The Fort Collins Coloradoan’s Bill Theobald caught up with Sen. Cory Gardner for a story this week, and asked Gardner about his recent proposal to allow some contraceptives now available only by prescription to be sold over the counter. As our readers know, Gardner has taken a lot of heat since his OTC birth control legislation was introduced–though a nominal keeping of a campaign promise, Gardner’s bill could force millions of women who presently receive contraceptive coverage without cost under the Affordable Care Act to pay for the same medication.
It’s worth remembering that Gardner proposed over the counter contraception aS a way of deflecting from his longtime support for the “Personhood” abortion bans, which in addition to banning all abortions would have restricted access to common forms of birth control. So it’s not like he can be considered, you know, an expert on this stuff.
As the Coloradoan reports, he’s not very good at explaining himself either:
The one piece of legislation that Gardner has been involved in that has attracted the most attention is a bill to encourage drug makers to offer contraceptives that don’t require a prescription.
The bill was introduced earlier this month by Republican Sen. Kelly Ayotte of New Hampshire and co-sponsored by Gardner.
Cecile Richards, president of Planned Parenthood Action Fund, called the bill “a sham and an insult to women.” She and others said the bill is designed to make contraceptives more expensive because if they are offered over the counter, the cost would not be covered by insurance.
Gardner called the reaction “hysterical.” [Pols emphasis]
“This is about providing safe and effective contraception on their time when they want it not when the doctor’s office is open,” Gardner said.
The word “hysterical”–which has its origins in dark-age superstitions about pregnancy and women’s emotional states–is not always considered sexist. Heck, we’ve used it ourselves a few times to describe such things as the Republican Party’s outlandish response to Obamacare. But in the context of a discussion about birth control for women, it’s an unusually poor choice of words. The fact is, Gardner has no good answer for women who would be forced to pay under his proposal for something they get now without cost. He didn’t have a good answer on the campaign trail last year, and he doesn’t have one now.
But for the sake of not just Gardner, but also so many other Republicans looking to emulate his example of “muddying up” the issue to placate swing voters, he really needs to figure out a way to talk about this without insulting women who happen to have a legitimate concern about his proposal.
Unless, of course, he’s not even trying anymore.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
BY: JohnNorthofDenver
IN: Monday Open Thread
BY: JohnNorthofDenver
IN: Boebert Damns Her Would-Be Successor With Faint Praise
BY: Meiner49er
IN: Boebert Damns Her Would-Be Successor With Faint Praise
BY: ParkHill
IN: Monday Open Thread
BY: Genghis
IN: Threats From The Right, Relief From Clerks After Tina Peters Goes To Jail
BY: ParkHill
IN: Monday Open Thread
BY: spaceman2021
IN: I’m Gabe Evans, and This is the Worst Ad You’ve Seen in Years
BY: JohnInDenver
IN: Threats From The Right, Relief From Clerks After Tina Peters Goes To Jail
BY: 2Jung2Die
IN: Threats From The Right, Relief From Clerks After Tina Peters Goes To Jail
BY: davebarnes
IN: Monday Open Thread
Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!
What did he actually say? I can't find a quote anywhere.
The author of the Coloradoan piece, Bill Theobald, probably excerpted or his editor edited Gardner's original remark, by which I infer that Gardner's full quote was probably even more condescending. It's hard to see how the word "hysterical" in reference to women reacting to a birth control proposal can be anything but sexist and demeaning.
Note to Cory Gardner: Sometimes it's good to be taken out of context.
Maybe Cory thought it was hysterical as in, you know, funny…
Doubt it.
I was being snarky, playing off MJ55's comment about the actual quote — I was imagining how it could possibly come off as even more condescending. The alternate use of hysterical did it for me.
Maybe Gardner thinks it is hysterical that people are finally figuring out that he really isn't a moderate or thoughtful person. Fool me once
Conman Cory ain't foolin' nobody.People who voted for him knew exactly what they were getting, as did the ones who voted against him
This man is such a weasely scumbag. Watching him smile while he questions someone for whom he has utter contempt is a window into the vacuous nature of his soul.