President (To Win Colorado)
See Full Big Line
(D) Kamala Harris
(R) Donald Trump
80%
20%
CO-01 (Denver)
See Full Big Line
(D) Diana DeGette*
(R) V. Archuleta
98%
2%
CO-02 (Boulder-ish)
See Full Big Line
(D) Joe Neguse*
(R) Marshall Dawson
95%
5%
CO-03 (West & Southern CO)
See Full Big Line
(D) Adam Frisch
(R) Jeff Hurd
50%
50%
CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado)
See Full Big Line
(R) Lauren Boebert
(D) Trisha Calvarese
90%
10%
CO-05 (Colorado Springs)
See Full Big Line
(R) Jeff Crank
(D) River Gassen
80%
20%
CO-06 (Aurora)
See Full Big Line
(D) Jason Crow*
(R) John Fabbricatore
90%
10%
CO-07 (Jefferson County)
See Full Big Line
(D) B. Pettersen
(R) Sergei Matveyuk
90%
10%
CO-08 (Northern Colo.)
See Full Big Line
(D) Yadira Caraveo
(R) Gabe Evans
70%↑
30%
State Senate Majority
See Full Big Line
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
80%
20%
State House Majority
See Full Big Line
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
95%
5%
June 11, 2009 10:19 PM UTC
9 Comments
It doesn’t matter what Sotomayor’s position is on guns–she could even have a conceal carry–the NRA would say she is part of the Obama cabbal to take guns away from law abiding Americans.
The gun manufacturers are having a great year fearmongering guns out the door, don’t blow it.
for taking 2nd Amendment rights into consideration when he spoke with Judge Sotomayor. It’s reassuring that he’s walking the walk, and not just talking the talk when it comes to private firearms ownership. Not that I expected anything else considering his record in Congress, and the promises he made during the campaign; it’s just nice to see politicians who actually follow through.
Their foaming-at-the-mouth fomenting led to tragedies like the Holocaust Museum and Dr. Tiller.
They’ll have to answer to a Higher Authority someday.
I wouldn’t want to be in the room when Dr. Tiller the baby killer has to answer for the more then 65,000 murders he committed.
Now that would be judgement!
…which is hardly settled law. The ink’s still fresh on that decision. And even conservative legal types called it blatant social policy making. Nuts to Udall.
The Second Amendment means we all have a right to personal guns. That said, no right is absolute. Freedom of speech has limits, as do they all. The Second Amendment does not give anybody the right to have, say, a nuke.
Udall is right, and he’s smart.
that’s a real strong statement, isn’t it? “It’s settled law.” She definitely won’t take our guns away, that’s an iron-clad guarantee.
I don’t care much, I consider myself in the silent majority of gun owners who don’t mind reasonable gun regulation (especially of heavy weaponry and the ability of unstable and violent people to own any guns). But to use this statement as something to try to placate the Mountain West gun owner is pathetic.