair use."

He said the news organizations singled out Colorado Pols - and haven't sent similar demands to any other blogs or websites - because no one else quoted from his clients' articles so extensively.

Still, he emphasized, "Colorado Pols has a right under the Copyright Act to engage in fair use." [Pols emphasis]

If the news organizations just wanted the website to post briefer excerpts and be sure to add some commentary, why initiate the discussion with such a hard-line stance? Beall said confusion about the law required hitting hard out of the gate.

"The position we stake out is, if you want to be sure you're not infringing, don't engage in any literal copying," he said. "Go forth and make merry, but don't engage in literal copying of the heart of the news coverage we create."

The website doesn't need to shut out the newspapers Beall represents, he said...

This admission that the newspapers took such a "hard-line stance," knowing that they were legally wrong, is frankly an incredible statement. And it stands in stark contrast to statements from attorney Christopher Beall yesterday to Westword's Michael Roberts, where he made vague reference to a "gentleman's agreement" to not directly quote "more than two paragraphs" of The Denver Post--an assertion repeated in today's Denver Daily News.

We have no idea what Beall is talking about regarding this "gentleman's agreement." We never had any such agreement with the Post or anyone else--but we do agree that the position Beall "staked out" in this letter is not legally defensible. And it's nice of Beall to admit to readers that we don't have to comply with his threatening letter, and perhaps some recognition that maybe this was a bad idea in noting that we're not obligated to "shut out" the newspapers who signed on, but he's only reinforcing our point by admitting this: we have absolutely nothing to gain by putting ourselves at risk citing the work of organizations who threaten us, and make demands far beyond their legal rights.

On the other side, as the Statesman's Luning continues, are more reasonable voices in the print media, who understand blogs and find ways to benefit. You may have noticed that there are a number of newspapers who did not join MediaNews' case-and-desist letter--Luning spoke with a couple of them, one of whom you'll recognize:

Colorado Pols :: Legal Threat Gets More Bizarre: Attorney Admits They Have No Claim
A newspaper editor who was approached to join the complaint against Colorado Pols but declined - and who frequently posts links to his own breaking news on the website - said both sides went to the barricades too hastily.

"I do think there's a middle ground if people just take a deep breath," said Fort Collins Coloradoan executive editor Bob Moore.

He said he sympathizes with the owners of the aggrieved newspapers but also realizes the importance of inserting political stories into the online community.

"We really have not had that kind of problem with Colorado Pols," Moore said, noting that his own efforts to promote Coloradoan stories on the website have helped increase his reputation among political observers statewide [Pols emphasis]...

Moore isn't the only editor of a Colorado newspaper who sees the benefit of connecting their stories with Colorado Pols.

An executive at another newspaper - whose political coverage has already gotten a boost from Colorado Pols' stance [Pols emphasis] - said he declined to sign on with the cease-and-desist letter from the other news organizations but understood why they sent it.

"We probably would have been part of this effort had we seen a clearer abuse of our intellectual property rights by Colorado Pols," said Grand Junction Daily Sentinel publisher Jay Seaton...

While Seaton acknowledged he was happy the newspaper's political reporting got more attention when Colorado Pols featured it, the publisher cautioned the website against taking his stance as a license to go hog wild. "If that happens, we will pursue a remedy against them," he said.

This is a good opportunity to clear the air on this subject, which we'll add is a lot easier to do with people who are willing to make reasonable requests--not unreasonable demands.

We've frequently cited the Coloradoan's Bob Moore, as well as our online partners at The Washington Post and Hotline, as examples of the way that traditional journalists should work with blogs. Traditional media organizations who participate in that discussion should only benefit from doing so--to the extent that this blog is a hub for dissemination of news from many commercial sources, as well as original reporting and commentary, Bob Moore's stories belong here, and we want them here in a way that benefits all parties.

With the introduction of our new Terms of Use, the method for resolving copyright complaints is clearly defined. In short, we value the relationship we have with the media, and we have no interest in doing anything to jeopardize that. In turn, both Moore and the Grand Junction Sentinel's Jay Seaton acknowledge the value they get in return when their stories are more widely distributed from our blog. That's how it's supposed to work, and for media outlets smart enough get it, it's a recipe for continued success.

Tags: (All Tags)


I think Pols was singled out becuse
1) more readers
2) much more thought put into posts here that at the Denver Pravda.
3) getting the "scoop" a day or two BEFORE the Denver Pravda does.
4) forcing the Denver Pravda to actually do its job and report on the buzz Pols creates.
5)the Denver Pravda is jealous that the posters here can and do use colorful adjectives freely. True Free speech cannot be tolerated.
lastly
6) All of us "leftists" Here at Pols Mocking the Pravda's new found bias towards the dark side, They must QUASH descent.

When in reality it appears the Pravda is beating a dying horse, nothing more.

"Fake but accurate!" ~GOPwarrior "infrastructure,whatever that is." ~bjwilson83 "You leftist DICK!" ~ Laughing Boy
See you at the polls you dumb bastard.~Libertad  


To quibble, Froward...
They [The Post] must QUASH descent.

  Actually, they support descent, as they descend further into the swamp of far-right politics and policies every day.
 It's
dissent
they want to quash.

[ Parent ]
But Voy, what's your solution or a proposed policy?


[ Parent ]
Thanks Voyageur, I Stand corrected... :)
I will take it under advisement, and implement changes immediately.

lets see a republican do that!

"Fake but accurate!" ~GOPwarrior "infrastructure,whatever that is." ~bjwilson83 "You leftist DICK!" ~ Laughing Boy
See you at the polls you dumb bastard.~Libertad  


[ Parent ]
'd be interested in Voy's take here
being that a media mogul funded his grand kids trust funds and bought horsies for his ranch on the backs of reporters and editors labor, what's Voys take.

Heck he's a guest editor, what would his policy be to live within Fair Use, keep moguls trust funding ability and enable CPs to address today's political issues.


[ Parent ]
But Voy, what's your solution or a proposed policy?


[ Parent ]
I have no link to Pols, Libby
since my secret subsidy as FPE is paid directly from Soros [Sorry to nag, Georgie, but it still hasn't been deposited to my off-shore account in Glendale.]
  Seriously, Pols can obviously win a lawsuit based on fair use policies.  But can it afford to?  The Post once spent half a million dollars getting a libel suit thrown out on summary judgment.  Can pols afford that kind of legal bill to score a pyrrhic victory in district court on its way to bankruptcy court?
  This is one reason I favor the British system of "loser pays" in civil suits.
   

[ Parent ]
So that's why you became a FPE....
I had a suspicion all along Soros was behind you, and I now officially retract my vote.

Sad but true what you say about the costs of defending a lawsuit. But there might be the possibility of pro bono work being done since this would be a precedent setting case, and as I stated below a legal defense fund could be set up.

If Dan Maes can raise $ 50,000 just for "drive around money", would this be impossible?


"Fuck it, let machines do the work"   plank in the Yippie Party platform, 1968


[ Parent ]
Ha!!!
"Drive around money" is fantastic!

[ Parent ]
A protracted legal fight would indeed be a pain in the ass
But our bigger point in all of this has been that we have no need to challenge this in court. As we've said, it's no big deal for us to stop using content from the Post or these other newspapers. The success of Colorado Pols will have nothing to do with whether or not we use content from these newspapers, so it's not a fight worth waging in our minds.

We could go through a long legal fight and "win," but for what? To get a court's affirmation that we can use content that we don't really need anyway?


[ Parent ]
Are you saying you can't afford
to buy a first-class cabin on the Titanic?

[ Parent ]
Sort of
At least the Titanic offered the prospect of a nice boat for a while. This would be like betting the deed to your house in a wager to win a new kitchen table. We could go through a whole legal battle to win something we don't even really want.

[ Parent ]
Are you saying you have no solution to a sound policy
I know you're only a guest editor, but your expertise is journalism, not the promotion of an assumed judicial outcome.

Your life's work has been used by media moguls to fund their grand kids trustfunds, although they invested the capital to enable you to practice your trade.

Don't you have a proposed solution you can recommend to CPs and the Denver Post - a gentlemans agreement if you will?


[ Parent ]
Good point Voy
right now things are so tight, I'd probably get thrown out of the lifeboat.  

"Fuck it, let machines do the work"   plank in the Yippie Party platform, 1968

[ Parent ]
At the end of the day you're right Pols
If Pols would win, it really means nothing because we don't need the Post et al.

And if Dinky wins, it means nothing to the Post et al because that doesn't remedy their real problem.

But the litigator in me just screams "Bring It On !!

"Fuck it, let machines do the work"   plank in the Yippie Party platform, 1968


[ Parent ]
CPs won't win, nor will the Post because there won't be a case
What's the solution besides forbidding links to the Denver Post, other complaintents or posting sections of their material?

[ Parent ]
There is no solution Libertad
Now shut the fuck up for Christ sakes

" I will always put Colorado families before the Washington special interests"

Cory Gardner (R-O&G)


[ Parent ]
Fidel, you certainly seem emotionally charged up today
Is it that time of the year or are your favorite causes beinging to circle the drain?

[ Parent ]
Don't take the bait
All of a sudden now that you're not linking to them or quoting them they want to remind you that you can link to them under fair use. They're worried that they're losing traffic from Colorado Pols, which they are.

"...energy shouldn't be in the market." - Aristotle

Nonsense
There's a win-win scenario unfolding here. ColoradoPols is a gathering spot for people who want to learn about and discuss Colorado political issues. The greater the breadth of information sources, the better the discussion. There's no question that Pols can link to and quote some degree of information from other media sources under fair use; the only real debate is over what constitutes "too much" when it comes to quoting. I think a "summarize, link, discuss" approach works well. See my diary today on the 4th Congressional District race. I summarized the content of my Coloradoan story, provided a link and started a discussion. A number of posters have followed. It's clear from the discussion that some readers followed the link and used information that was in the story but not in the diary to add to the discussion.

[ Parent ]
Comment on news without using direct quotes
Bob Moore is showing how to comment on the work of himself and others.

The Denver Post is making a big deal out of its favorite fall guy, Tom Tancredo, who's forced the paper to pay attention to him again. The Post doesn't explore the merits of Tancredo's comments, it just issues a standard snear.

That makes Tancredo look human and the Post look snide.

Tancredo could have been more diplomatic, but that wouldn't have started the discussion he wants us to have. Ironically, we're still not having that discussion.

Why?


[ Parent ]
Hi!
See you're still deluded as ever. Poor Tom Tancredo. His claim that Obama is worse than nuclear war just isn't being explored for its merits. Because it's not so fucked up that we can just dismiss it as nuts, amirite?

Dream on. Even LB knows this guy is a fruitcake. Only the deluded hard right wingnut thinks otherwise.

Will ArapaGOP rescind his factually incorrect assertion regarding Rep. Coram and his son?


[ Parent ]
BTW...
I can't figure out which word you mispelled, "smear" or "sneer." Which did you mean? I think "smear."

Will ArapaGOP rescind his factually incorrect assertion regarding Rep. Coram and his son?

[ Parent ]
Wrong as usual
Sneer.

Good catch. :)


[ Parent ]
I didn't vote because there wasn't a "none of the above" category
I think the real reason Dinky initiated his strong arm tactics is out of displaced  aggression and frustration in continuing to lose money in a "unsustainable business model". As I said before, his problem isn't on the content end of the business (other than the quality of his content degrading), but on the revenue end. His action will do nothing to staunch his flow of red ink, but may very well accelerate it.

Several years ago I published a website exposing a criminal developer doing a large real estate project in the Denver area. They sent me a "cease and desist" letter (I told them to go fuck themselves). They threatened to sue me (I told them go right ahead, I'd see them in court.)  They even threatened me with criminal prosecution under the statutory criminal liable and slander laws (I told them to have a DA present me with the charging documents).

Their threats were just that, because when I invited them to carry through on their threats, they did nothing.

My stance would be bring it on Dinky, I'll see ya in court. But this isn't my blog so it's not my decision. But I'd be willing to contribute to a Pols legal defense fund. Just put up a PayPal Donate button on Pols for that purpose.

Stand up to Dinky and I bet his face turns as red as his P & L sheet.  

"Fuck it, let machines do the work"   plank in the Yippie Party platform, 1968


Let's talk about fair use
Say Mr. Pols hires a bunch of engineers and musicians to record a new album. Some of his songs turn out to be popular.

Is it fair use for me to build my own business around long samples of your songs, without your permission and without paying you royalties?

What if Mr. Pols produced movies? Could I build my business replaying long segments of those films without your permission?

Where's the line between fair use and stealing?


It's a pretty broad definition
Added commentary, satire, size of quote, content of quote all go in to it.

If CP were to quote 5 paragraphs of a DP story, three of which were direct quotes from a politician's press release or rally speech, is that "fair use" under the DP's supposed 2 paragraph rule?

If CP adds their own analysis, does it alter how much they can post of a story so that the proper context is provided?

Or perhaps they're quoting long portions of an editorial in order to satirize it.

All of these are allowed, where quoting the same amount of text in other contexts would not be.  The courts have ruled that quoting even a sentence or two can be Copyright infringement, if those few words express something highly proprietary; on the other hand, you could quote the entirety of the DP quoting someone's public speech transcript, or long quotes with lots of analysis and those would be considered fair use.

"There's a Romney Rule. The Romney Rule says, let's double down on the tax cuts for the wealthy." -- VP Joe Biden


[ Parent ]
Not very noble or honorable
Pols (and a lot of the posters here) are standing up for the principle of taking someone's work without permission and without paying for it.

Even Republicans don't go that far.


[ Parent ]
This is the wrong argument, Ignatius
Just about every website on the Internet could argue that other websites are "stealing" from them if the quote some of their writing -- or even if they provide just a link. Technically, aren't you "stealing" someone's link if you don't ask them?

But that's not what the Internet is. The whole point of the Internet is to share content and links. We don't quote any website that requires a paid online subscription for their content -- that would be stealing, but that's not what is happening here. We don't excerpt entire articles, either, which would be a completely different argument. And we don't try to pass off someone else's writing as our own -- we always clearly indicate the source and author.


[ Parent ]
No, Ignatius
We're standing up for the principle of "Fair Use."

Google it.

This is serious, you commie dolt  --davebarnes, 2012.


[ Parent ]
"Fair Use" is a two-way street
Sounds like the content owner doesn't believe his property is being used fairly. So why all the butthurt here?

[ Parent ]
Because the content "owner" is asserting protections to which he might not be entitled
And that affects all of us who run commentary sites.

This is serious, you commie dolt  --davebarnes, 2012.

[ Parent ]
Just doesn't seem like it's a big deal to work with, instead of against, the content owner
Pols says not using MSM won't hurt this site. I disagree. Why isn't the Post story about Bennett's intern on the front page here? What about other MSM scoops, like Suthers signing off on the release of a psycho killer? From here on out, will Pols just ignore stories like that because of the source?

To me, the strength of this site ain't the unique content. It's the unique commentators, who (usually) are are lot more fun and knowledgeable than the commenters on the Post site.

Dumping the MSM from Pols just gives us fewer topics to argue about. Boring!  


[ Parent ]
Who needs the Post for that story?
If the Bennet diary posted by Firewalker hadn't been so inflammatory, I'm guessing it would have been promoted already.

As to ignoring stories based on the source, if CP has been sent a cease-and-desist letter from Singleton's lawyers, they have few legal choices.  If the papers had wanted CP sending them traffic based on quotes, they wouldn't have started with a C&D - or at least they shouldn't have.  At this point it's up to the papers to come crawling back, IMHO - it doesn't take other news organizations long to follow up on breaking news in a way that this site can use it without running up against a threatening C&D orbital lawyer strike.

"There's a Romney Rule. The Romney Rule says, let's double down on the tax cuts for the wealthy." -- VP Joe Biden


[ Parent ]
I'd still like to think that Pols and the Post
are like Sam and Diane on Cheers. They'll still end up together, eventually.

[ Parent ]
You won't see much of a difference, Ignatius
Some stories haven't gotten much play this week on Pols because we've (understandably, we hope) been focused on the legal stuff.

And it's also true that once someone writes an inflammatory diary about a topic that gets a bunch of comments, it can make it less important for us to get something up right away.


[ Parent ]
No, actually it's not
Fair Use is a one-way street.  If the content owner objects, they can file suit to challenge the use, but they have to meet the legal burden of proof that the defendant's actions do not meet the Fair Use exemption.  That is their only defense; whining and saying "we don't like that" is not.

As noted above, CP probably would have won such a case, but why bother?  Singleton's fish wrap isn't the only place on the Internet where CP can point their users for more details on a story.  If he doesn't want the hits on his web sites, no need to send CP readers his way.

"There's a Romney Rule. The Romney Rule says, let's double down on the tax cuts for the wealthy." -- VP Joe Biden


[ Parent ]
That's disingenuous at best
It is in the power of Congress to grant Copyright and Patent to promote advances in the Arts and Sciences.  That's a broad power, and Congress has made many changes in it over the years.  Currently, the law governing Fair Use says pretty much what I just quoted, plus a fair bit more that doesn't apply to this situation.  Fair Use is a broad exemption to Copyright, designed to promote the use of Copyright materials in ways expressed by the Constitution.

I'm a content producer - I've said this before.  I sell my photographs (Copyright), and I create application code for my employer (also protected by Copyright).  I'm all for fair Copyright protections, but it is a limited right and shouldn't be abused.  (E.g. I believe that the current Copyright term is ridiculously outside the bounds imagined by the Founding Fathers; a term similar to that of Patents would be more appropriate, and probably a bit too long.)

"There's a Romney Rule. The Romney Rule says, let's double down on the tax cuts for the wealthy." -- VP Joe Biden


[ Parent ]
By this logic...
... then every college student who ever wrote a term paper "stole" material, regardless of whether the properly used endnotes to show their sources - unless they pay.

Will ArapaGOP rescind his factually incorrect assertion regarding Rep. Coram and his son?

[ Parent ]
Excellent analogy
We're going to start using that one, too.

[ Parent ]
Analogy has a few problems:
1. College students, unlike bloggers, aren't lifting other people's writing for personal profit.
2. When I was in college, my grades were docked whenever I ran long, attributed quotes from source material. My professors always demanded independent writing and analysis, not a cut-and-paste job with a few lines added afterward.
3. There's a lot more booze and sex in college than Colorado Pols.

[ Parent ]
Okay - agree on #3
1) Bloggers aren't often lifting work for personal profit.  I don't know if the Dead Guvs make a salary on this gig, but I'm guessing they have other, more profitable pursuits.  And college students are betting their professional life on their papers; if that's not personal profit, I don't know what is.

2) If you're doing papers in certain fields, long quotes are inevitable.  Of course, so is a lot of your own analysis, but if you're just complaining about the length of the quote, then many many college students are indeed guilty and should be sued by the papers.

"There's a Romney Rule. The Romney Rule says, let's double down on the tax cuts for the wealthy." -- VP Joe Biden


[ Parent ]
okay
1) Neither is Colorado Pols. It's not "lifting" when it's being attributed. And all the credible commentary on the legality of this says that it is legal for Pols to quote the articles in the manner that they did.

2) That doesn't mean the comparison doesn't stand. You brought up the issue of compensating the authors of the source material. Cutting and pasting like this just means it's bad term paper writing (or bad blogging, if you will) but not unfair use of said material.

3) Don't be too sure. Have you been to a Pols meetup?  ;-)


Will ArapaGOP rescind his factually incorrect assertion regarding Rep. Coram and his son?


[ Parent ]
3) or watched one of the Russian music videos :)


No trees were destroyed in the posting of this comment. But a large number of electrons were horribly inconvenienced.

[ Parent ]
Good work by the Statesman.
With the newspaper-that-shall-not-be-named taking its ball and going home, it opens up the field for the Colorado Statesman to move in more on Capitol political news.

Sometimes, I guess, you have to let the inner bitch out.


Jay Seaton
The new publisher of the Daily Sentinel has so far been a breath of fresh air after the paper wondered in the wilderness for a period after Mr. Orbanek retired.  

If you're not upset, you haven't been paying attention.  Mike Littwin

I also think the complaint of the Post is bizarre
I subscribe only on Sunday to the print version of the Post. But, everyday, even on Sunday, I open browser windows in the same order. I have a touch of OCD. First comes my email, then my bank, the CoPols, then the Post. I click on links in Pols but also read any articles in the online Post, and most of the editorials, that are of interest to me. My use of Pols has not diminished in any way my use of the Post, only enhanced it.

Not only that...
Newspapers are struggling to find ways to derive revenue from the internet. Demanding that a popular blog no longer link to their content surely isn't one of them.  

bin Laden is dead
GM is alive


[ Parent ]
More great reporting from the Colorado Independent
GOP looks to lock up key energy county in contentious GarCo commissioner race

Both Houpt and Jankovsky expect outside influences will try to sway voters in the nearly 3,000-square-mile county of more than 55,000 residents that stretches from Glenwood Springs in the east all the way to the Utah state line.

In 2008, the nonprofit Western Tradition Partnership, founded in Montana but with offices in Denver, spent money on mailers in support of Martin and Samson, both of whom denied any coordination with their campaigns and denounced outside influences.

Another 501(c)4 that campaigned in the race, Western Heritage, was funded by $10,000 each from current Republican gubernatorial candidate and former congressman Scott McInnis and Paul Rady, CEO of Antero Resources, [emphasis Twitty] a Denver-based drilling company pursuing a 200-well project in GarCo's Battlement Mesa community.

A third nonprofit, Small Town Values, reportedly spent more than $7,000 on advertising for Samson and Martin. The group was registered to former Colorado Republican Party legal counsel John Zakhem.

Two 527 groups, so named for a section of the IRS tax code, insinuated themselves in the election, with both coming back to GOP strategist Scott Shires - an operative with a long history of questionable campaign tactics that have led to legal action. Shires failed to register one of the groups - the Colorado League of Taxpayers - and was fined $7,150 in the case.

Environmental nonprofits under the umbrella of the Western Organization of Resource Councils reportedly spent $15,000 campaigning in support of Democrats Bershenyi and Carter. WORC includes grassroots activist groups like the Grand Valley Citizens Alliance and Battlement Concerned Citizens, which are working to limit the impacts of Antero's drilling plan in Battlement Mesa.




"There are a lot of reasons not to elect me." Mitt Romney in a moment of clarity

"I'm Mitt Romney and yes, Wolf, that's also my first name," Willard Mitt Romney demonstrating 'policy flexibility.'  


Cut it back a bit, please...
No need to prove the point that some bloggers abuse Fair Use.  Take a few paragraphs or sentences and do the rest in your own words.

"There's a Romney Rule. The Romney Rule says, let's double down on the tax cuts for the wealthy." -- VP Joe Biden

[ Parent ]
It's a rather lengthy article...
if that matters.

"There are a lot of reasons not to elect me." Mitt Romney in a moment of clarity

"I'm Mitt Romney and yes, Wolf, that's also my first name," Willard Mitt Romney demonstrating 'policy flexibility.'  


[ Parent ]
It only matters a little bit
If you reproduce the "heart" of it, and don't add anything to it other than saying "look at this!" that's not fair use. See when the Nation reproduced just a page or so of Gerald Ford's memoirs -- not much of the total, but it was the only page anyone cared about, concerning the Nixon pardon. That was ruled to be outside fair use. Fresh litigation might come up with a different answer these days, but trying to rely on percentages isn't the best guide.

A leader on the battlefield can be a leader in Congress. -- redstateblues

[ Parent ]
No one exceeds Houpt for bravery


[ Parent ]
In case readers don't click the link (which I suppose is what got you into this mess)
It's fair to point out that The Statesman goes on to quote Bob Moore:

"But at the same time," (Moore) added, "I do cringe when I see Colorado Pols taking eight paragraphs out of a 10-paragraph story. It is piggy-backing for free off the work others have paid for."

I guess that's the difficulty here. One of these days Big Media is going to have to take a wealthy blog owner to court and have this thing out. There is such a fuzzy line to draw. Do I think Pols has crossed it on occasion? Yes. But that doesn't mean they are definitely in the wrong.

I also completely agree with Pols and how they've responded. This could have been handled in a much more professional manner by Beall and his clients. But they chose this route and will most likely end up worse off for it.


The big problem the Post faces
Is they have not made their website a compelling destination. And that is because fundamentally they are trying to fir their existing model onto the web. This is one of those things where all the King's horses and all the King's lawyers can't put Humpty Post together again.

It's a shame because a strong daily is a good thing. And people will find a way to make a profit delivering news over the web. But the Post is not yet desperate enough to try the truly radical changes success will require.

They're trying to manufacture buggy whips for automobiles.

No trees were destroyed in the posting of this comment. But a large number of electrons were horribly inconvenienced.


They had some really dumb
Flash animation banner ad on their main page the other day that was slowing my computer to a crawl--obviously poorly written and poorly tested.

I emailed the Post about how annoying it was.  Their response?

"Nobody else has complained."

Fuck them.  Their site is borderline unusable much of the time.

This is serious, you commie dolt  --davebarnes, 2012.


[ Parent ]
For some mysterious reason
even their RSS feeds take forever to load and occasionally crash my browser. It's the most sluggish site in newsland. And their Flash crashes the plug-in more than any other site's.

A leader on the battlefield can be a leader in Congress. -- redstateblues

[ Parent ]
It's not a mysterious reason
They don't get the web because they don't use it.

This is serious, you commie dolt  --davebarnes, 2012.

[ Parent ]
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?







Advertise Here!
ads@coloradopols.com


Active Users
Currently 5 user(s) logged on.

Search




Advanced Search



Colorado Pols Network


Jeffco Pols
  More >

Denver Pols
  More >











RSS 2.0



Pols Gets Mobile: ColoradoPols.com/mobile/

Colorado Pols is on Twitter: twitter.com/coloradopols

Email Pols


How to Write a Diary That Will Make the Front Page



Terms of Use/Privacy Policy



Pols Posting Policies



The Pols Penalty Box



Yard Signs!



The Pols "Mailbag"

Mailbag #1

Relevant Links

The Bell Policy Center

The Big Media Blog

Blog It Right

Blog For Growth

Blogometer

Business Word

Colorado Capitol Journal

Colorado Center on Law and Policy

Colorado Democratic Party

Colorado Ethics Watch

Colorado Independent

Colorado Labor Blog

Colorado Veterans for America

Colorado Legislature

Colorado Lib

Colorado Libertarian Blog

Colorado Media Matters

Colorado Progressive Coalition

Colorado Republican Party

Colorado Secretary of State

Colorado Senate Dems

Colorado Senate GOP

Colorado Young Democrats

Commentary Today

Coyote Gulch

CU Democrats

Curious Stranger

Daily Kos

Dan Willis-Rumors

Dem Notes

Democracy for Colorado

Denver Politics

East Boulder County Politics

Ed Stein Ink

Election Neutrality Now

eleXn

George in Denver

Great Education Colorado

Head First Colorado

The Hotline Political Network

Junction Daily Blog

Left in the West

Liberal and Loving It

Maintain Educational Standards in Colorado

Mount Virtus

MyDD

National Journal

On Call

Peak Dems

Political State Report

Progress Now

Prometheus

Project Vote Smart

Radio Free Denver

Senate Guru

Slapstick Politics

Steam Powered Opinions

Square State

Stygius

TalkLeft

The Thicket

The Hypothetical Wren

ThomasMC.com

Toilet Paper Online

TRACER Campaign Finance

View From a Height

Walter in Denver

Wash Park Prophet

Western Democrat


Colorado Pols is wholly owned by Colorado Pols, LLC
webmaster-at-coloradopols.com

Powered by: SoapBlox