| Some progressive lawmakers do not support the bill to end the special exemption for payday lenders and bring them under Colorado's 36 percent usury limit. They are concerned about people who currently borrow from payday lenders. Where will they go if this product is not offered? lawmakers ask.
By asking the question, they must be concerned about people like Toby Serrano, a master mechanic from Denver who took out a $400 payday loan to get his gas turned back on. Except Toby found out he could not pay the loan back when it was due two weeks later and ended up rolling it over or refinancing it for five months -- at a cost of $720 in fees.
Or maybe they are worried about Katie Oliver, who took out a $400 payday loan to cover the cost of clothing for her grandchildren. She couldn't pay it back when it was due, so she refinanced it and refinanced it for eight months. She ended up taking out new payday loans to pay off other payday loans. She could never get caught up and is now receiving food stamps and filing for bankruptcy.
Maybe they want to ensure access to payday debt for people like Portia Barnes, who took out a $480 payday loan for a security deposit on a new apartment after her boyfriend kicked in the door of her old one and then skipped out on the rent. Portia could not pay her loan back when due and spent a year refinancing it every two weeks, at $75 a pop.
If you think these are isolated cases, think again. Two-thirds of all the payday loans issued in 2008 were either rollover or refinanced loans. This means two out of every three borrowers could not pay off their loans when due. What would happen if two-thirds of some other consumer product, say toasters (or heck, even Toyotas), did not work as designed. Of course people demand action? |