Get More Smarter on Monday (June 20)

MoreSmarterLogo-SunscreenTry not to get too crazy celebrating the summer solstice. It’s time to Get More Smarter with Colorado Pols! If you think we missed something important, please include the link in the comments below (here’s a good example). If you are more of a visual learner, check out The Get More Smarter Show.

TOP OF MIND TODAY…

► Counting today, the Primary Election is just eight days away. If you haven’t yet received a mail ballot, you should check your registration or address status ASAP. Go to JustVoteColorado.org for more information.

The Colorado Secretary of State’s office has released updated Primary turnout numbers; both Democrats and Republicans are voting/returning ballots at a similar rate of about 12%.

 

► Former Republican Presidential candidate Ted Cruz is back on the campaign trail, making national news for a stop in Denver today to endorse Darryl Glenn in Colorado’s five-candidate race in the Republican Primary for U.S. Senate. As CNN reports, Cruz took a noncommittal tone toward GOP Presidential nominee Donald Trump:

Ted Cruz returned to the campaign trail for the first time since suspending his presidential campaign to stump for senate hopeful Darryl Glenn in Denver — but at least one fan of the Texas senator isn’t ready to let his 2016 bid go.

As the former candidate acknowledged the “unusual” presidential race, the audience laughed, as a man shouted, “Run, Ted.”

“We may all need to run,” Cruz joked, who kicked off his remarks in his trademark way, saying, “God bless the great state of Colorado.”

Without mentioning presumptive Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump, the Texas senator stressed the importance of checks and balances, “regardless of what happens in November.”

Cruz and Glenn were together at a press event this morning in front of about 100 supporters at the Westin Hotel near Denver International Airport. ProgressNow Colorado points out some of the similarities between Cruz and Glenn.

 

► The Supreme Court has ruled that statewide assault weapons bans are permissible. As the Associated Press reports:

The justices on Monday left in place a lower court ruling that upheld laws that were passed in response to another mass shooting involving a semi-automatic weapon, the elementary school attack in Newtown, Connecticut.

The Supreme Court has repeatedly turned away challenges to gun restrictions since two landmark decisions that spelled out the right to a handgun to defend one’s own home…

…Seven states and the District of Columbia have enacted laws banning assault weapons. The others are California, Hawaii, Maryland, Massachusetts and New Jersey, according to the Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence. In addition, Minnesota and Virginia regulate assault weapons, the center said.

Still, nobody is coming to take your guns, no matter what the NRA says.

 

Get even more smarter after the jump…

IN CASE YOU ARE STANDING NEAR A WATER COOLER…

► Former state Sen. Gail Schwartz continues to harness all of the momentum in her bid to unseat Congressman Scott Tipton (R-Cortez) in CD-3. Schwartz nearly doubled Tipton’s fundraising output in the most recent reporting period for Congressional candidates.

 

► Donald Trump announced today that his campaign has fired manager Cory Lewandowski as part of an effort to convince establishment Republicans that he really will adapt his campaign to a focus on the General Election. Trump is also telling Republicans that “it would be helpful” if they would, you know, be supportive of his campaign for President.

 

► Denver’s annual PrideFest celebration was a star-studded affair — if you consider politicians to be “stars.” Meanwhile, Democrats were out in force with Get Out the Vote and registration efforts.

 

► Denver7 reporter Marshall Zelinger continues to examine the signature verification process (or lack thereof) that may have allowed several Republican Senate candidates to unjustly earn a place on the Primary ballot. Zelinger discussed the issue on his Politics Unplugged show on Sunday:

Just days after a woman was charged with forging signatures on ballot petitions for a U.S. Senate candidate, the Deputy Secretary of State told Denver7’s Marshall Zelinger that changes to the signature verification process may be slow to come.

Suzanne Staiert appeared on Politics Unplugged this week.

For this November’s election alone, Staiert says her office expects to have to verify more than one million signatures on petitions for ballot initiatives.  Most of those petitions are still being circulated.

Staiert says many of the rules on how signatures are verified will have to be changed by lawmakers. Those changes could come in 2017 or they could be put off until 2018.

Hot potato! You take it!

 

► The official Twitter account for Republicans in the Colorado Senate continues its feeble efforts to “shoot the messengers” whenever a Senate Republican does something stupid.

 

► The U.S. Senate continues to discuss gun safety measures, though it looks like little more than election-year political posturing. From Politico:

Spurred by the worst mass shooting in U.S. history, the Senate will vote Monday on a quartet of bills to prevent terrorists from buying weapons and overhaul the national background check system for firearms purchases.

But the chamber’s big gun show on Monday is expected to be just that: political theater.

All four proposals are reheated versions of legislation the Senate rejected in the past. Despite a flurry of negotiations over the past week, and some movement among centrist Republicans toward a compromise that continued over the weekend, there’s little indication the outcome will be any different this time.

“The Republicans have to look at themselves in the mirror and they have to look at their constituents in the eye this November,” Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) said on a recent conference call with reporters. “They hear the same messages we do from thousands and thousands of their constituents, just as we do from ours.”

The Senate will take a series of roll-call votes at 5:30 p.m. Monday.

Sigh.

As the Washington Post reports, gun safety measures that are likely to fail in the Senate are actually quite popular with voters in general:

The vast majority of Americans favor legislation being considered today in the Senate that would restrict people on the terrorist watch list from buying guns. But the measure will fail because those who oppose stricter gun laws are, on the whole, more passionate and politically organized than the average voters who support them.

This is the Republican Senate Majority’s way of saying, Look, we hear you — we just don’t care.

 

► Eric Nelson, the con-artist who refuses to drop out of the race in HD-42 despite a looonngg list of problems, would like you to give him some money now.

 

► Joey Bunch of the Denver Post updates his story examining key legislative races as they enter the home stretch of the Primary Election.

 

► Colorado company Vestas Wind Systems has agreed to a big project supplying as many as 1,000 wind power turbines for a huge wind farm in Iowa.

 

OTHER LINKS YOU SHOULD CLICK

 

► Yes, there are some Republicans who are still plotting a maneuver to try to prevent Donald Trump from becoming the GOP nominee for President when Republicans meet in Cleveland next month for the Republican National Convention.

 

► ProgressNow Executive Director Ian Silverii appears to be the new Democratic political expert for 9News. Silverii would fill the not-very-big-shoes of former 9News Democratic “pundit” James Mejia.

 

ICYMI

► You will watch The Get More Smarter Show! And you will like it.

 

Get More Smarter by liking Colorado Pols on Facebook!

8 Community Comments, Facebook Comments

  1. Genghis says:

    The Supreme Court has ruled that statewide assault weapons bans are permissible under the Constitution.

    That statement is factually incorrect. What SCOTUS did today was decline to review a decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. It's well established that a Supreme Court order declining to review a lower court decision is not a ruling or commentary on the merits of that decision. As with the same-sex marriage issue, the Supreme Court likely will not review a case on the merits until some lower court goes a different way on the constitutionality of assault weapon bans.

    • Not 100% accurate, either – or, at least, it could be read the wrong way.

      The Supreme Court has rejected reviews on a number of cases surrounding gun control legislation since Heller and McDonald. In each case, and in multiple jurisdictions, Appeals Courts have held that the states and localities have broad rights to restrict firearm ownership and features.

      If the Supreme Court really disagreed with these rulings, they wouldn't wait for a split ruling to pop up. The Court does often take cases where there is uncertainty in the Constitutionality of a law without waiting for such a split.

      The fact is, the majority opinions in Heller and McDonald themselves said that the 2nd Amendment wasn't absolute and that the states had some latitude in crafting regulations on gun ownership. Rejecting these two challenges to assault rifile bans doesn't signify a new precedent – rather, it suggests that the existing precedents were not upended by Heller and McDonald.

      • Genghis says:

        Oh yeah, I agree that Second Circuit decision is consistent with even the demonstrably nutty decisions in Heller and McDonald. And I definitely jumped the gun in my earlier post, seeing as how there's arguably a circuit split right now regarding the level of scrutiny that applies to these particular laws (a 4th Circuit panel said strict scrutiny applies, although that ruling is currently up for en banc review).

        But my point is that the statement from today's Get More Smarter ("The Supreme Court has ruled that statewide assault weapons bans are permissible under the Constitution") is incorrect. Such misstatements about the effect of cert denials are pretty common, but I don't Colorado Pols opened up to a "dumbass lefties misrepresent Supreme Court order" type of attack.

  2. Voyageur says:

    Except for Moddy.   We are going to take his guns away.   And maybe Negev’s too, if he does any more of this overlong and convoluted statistical stupefaction pieces.   But Blue Cat can keep her guns — I sure ain't going be the one to take 'em away from her.

Leave a Reply

Comment from your Facebook account


You may comment with your Colorado Pols account above (click here to register), or via Facebook below.