CO-04 (Special Election) See Full Big Line

(R) Greg Lopez

(R) Trisha Calvarese

90%

10%

President (To Win Colorado) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Biden*

(R) Donald Trump

80%

20%↓

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

90%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

90%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(D) Adam Frisch

(R) Jeff Hurd

(R) Ron Hanks

40%

30%

20%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert

(R) Deborah Flora

(R) J. Sonnenberg

30%↑

15%↑

10%↓

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Dave Williams

(R) Jeff Crank

50%↓

50%↑

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

90%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) Brittany Pettersen

85%↑

 

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(R) Gabe Evans

(R) Janak Joshi

60%↑

35%↓

30%↑

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
March 15, 2016 11:12 AM UTC

Colorado Republicans Get Icky Over LGBT "Conversion Therapy"

  • 25 Comments
  • by: Colorado Pols
Rep. Kathleen Conti (R).
Rep. Kathleen Conti (R).

A debate here in Colorado over legislation that would ban the practice of so-called “conversion therapy” to “cure” individuals of their homosexuality made international news yesterday, as the UK Guardian’s Sam Levin reports:

Colorado Republicans and conservative religious groups have mobilized against the proposed ban, even though the practice of trying to change someone’s sexual orientation has been widely discredited as harmful and dangerous, and are expected to defeat it.

Repeating homophobic and scientifically disproven claims about sexual orientation, [Pols emphasis] Republican legislators and backers of “reparative therapy” have argued that this kind of counseling can be effective at enabling LGBT people to live heterosexual lives. And if their efforts to defeat the bill are successful, the state’s licensed professionals will continue to expose queer youth to a methodology that advocates and psychologists say can lead to depression and suicide.

The legislative battle could have national implications as other states explore similar efforts. Some supporters of the ban who have experienced conversion therapy will testify that their parents sent them from across the country to Colorado for the controversial services, which can have long-term negative impacts on mental health.

During the debate on the House floor on House Bill 16-1210, House Republicans led by Reps. Tim Leonard and Kathleen Conti pulled out every discredited chestnut in the homophobe’s arsenal of talking points–not just to defend “conversion therapy,” but to very openly disparage LGBT citizens in blunt terms:

Representative Kathleen Conti, a Republican, compared being gay to alcoholism, [Pols emphasis] asking psychologists who testified against reparative therapy whether they would help a minor who came to them wanting to overcome the addiction.

Conti further expressed concerns that the bill would prevent professionals from helping LGBT minors who want to “compartmentalize” and suppress same-sex desires, who may say to a therapist: “I feel like I have these homosexual desires, but … I know innately I want to have my own biological children.”

Rep. Gordon Klingenschmitt.
Rep. Gordon Klingenschmitt.

Leonard, a staunch social conservative with a long history of uncouth statements about gay people, eagerly joined in Conti’s gay=alcoholism analogy (BTW, we should point out that this is the same Kathleen Conti who was absolutely convinced that al Qaeda was operating secret training camps in Colorado). And then, naturally, Rep. Gordon “Dr. Chaps” Klingenschmitt got his turn:

Rep. Gordon Klingenschmitt, R-Colorado Springs, tried to tack an amendment onto the bill that would have created a religious exemption to the measure, allowing a child to have such therapy if that’s what they wanted.

The point of the bill, of course, is therapy that presumes one’s LGBT sexuality to be a “mental illness” has been completely discredited by the vast majority of mental health professionals–and should not be used on anyone. Any attempt to create an “exemption” for those who may “want” this discredited “therapy” ignores the state’s responsibility to prevent the use of quack therapies by licensed professionals.

But in the process of debating this legislation, we’ve learned once again that some of our lawmakers have seriously messed up views about gay people.

You know, in general.

Tweet
Share

Comments

25 thoughts on “Colorado Republicans Get Icky Over LGBT “Conversion Therapy””

  1. Conversion therapy is a bunch of crap and any intelligent person knows that. Sure, gays can deny their orientation all they want and many do, marrying persons of the opposite sex and raising families. But, ultimately, one can't deny their own genetics. 

    "allowing a child to have such therapy if that's what they wanted….."  Who is "they?" Parents?  The kids themselves, assuming the child is of age, meaning at age 18 (16 in some states)?  I'll go out on a limb here by saying that conversion therapy is a form of child abuse. 

    1. You’re not out on a limb, CHB. I don't hear any wood cracking. It is child abuse, and I guarantee that any teenager put through this nightmare will end up hating their parents for subjecting them to it. 

      On another line of thought, what kind of person would be gullible enough to marry someone who had been through this process? I've yet to hear of anyone who stayed "converted" over the long haul. They always seem to end up leaving a spouse, usually with at least one child to raise alone.

       

      1. Well said.  We were friends with a couple for 20 years, our daughter babysitting their kids, etc.  One day the guy moved out and my wife had no clue as to why.  World wise as I am, I said "Cerchez la femme.."  If a guy moves out after 20 years, it's always for another woman, usually  younger one.

        Actually, more like "Cherchez le homme."  I ran into him in my Capitol Hill neighborhood a few weeks later with his new, gay, companion.  Imagine the torment my friend went through for 20 years.  Trying to make a marriage work for the sake of the kids, etc.  Practicing the dark arts of deception and self-loathing until he just finally had to come out as the person God made him as, not the man he was always told God wanted him to be.

        God knows, I'm no expert on sexual orientation.  Studies on identical twins show if one child is gay, the likelihood of his/her sibling being gay is much higher than random, about 25 percent, yet still well less than genetics alone would determine.  Whatever it is, it''s not a conscious choice, any more than I choose to be diabetic  — another genetically influenced condition.  And whatever it is, it is determined early and irreversibly.

        Yes, this shaming and bullying is child abuse.  And it should be outlawed as the barbaric practice it is.

         

         

  2. One is free to believe what they wish of course; but I choose to believe that God doesn't make mistakes, And to say that a person is "born gay" is saying that God made a mistake. Why you ask? Because if logic follows, why would God create something that He clearly condemns in His own book? That makes no sense. Ergo, being gay is a choice, not genetics as some would claim to suit their own bias. If you don't believe in God, that is also your prerogative, but it changes nothing.

    1. Allow me please to follow your "logic".  The god who makes no mistakes is the god that made you.  god says in his book, that you're not only imperfect but a sinner, born a sinner.  why you ask?  that makes no sense, ergo your beliefs are nonsense.  If you believe in an imperfect nonsensical god that is your perogative, but it changes nothing. 

      1. Along those same lines, Dio……The Truth's god, who makes no mistakes, also gave us Adolf Hitler, Pol Pot, the Unibomber, Timothy McVeigh, Osama bin Laden, and Donald Trump. How does the Truth reconcile that?

    2. That same god said you will go to hell if you put dairy and meat products on the same plate.   You're damned for eternity, you cheeseburger eating sonuvabitch!

    7. Easier explanation for those who believe god doesn't make mistakes: Gay people aren't mistakes.  God created them every bit as intentionally as he created straight people, and he loves them every bit as much, too.

      1. I am unaware of anywhere in the Gospels Jesus even brought it up. I think most of that stuff was brought up by St. Paul…whom I suspect was a little like our delightful Dr. Chaps… 

        1. Jesus is never cited specifically on the subject of homosexuality.  And Paul's letter to the Galatians , in my view, overrides the "abominations" based in Leviticus.  So Paul is on both sides of the issue.

  3. So THAT'S what Kathleen Conti looks like? I see a future for her as Fox News talking head. She looks like Malibu Barbie Wing Nut. I mean that as a compliment. I figured her to be another Vicky Marble/Peggy Littleton psycho-stare zombie clone. Conti can be the next Sarah Palin……

    2. As an elected official, her appearance is irrelevant.

      she does look like she could fit in at Fox…. But you can't judge a female Fox host only by her face.

       

      i agree, as is almost always true, with BC.

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

108 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!