President (To Win Colorado)
See Full Big Line
(D) Kamala Harris
(R) Donald Trump
80%
20%
CO-01 (Denver)
See Full Big Line
(D) Diana DeGette*
(R) V. Archuleta
98%
2%
CO-02 (Boulder-ish)
See Full Big Line
(D) Joe Neguse*
(R) Marshall Dawson
95%
5%
CO-03 (West & Southern CO)
See Full Big Line
(D) Adam Frisch
(R) Jeff Hurd
50%
50%
CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado)
See Full Big Line
(R) Lauren Boebert
(D) Trisha Calvarese
90%
10%
CO-05 (Colorado Springs)
See Full Big Line
(R) Jeff Crank
(D) River Gassen
80%
20%
CO-06 (Aurora)
See Full Big Line
(D) Jason Crow*
(R) John Fabbricatore
90%
10%
CO-07 (Jefferson County)
See Full Big Line
(D) B. Pettersen
(R) Sergei Matveyuk
90%
10%
CO-08 (Northern Colo.)
See Full Big Line
(D) Yadira Caraveo
(R) Gabe Evans
70%↑
30%
State Senate Majority
See Full Big Line
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
80%
20%
State House Majority
See Full Big Line
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
95%
5%
February 10, 2009 01:03 AM UTC
18 Comments
Loading ...
I agree with Haners that it was a good but long day. Unfortunately noone realized that Darryl Glenn will have to resign to run for County Commissioner. I wonder if Darryl thought this out? It won’t look good on his resume. Of course that is if the rumors are true and he does plan to run for Wayne Williams seat.
are there juicy details to share?
In fact, I think the two slates appeared to be fairly friendly to each other. They presented fairly different visions of the party, but it did not appear that the campaign digressed to personal attacks. That’s a good thing for everyone. The closeness of the race indicates that neither side is really preferred and both need to get along. That’s probably a good thing also.
…no drama, no interest. KIDDING. But I do wonder why the chair’s “running mate” didn’t win. I guess I’ll hafta to wait for the Lifetime movie to find out.
Both sides ran a clean campaign. Matter of fact, members of both teams met with each other before the vote and pledged to support each other, regardless of the outcome. Look for Cami Bremer (also a rising star) to play a prominent role in Rendleman’s staff.
He would have to resign? I don’t think it’s a good idea to use a position like this to further one’s ambitions. If he wants to run for Commissioner he should concentrate on that. Using the Republican Party to pad one’s resume will not go in his favor come election time. I thought Darryl was better than that.
So what’s the big deal? The name of the game Saturday was unity, and all you want to do is poke holes at someone who won? Won’t you people ever be happy?
I would assume that even if he has to step down for some reason, it would be a year from now. Are there any rules on this?
No rules on this. But my guess is that when he files for Commissioner he steps down. Glenn is a good guy and a solid conservative. I got no beef with him sharpening his conservative credentials by taking on this job.
Wish we’d get more reports like this from the Dem and GOP county organizations.
is a rising star and a star that needs to rise. That may have been the biggest story of the day. If he decides to run for further office, I’ll support him. His speech was great and I doubt anyone there was not inspired by him. My only concern is that if he has to resign (not sure the rules on that), who would take his place?
they relate to the common good?
This is one of the most unsubstantive posts I’ve ever read!
…pretty soon, all manner of administrative hierachy will be strewn about, littering the landscape.
He set the stage with the direction each slate wanted to take. As I recall, one was more grassroots and the other was a “return to conservative principles” sort of line. With such close votes and a split ticket, there’s no clear answer.
But Sir Robin is right, I probably should have recapped.
The Rendleman/Landgraf/Meadows Slate was running as the “Ready to Lead” ticket, reaching out to moderates and Ron Paul supporters. They said that the party had to return to their grassroot efforts to win in places like HD 17,18, and SD 11.
The Bremer/Glenn/Lanotte Slate was runnings as the “Vote Forward” ticket, which believed that minority, women, and youth voters needed to be engaged to grow the party, and that new technology needed to be used to reach voters.
It is interesting to note that once you look at who won what, each slate got 16 of their bonus members elected and the officers are split. I don’t think the precinct committeepeople rejected or embraced one slate or another, I think they said that they wanted both!